Doppler correction and path loss compensation for airborne...

Telecommunications – Radiotelephone system – Zoned or cellular telephone system

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C455S067130, C455S012100, C455S011100, C455S013100

Reexamination Certificate

active

06675013

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to a cellular communications system including an airborne repeater, and particularly to compensation of airborne repeater links.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The increasing need for communications networks and capabilities in outlying and geographically diverse locations has created greater demand for cellular systems. Many new carriers providing the infrastructure for such systems have focused their resources on building as many terrestrial cell stations as possible to expand their respective areas of coverage and consequently generate more revenue.
However, the buildout rate for the terrestrial cell stations is typically slow and expensive, especially in mountainous or otherwise difficult to access areas. In addition, in some these areas, a carrier's return on investment may not provide the incentive necessary for the carrier to build the necessary cell stations, thereby leaving these areas with either limited or no cellular service at all. Further, many areas having a sufficient number of cellular communications base transceiving stations to handle calls during both off-peak and peak times cannot adequately handle large volumes of calls during sporting events or other short-term special events that temporarily attract large crowds.
In response to the above, airborne cellular systems have been proposed in which a cellular repeater mounted in an airplane, executing a predetermined flight pattern over a geographic area requiring cellular coverage, links calls from cellular phones within the geographic area to a terrestrial base station. Because the airplane is capable of traversing geographic obstacles and takes the place of the cell stations, such a system overcomes the above-mentioned limitations of conventional terrestrial cellular systems.
Despite its many advantages, an airborne cellular system presents design and implementation problems not present in the design and implementation of conventional terrestrial cellular systems. For example, an airborne cellular system requires both a high frequency feeder link to link the base station and the system switch to the airborne repeater, and a subscriber or user link to link the airborne repeater to cellular phones within the area of coverage. As a consequence of the motion of the airplane relative to the base station or cellular phone, an often significant amount of Doppler shift is introduced on the links. As a cellular system such as a TDMA EIA 136 system is sensitive to Doppler shift characteristics, its performance is degraded generally in proportion to the amount of Doppler shift present.
In addition, as the airborne repeater moves as the plane executes its flight pattern, the communication path link distances between the base station and the airplane and the airplane and the system subscribers constantly change. These changes in path link distances cause signal loss to vary. Also, airplane pitch, roll and yaw can move a beam off of its peak gain, thereby increasing the average power consumption of the repeater and associated equipment, increasing dynamic range requirements and increasing the dynamic range and power consumption of the repeater and associated equipment. Consequently, heavier, more expensive and higher power consumption power amplifiers must be used.
Clearly, a need exists for solutions to the foregoing problems.


REFERENCES:
patent: 2598064 (1952-05-01), Lindenblad
patent: 2626348 (1953-01-01), Nobles
patent: 2627021 (1953-01-01), Hansell et al.
patent: 2748266 (1956-05-01), Boyd
patent: 3866227 (1975-02-01), Ruvin
patent: 5063387 (1991-11-01), Mower
patent: 5067172 (1991-11-01), Schloemer
patent: 5123112 (1992-06-01), Choate
patent: 5187805 (1993-02-01), Bertiger et al.
patent: 5455964 (1995-10-01), Roos
patent: 5479482 (1995-12-01), Grimes
patent: 5530909 (1996-06-01), Simon et al.
patent: 5548292 (1996-08-01), Hirschfield et al.
patent: 5557656 (1996-09-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5559865 (1996-09-01), Gilhousen
patent: 5574968 (1996-11-01), Olds et al.
patent: 5613193 (1997-03-01), Ishikawa et al.
patent: 5619211 (1997-04-01), Horkin et al.
patent: 5625867 (1997-04-01), Rouffet et al.
patent: 5657032 (1997-08-01), Liechty et al.
patent: 5678184 (1997-10-01), Cutler, Jr. et al.
patent: 5703595 (1997-12-01), Tayloe et al.
patent: 5774790 (1998-06-01), Dupuy
patent: 5790939 (1998-08-01), Malcolm et al.
patent: 5832380 (1998-11-01), Ray et al.
patent: 5867109 (1999-02-01), Wiedeman
patent: 5874913 (1999-02-01), Blanchard et al.
patent: 5890079 (1999-03-01), Levine
patent: 5937349 (1999-08-01), Andresen
patent: 5974349 (1999-10-01), Levine
patent: 6006084 (1999-12-01), Miller et al.
patent: 6018659 (2000-01-01), Ayyagari et al.
patent: 6058306 (2000-05-01), Liu
patent: 6061561 (2000-05-01), Alanara et al.
patent: 6061562 (2000-05-01), Martin et al.
patent: 6072428 (2000-06-01), Schipper et al.
patent: 6073004 (2000-06-01), Balachandran
patent: 6127946 (2000-10-01), Tzidon et al.
patent: 6246960 (2001-06-01), Lin
patent: 6285878 (2001-09-01), Lai
patent: 6324398 (2001-11-01), Lanzerotti et al.
patent: 6430391 (2002-08-01), Dent et al.
patent: 0 421 704 (1991-04-01), None
patent: 0 618 704 (1994-10-01), None
patent: 0 789 498 (1997-08-01), None
patent: 0 803 742 (1997-10-01), None
patent: 0 837 567 (1997-10-01), None
patent: 0901240 (1999-03-01), None
patent: 0 939 569 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 2757331 (1996-12-01), None
patent: 2318948 (1998-05-01), None
patent: 2 320 992 (1998-07-01), None
patent: 310426 (1991-05-01), None
patent: WO 95 04407 (1995-02-01), None
patent: WO 96 02094 (1996-01-01), None
patent: WO 96 16489 (1996-05-01), None
patent: WO 97 07609 (1997-02-01), None
patent: WO 97 19525 (1997-05-01), None
patent: WO 97 23104 (1997-06-01), None
patent: WO 98 44639 (1998-10-01), None
patent: WO 98 51568 (1998-11-01), None
patent: WO 99 13598 (1999-03-01), None
patent: WO 99 23769 (1999-05-01), None
patent: WO 99 45609 (1999-09-01), None
patent: WO 99 46877 (1999-09-01), None
patent: WO 00 14902 (2000-03-01), None
“51.84 Mbps Airborne Wireless Experiments: A Prelude to the Emerging HALO ™ Communication Technology”, 1999, Jon Aasterud et al.
“Establishing Wireless Communications Services via High-Altitude Aeronautical Platforms: A Concept Whose Time Has Come?” Djuknic et al., IEEE Communications Magazine, Sep. 1, 1997, pp. 128-135.
“On the Use of HALE Platforms as GSM Base Stations”, IEEE Personal Communications, Apr. 2001, vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 37-43.
“Relay Aircraft Enable Cell ‘Network in the Sky’”, William B. Scott, Aviation Week andS Space Technology, Jun. 29, 1998, pp. 22-23.
“Revised Technical And Operational Parameters For Typical IMT-2000 Terrestrial Systems Using High Altitude Platform Stations And CDMA Radio Transmission Technologies”, Radiocommunication Study Groups, Mar. 4, 1999.
Skystation Stratospheric Telecommunication New Payload Description, Mini, Missoni, Pauro, Proceeding of 17 of the AIAA ICSSC, 1997, pp. 235-242.
“Wireless Communication Systems using Stratospheric Platforms”, Hase, Technical Report of IEICE, 2000.
“Airborne Relay Communication System”—System Demonstration—public handout at public demonstration, May 1, 1998, 36 pages.
“Concept Overview”, Angel Technologies Corporation Web Page Printout, (www.angelcorp.com) , Mar. 1998, 7 pages.
“Hail Hale, the Answers May All Be Here”, Thomas W. Will, Ph.D., Joseph N. Pelton, Ph.D., Unmanned Systems Magazine, Winter 1995, pp. 31-34.
“High-Capacity Aerial Vehicles Aid Wireless Communications”, Signal Magazine, Apr. 1997, 6 pages.
“Geosynchronous Satellites at 14 Miles Altitude?”, Joseph N. Pelton, Ph.D., New Telecom Quarterly, Second Quarter 1995 (2Q95) , pp. 11-16.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Doppler correction and path loss compensation for airborne... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Doppler correction and path loss compensation for airborne..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Doppler correction and path loss compensation for airborne... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3253955

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.