Double-proxy remote data access system

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Remote data accessing

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S213000, C709S226000, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07139811

ABSTRACT:
A method for enabling access to a data resource, which is held on a file server (25) on a first local area network (LAN) (21a), by a client (28) on a second LAN (21b). A proxy receiver (48) on the second LAN (21b) intercepts a request for the data resource submitted by the client (28) and transmits a message via a wide area network (WAN) (29) to a proxy transmitter (52) on the first LAN (21a), requesting the data resource. The proxy transmitter (52) retrieves a replica of the data resource from the file server (25) and conveys the replica of the data resource over the WAN (29) to the proxy receiver (48), which serves the replica of the data resource from the proxy receiver (48) to the client (28) over the second LAN (21b).

REFERENCES:
patent: 5611049 (1997-03-01), Pitts
patent: 5926834 (1999-07-01), Carlson et al.
patent: 5987506 (1999-11-01), Carter et al.
patent: 6085234 (2000-07-01), Pitts et al.
patent: 6119151 (2000-09-01), Cantrell et al.
patent: 6195650 (2001-02-01), Gaither et al.
patent: 6356863 (2002-03-01), Sayle
patent: 6574618 (2003-06-01), Eylon et al.
patent: 6718372 (2004-04-01), Bober
patent: 6748502 (2004-06-01), Watanabe et al.
patent: 2004/0210604 (2004-10-01), Li et al.
P. Mockapertis, Request for Comments: 1035, entitled: “Domain Names—Implementation and Specification”, Nov. 1987, 55 pages.
R. Fielding, et al., Request for Comments: 2616, entitled: “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1”, Jun. 1999, 114 pages.
BIND 9 Administrator Reference Manual (ARM), Version 9, Sep. 2000, Internet Software Consortium, Redwood City, CA, 96 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/785,977, filed Feb. 16, 2001, entitled: “Differentiated content and application delivery via internet”.
Pawlowski, et al., “The NFS Version 4 Protocol”, published at the System Administration and Networking (SANE) Conference (May 22-25, 2000 MECC, Maastricht, The Netherlands).
Braam, et al., “Removing bottlenecks in distributed filesystems: Coda and Intermezzo as examples”, published in the proceedings of Linux Expo 1999 (May 1999).
Guy, et al., “Implementation of the ficus replicated file system”, Proceedings of the Summer USENIX Conference (Anaheim, CA, Jun. 1990), pp. 63-71.
Page, et al., Perspectives on optimistically replicated, peer-to-peer filing >>, Software: Practice and Experience 28(2), 1998, pp. 155-180.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Double-proxy remote data access system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Double-proxy remote data access system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double-proxy remote data access system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3628316

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.