Distributed lock manager using a passive, state-full control-ser

Boots – shoes – and leggings

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

364DIG1, 3642468, 3642818, 3642281, G06F 15167

Patent

active

054541085

ABSTRACT:
A locking apparatus for a multicomputer system. The lock apparatus is a two level system wherein local lock managers grant locks on a resource only after they have acquired an appropriate token from a rock control server which is the owner of the resource. The lock control server is passive and has all the control information for a resource it owns. When a local lock manager needs a token in a specified mode for a particular resource, it acquires the token from the lock control server. If there are no conflicting tokens, then the rock control server grants the token. However, if there are conflicting tokens, then the lock control server responds with a list of the local lock managers with conflicting tokens. The requesting lock manager then requests each of the local lock managers with conflicting tokens to give it up and to acknowledge when it has done so. When the acknowledgements have been received, the local lock manager requests the lock control server to update its table and grant the requested token.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4716528 (1987-12-01), Crus et al.
patent: 4965719 (1990-10-01), Shoens et al.
patent: 5063502 (1991-11-01), Jordan, Jr.
patent: 5063504 (1991-11-01), Jordan, Jr.
patent: 5161227 (1992-11-01), Dias et al.
patent: 5175837 (1992-12-01), Arnold et al.
patent: 5202971 (1993-04-01), Henson et al.
patent: 5210848 (1993-05-01), Liu
patent: 5226143 (1993-07-01), Baird et al.
patent: 5226159 (1993-07-01), Henson et al.
patent: 5319780 (1994-06-01), Catino et al.
"Token Ring-Based Distributed Lock Manager", D. M. Dias and B. R. Iyer, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 30, No. 7, Dec. 1987.
"Index Mini-Pages", R. A. Crus, T. R. Malkemus and G. R. Putzolu, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 11A, Apr. 1983.
"Multilevel Locking With Deadlock Avoidance", D. B. Lomet, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 21, No. 4, Sep. 1978.
"Locking Technique In A Relational Data Base-Locking On Intents", K. P. Eswaran, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 18, No. 7, Dec. 1975.
"Modified Multiple Locking Facility", S. C. Parikh, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 3, Aug. 1991.
"Dynamic Check Count Method For Detection Of Concurrent Data Modification", M. L. Holm and G. R. Ricard, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 33,6A Nov. 1990.
"Semantically Rich Set Of Seize Types Using The Classical Shared/Exclusive Seize Model", M. L. Holm, G. R. Ricard, and J. J. Vriezen, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 33, No. 5, Oct., 1990.
"Using Commit Bits To Reduce Locking In Transaction Processing Systems", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 36, No. 9A, Sep. 1993.
"Multigranularity Locking Divergence Control For Epsilon Serializability", K-L. Wu and P. S. Yu, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 36, 6B, Jun. 1993.
"Adaptive Lock Escalation/De-Escalation", M. L. Holm and T. O. McKinley, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 34, No. 8, Jan., 1992.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Distributed lock manager using a passive, state-full control-ser does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Distributed lock manager using a passive, state-full control-ser, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Distributed lock manager using a passive, state-full control-ser will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1558013

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.