Optical: systems and elements – Lens – With reflecting element
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-26
2003-05-06
Nguyen, Thong (Department: 2872)
Optical: systems and elements
Lens
With reflecting element
C359S365000, C359S727000, C359S729000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06560039
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to objective lenses used in a variety of applications, including microlithography, photo-ablabon, ultraviolet (UV) inspection, and mastering of optical data storage media, such as CD and DVD.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Prior art objective lenses suffer from problems that render them inferior for our purposes. One type of prior art objective lens suitable for many applications is the double mirror objective lens, examples of which are shown in
FIGS. 1A
,
2
A, and
3
A, which are shown approximately to scale relative to one another. While relatively easy and inexpensive to manufacture, and while enjoying little, if any, chromatic aberration, double mirror objectives using two spherical mirrors must generally adhere to the Schwarzschild ratio, a ratio of the radii of curvature of the lenses equal to a value of about 2.6, to reduce aberrations. Adherence to the Schwarzschild ratio limits the amount by which obscuration can be reduced without undesirably increasing aberrations. In the example shown in
FIG. 1A
, the double mirror objective
1
includes a light path
2
along which light travels to strike a convex mirror
3
, which reflects the light onto a concave mirror
4
. In the objective lens of
FIG. 1A
, the light path
2
includes a hole in the concave mirror
4
, but the light can be transmitted to the convex mirror
3
in other ways. The concave mirror
4
then reflects the light toward the convex mirror
3
and toward a focal point
5
of the objective
1
, which is typically behind the convex mirror
3
. This type of double mirror objective forms images with little or no chromatic aberrations, but suffers a large percentage of obscuration by the convex mirror
3
and has a relatively small maximum numerical aperture. When made with a relatively large working distance, the spherical aberrations throughout the image field are unacceptably large as shown in
FIGS. 1B-1F
.
FIG. 2A
shows an objective
1
′ of the type shown in
FIG. 1A
, but made in relatively compact form to reduce spherical aberrations. While the spherical aberrations of the objective
1
′ of
FIG. 2A
are significantly improved as seen in
FIGS. 2B-2F
, the objective
1
′ has a much smaller working distance, still has a large obscuration, and still has a relatively small maximum numerical aperture. In
FIGS. 2B-2F
, traces for three wavelengths, &lgr;
1
, &lgr;
2
, &lgr;
3
, have been included to illustrate the lack of significant chromatic aberrations introduced by this type of objective. In the particular example, &lgr;
1
=248.6 nm, &lgr;
2
=248.4 nm, and &lgr;
3
=248.2 nm.
In applications requiring lower obscurations, the double mirror objective can be forced to have a smaller obscuration as shown in FIG.
3
A. Here, the objective
1
″ includes a convex mirror
3
″ that is much smaller in relation to the light cone reflected from the concave mirror
4
″, yielding a much lower obscuration. However, the reduced obscuration comes at the cost of high spherical aberrations, as seen in
FIGS. 3B-3F
. While these aberrations can be reduced using large departure aspheric mirror surfaces, such large departure surfaces are more difficult and costly to manufacture. As in
FIGS. 2B-2F
, traces for three wavelengths, &lgr;
1
, &lgr;
2
, &lgr;
3
, have been included in
FIGS. 3B-3F
to illustrate the lack of significant chromatic aberrations introduced by this type of objective. In the particular example, &lgr;
1
=248.6 nm, &lgr;
2
=248.4 nm, and &lgr;
3
=248.2 nm.
Adding a refractor to the double mirror objective overcomes the problem of spherical aberration in relatively low obscurabon double mirror objectives while avoiding the use of large departure aspheric surfaces. However, introducing such a refractor into the objective yields a catadioptric lens system, which suffers from chromatic aberrations. The chromatic aberrations limit the wavelength range or bandwidth with which a given prior art catadioptric objective can reasonably be used, making such systems impractical for many applications. In addition, prior art catadioptric objectives have problems related to placement of the convex mirror that render the objectives insufficient for our needs.
A particularly good prior art catadioptric objective includes the convex mirror placed in front of a two optical surface refractor. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,520,635 to Grey. While this arrangement significantly reduces spherical aberration and suffers from a lower chromatic aberration than many other catadioptric objectives, it still suffers from an unacceptably large obscuration. Further, the numerical aperture of this type of objective is still limited in its range. In addition, the convex mirror must be glued or otherwise attached to the refractor, which can cause other problems. In particular, glue can foul the refractor and, in some cases, can break down if exposed to UV rays.
Another good prior art catadioptric objective, an optical disc reader objective disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,835,380 to Opheij et al., uses a concave Mangin mirror with a convex mirror positioned at the center of the Mangin mirror's front surface. This objective enjoys the reduced spherical aberrations of the catadioptric system, but can only be used with a narrow bandwidth of light. Here again, the convex mirror must be glued to or otherwise attached to or supported against the Mangin mirror's front surface. While glues and adhesives work well for the wavelengths used in optical disc readers, many other applications, such as microlithography, use wavelengths that break down most adhesives in short order. In addition, adhesives can alter the light to some degree. Thus, gluing a convex mirror on the front of a Mangin mirror is not a viable solution in applications using wavelengths of light unfriendly to adhesives or that require a minimum of image degradation.
Thus, prior art double mirror objectives can enjoy reduced chromatic and spherical aberration when sized in accordance with the Schwarzschild ratio, but suffer from high obscurations and short working distances. Prior art catadioptric objectives enjoy lower obscurations and low spherical aberrations, but suffer from narrow usable bandwidths because of relatively high chromatic errors. Further, no prior art system has adequately low obscuration, adequately low spherical aberration, and a suitable working distance for many applications, let alone the additional feature of low chromatic aberration. All of these prior art objectives further suffer from relatively low numerical apertures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We achieve superior performance in a catadioptric objective by moving the convex mirror to an opposite side of the refractor from the concave mirror, preferably without the use of adhesives or other supports. In the preferred embodiments, we use a multifunction component with a refractor portion and a reflector portion, the reflector portion being the convex mirror and being formed in a surface of the refractor portion. We prefer to grind a depression into a back or right surface of the refractor portion so that the periphery of the reflector portion is surrounded by the back or right refractive interface of the refractor portion. We then polish the depression and coat it with a coating that renders the depression reflective into the refractive material of the refractor portion and toward the concave reflector. In this manner, we produce a multifunction component that retracts, reflects, and again refracts light in one part of a light path through the objective, then refracts the light twice in another part of the light path. For example, in an objective where the light enters the system and crosses the front or left refractive interface of the refractor portion, the light is refracted as it crosses the refractive interface, travels through the refractor portion to reflect from the convex mirror, travels across the front or left refractive interface of the refractor portion where it is again re
Tienvieri C. Theodore
Webb James E.
Eugene Stephens & Associates
Nguyen Thong
Rowe Jesse
Tropel Corporation
LandOfFree
Double mirror catadioptric objective lens system with three... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Double mirror catadioptric objective lens system with three..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double mirror catadioptric objective lens system with three... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3077724