Double end derail

Details Double end derail Double end derail

1998-10-05

2001-03-20

Morano, S. Joseph (Department: 3617)

Railways

Car-attached derailer

C246S163000, C104S262000, C104S265000, C104S267000, C104S268000, C104S269000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06202564

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to safety devices for vehicles that travel on a rail. Specifically, the invention relates to double end or bi-directional derails for derailing and thereby stopping a runaway railed vehicle traveling in either of two directions on a rail system.
Derails are devices that are situated on or near a rail and which may be selectively positioned with respect to the rail so as to cause a runaway railcar to become derailed. Derails are useful, for example, to protect personnel or other rail vehicles from harm. As exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 2,829,246, the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, bi-directional slidable derails are known. These devices typically comprise a derail shoe having derailing bars, and a guide box to allow the derail to be moved into and out of the derailing position.
Such prior art derail configurations are typically damaged after use, necessitating replacement or considerable repair of the derail. Usually, significant deformation and damage to the derail shoe occurs as a result of the impact of the rail vehicle wheel with the derail shoe. This is due to the high thrust load of the railed vehicle wheel against the derail shoe during impact. As a result of the high thrust load in prior art derails and the massive construction required to withstand the large impact forces of very heavy railed vehicles, prior art derails are characterized by significant weight and material cost. On the other hand, excessive weight is undesirable since a great deal of manual or automated effort is required to install and actuate derails in general. Thus, derail construction efforts have focused on providing for sufficient diversion or absorption of the thrust load while maintaining reasonable or practical weight of the derail assembly.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,829,246, describes the use of slight deflection angles on single directional derails. However, such modifications to single directional derails have heretofore been recognized as disadvantageous when applied to bi-directional derails because the resulting configuration is often too heavy. In fact, the prior art exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 2,829,246 discloses only compact bi-directional configurations which have rather abrupt deflection angles and Thus, prior art bi-directional derails suffer from the disadvantage of sacrificing more gradual deflection angles in favor of providing a compact design. It would therefore be desirable to provide a bi-directional derail construction which reduces the thrust load of the railed vehicle during impact by providing gradual deflection angles while maintaining the overall derail weight and material cost within practical limits.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention solves the aforementioned problems and others by providing a bidirectional derail construction which permits a gradual deflection angle. In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a derail having a welded plate construction with a derail shoe assembly including a deflector rail with extended engagement surfaces and gradual engagement angles relative to the longitudinal extent of the rail. Specifically, the invention provides a derail having a derail shoe length of at least 43 inches and first and second deflector bars to have angles of less than 15 degrees relative to the rail. In accordance with the invention, increased strength is achieved through the use of deflector rail support flanges which abut the deflector rail and extend along an angled plate on the derail shoe assembly. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, lateral support blocks are provided on the derail guide assembly to engage or abut the web of the rail and to thereby strengthen the torsional resistance of the derail guide assembly.


REFERENCES:
patent: 1035875 (1912-08-01), Hancock
patent: 1301556 (1919-04-01), Gravis
patent: 1687667 (1928-10-01), Helmes
patent: 2546667 (1951-03-01), Hayes
patent: 2829246 (1958-04-01), Hayes
patent: 4165060 (1979-08-01), Meyer
patent: 122362 (1918-07-01), None

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Double end derail does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Double end derail, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Double end derail will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2488354