Pipes and tubular conduits – Distinct layers – With intermediate insulation layer
Reexamination Certificate
1999-07-08
2001-10-23
Scherbel, David A. (Department: 3752)
Pipes and tubular conduits
Distinct layers
With intermediate insulation layer
C138S112000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06305429
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to double walled pipe structures.
2. Description of Related Art
Such double walled pipe structures are often used for undersea pipelines in the oil extraction industry. Such pipelines lead from the undersea oilfield extraction point to a floating or subsea distribution point. The crude oil carried by these pipes normally emanates from beneath the surface at an elevated temperature. typically 110 to 190° C. If the crude oil is allowed to cool, lower melting point fractions will solidify and prevent further flow along the pipe. Hence, it is important to maintain the elevated temperature of the crude oil, at least until an initial separation stage can be effected.
This is normally achieved by insulating the pipeline. and
FIG. 1
shows a known double walled pipe structure comprising an inner flow pipe
10
held concentrically within an outer sleeve pipe
12
. Crude oil
14
flows within the flow pipe
10
. An insulating material
16
is placed in the annular region between the flow pipe
10
and the sleeve pipe
12
. The entire assembly is shown resting on the seabed
18
.
The sleeve pipe
12
provides additional mechanical strength, and also prevents water from contacting the insulation material
16
. Such insulation materials are commonly porous and would hence lose their insulating ability if they become wet. IT is therefore important to provide an adequate seal against longitudinal Ingress of water along the pipeline, and our earlier international application no. PCT/GB96/01129 filed May 13th, 1996 discloses an annular bulkhead suitable for such purpose.
An inevitable result of maintaining the crude oil at elevated temperature is that at least the flow pipe
10
will be subjected to thermal expansion. This will result inter alia in either an extension of the longitudinal length of the pipeline, or an increase in the longitudinal stress in the pipeline. Such stresses as may result from an increase to 190° C. are capable of causing plastic deformation in a steel pipeline. There are two generally accepted means of absorbing these thermal expansion problems; the first is to bury the pipeline beneath the seabed hence fixing it in position and preventing deformation. The other is to allow the initially straight pipeline shown in
FIG. 2
a
to adopt a meandering course as shown in
FIG. 2
b
and hence take up the increase in length. It is important that the longitudinal extension is maintained within acceptable limits, else a kink such as shown at
20
in
FIG. 2
c
can develop. Such kinks, or areas of excessively high curvature, can cause the pipeline structure to exceed its design limitations
Double walled pipe structures are effective in limiting the overall longitudinal extension, as shown in
FIG. 3
a
. In the absence of longitudinal extension, the flow pipe
10
will be at an elevated tension shown at point
22
, whilst the sleeve pipe
12
at ambient temperature will be at zero tension, shown at point
24
. If both pipes are allowed to extend longitudinally, the composite structure will adopt a position in which the compressive tension in the flow pipe
10
balances the tensile tension in the sleeve pipe
12
, i.e. at point
26
. This point is a compromise situation in which the tension T
R
in both pipes is lower than a confined unextended pipeline, and the resultant extension is less than in an unconstrained single walled pipeline.
In order for this behaviour to be predictable, it is important that the flow and sleeve pipes
10
and
12
remain in longitudinal register. i.e. that individual elements of the pipe do not become longitudinally separated. The reason for this is shown schematically in
FIG. 3
d
, in which it has been assumed that part of the sleeve pipe
12
is constrained, for example by interaction with the seabed, and that the corresponding part of the flow pipe
10
has become free to move longitudinally relative to that part of the sleeve pipe
12
This means that extension of the sleeve pipe
12
takes place effectively along a shorter length identified as
28
, whilst extension of the flow pipe takes place along the entire length. The result of this is that a smaller extension of the sleeve pipe
12
will cause the same increase in tension, and the balance point
26
′ is at a significantly greater tension in both pipelines. This tension is greater than the original design tension arrived at in
FIG. 3
a
and must therefore be avoided.
The maintenance of both pipelines in longitudinal register is commonly referred to as “longitudinal compliance”. It will be clear that longitudinal compliance is achieved by ensuring adequate transfer of longitudinal forces between the two pipes.
FIG. 4
shows a method by which this has previously been achieved. A double walled pipeline is supplied in 24 meter lengths, which is comprises two 12 meter lengths of concentric pipes
10
,
12
which are joined at their ends by annular castings which serve to join both pipes and lead to the resultant outlet of diameter corresponding to the flow pipe
10
. This can be connected end to end to a similar structure. At the joins, a cylindrical cover
30
is welded in place to give a smooth external profile. Insulation
16
is usually fitted beneath the cover
30
. Thus, a direct steel to steel link is formed between the two pipes.
The difficulty inherent in such a structure is that the castings are an integral part of the flow line
10
which is carrying a fluid at an elevated temperature and pressure. The castings must therefore meet the required design standards for the inner pipe, which requires careful control of the cast conditions. This difficulty inevitably increases the cost.
In the system described in our application number PCT/GB96/01129, such castings were omitted and the bulkheads disclosed were used to seal in place hollow alumina-silicate microspheres as the insulating medium
16
. Such microspheres can, when compacted, provide a significant shear force transfer between the two pipes
10
,
12
. Hence, such a compacted insulator was capable of ensuring longitudinal compliance. The system disclosed in PCT/GB96/01129 relied on this effect.
Other solid insulating materials are generally polymeric and unable to withstand the elevated temperatures involved without degrading within the lifetime of the pipe. Fibrous insulation materials such as mineral wool have substantially no shear strength whatsoever and cannot therefore contribute to longitudinal compliance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention results from the discovery by the inventors that a bulkhead such as described in PCT/GB96/01129, ie a bulkhead comprising longitudinally compressed elastomeric annular sealing members, is indeed capable of providing shear force transfer. It is therefore sufficient to provide such bulkheads at regular intervals as the primary means of shear force transfer and not rely on any force transfer in the insulating medium. This will, for example, permit the use of alternative insulation materials other than alumina-silicate microspheres.
The present invention therefore provides in its first aspect an insulated pipework system comprising an outer sleeve, an inner flow pipe and insulating material within the space therebetween, characterised by the use of a longitudinally compressed elastomeric member in the space between The inner and outer pipes as The primary means for transferring longitudinal forces between the inner and outer pipes.
In its second aspect, the present invention provides an insulated pipework system comprising an outer sleeve pipe, an inner flow pipe, an insulating material within the space therebetween, other than hollow alumina-silicate microspheres, wherein a longitudinally compressed elastomeric member is provided at intervals in the space between the inner and outer pipes.
Compression of The elastomeric member is preferably by way of rigid plates on either side thereof which compress an the elastomeric member. For example, bolts can be passed through bores in the plates a
Codling Russell
Dearden Russell
Summerfield Paul
Welch Stuart
Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley LLP
Corus UK Limited
Hwu Davis
Scherbel David A.
LandOfFree
Double walled pipe structures does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Double walled pipe structures, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double walled pipe structures will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2564361