Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically...

Details Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically... Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically...

2006-10-26

2011-12-27

Donaghue, Larry (Department: 2454)

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput

Distributed data processing

Processing agent

C709S218000, C709S219000, C715S205000, C715S738000, C715S760000, C715S777000, C715S804000, C718S106000, C345S419000, C345S427000, C345S619000, C345S638000, C345S649000, C345S653000, C345S654000, C345S655000, C345S656000, C707SE17119

Reexamination Certificate

active

08086662

ABSTRACT:
A system allowing a user of a browser program on a computer connected to an open distributed hypermedia system to access and execute an embedded program object. The program object is embedded into a hypermedia document much like data objects. The user may select the program object from the screen. Once selected the program object executes on the user's (client) computer or may execute on a remote server or additional remote computers in a distributed processing arrangement. After launching the program object, the user is able to interact with the object as the invention provides for ongoing interprocess communication between the application object (program) and the browser program. One application of the embedded program object allows a user to view large and complex multi-dimensional objects from within the browser's window. The user can manipulate a control panel to change the viewpoint used to view the image. The invention allows a program to execute on a remote server or other computers to calculate the viewing transformations and send frame data to the client computer thus providing the user of the client computer with interactive features and allowing the user to have access to greater computing power than may be available at the user's client computer.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4815029 (1989-03-01), Barker et al.
patent: 4847604 (1989-07-01), Doyle
patent: 4949248 (1990-08-01), Caro
patent: 5056057 (1991-10-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5146553 (1992-09-01), Noguchi et al.
patent: 5202828 (1993-04-01), Vertelney et al.
patent: 5204947 (1993-04-01), Bernstein et al.
patent: 5206951 (1993-04-01), Khoyi et al.
patent: 5274821 (1993-12-01), Rouquie
patent: 5297249 (1994-03-01), Bernstein et al.
patent: 5307499 (1994-04-01), Yin
patent: 5321806 (1994-06-01), Meinerth et al.
patent: 5321807 (1994-06-01), Mumford
patent: 5321808 (1994-06-01), Rupp
patent: 5339392 (1994-08-01), Risberg
patent: 5347632 (1994-09-01), Filepp et al.
patent: 5367621 (1994-11-01), Cohen
patent: 5367635 (1994-11-01), Bauer et al.
patent: 5390314 (1995-02-01), Swanson
patent: 5410688 (1995-04-01), Williams et al.
patent: 5418908 (1995-05-01), Keller et al.
patent: 5425141 (1995-06-01), Gedye
patent: 5487141 (1996-01-01), Cain et al.
patent: 5495581 (1996-02-01), Tsai
patent: 5499369 (1996-03-01), Atkinson
patent: 5537526 (1996-07-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5544320 (1996-08-01), Konrad
patent: 5557724 (1996-09-01), Sampat et al.
patent: 5581506 (1996-12-01), Yamauchi
patent: 5581686 (1996-12-01), Koppolu et al.
patent: 5581760 (1996-12-01), Atkinson et al.
patent: 5594837 (1997-01-01), Noyes
patent: 5606493 (1997-02-01), Duscher et al.
patent: 5608909 (1997-03-01), Atkinson et al.
patent: 5613058 (1997-03-01), Koppolu et al.
patent: 5613124 (1997-03-01), Atkinson
patent: 5634019 (1997-05-01), Koppolu et al.
patent: 5634129 (1997-05-01), Dickinson
patent: 5652876 (1997-07-01), Ashe et al.
patent: 5669005 (1997-09-01), Curbow
patent: 5694546 (1997-12-01), Reisman
patent: 5710925 (1998-01-01), Leach
patent: 5710928 (1998-01-01), Atkinson
patent: 5717755 (1998-02-01), Shanton
patent: 5732229 (1998-03-01), Dickinson
patent: 5745764 (1998-04-01), Leach et al.
patent: 5752056 (1998-05-01), Celik
patent: 5754175 (1998-05-01), Koppolu et al.
patent: 5778383 (1998-07-01), Grisar
patent: 5778385 (1998-07-01), Pratt
patent: 5787448 (1998-07-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 5801701 (1998-09-01), Koppolu et al.
patent: 5805885 (1998-09-01), Leach
patent: 5812862 (1998-09-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5838906 (1998-11-01), Doyle et al.
patent: 5848429 (1998-12-01), McEntee et al.
patent: 5877765 (1999-03-01), Dickman
patent: 6055514 (2000-04-01), Wren
patent: 6064406 (2000-05-01), Atkinson
patent: 6240465 (2001-05-01), Leach
patent: 6269403 (2001-07-01), Anders
patent: 6412020 (2002-05-01), Leach
patent: 6526454 (2003-02-01), Williams et al.
patent: 6618754 (2003-09-01), Gosling
patent: 7016084 (2006-03-01), Tsai
patent: 7599985 (2009-10-01), Doyle et al.
patent: 4440598 (1996-05-01), None
patent: 0384986 (1990-05-01), None
patent: 0483576 (1992-05-01), None
patent: 0650126 (1995-04-01), None
Microsoft's Offer of Proof and Motion to Reconsider Regarding Revision of Claim Construction (1:99-cv-00626) (N. D. Ill Apr. 26, 2007).
Declaration of Dr. John P.J. Kelly in Support of Microsoft's Offer of Proof of Non-infringement (1:99-cv-00626) (N. D. Ill Apr. 26, 2007).
Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant Microsoft Corporation (04-1234) (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2004).
Brief of Defendant-Appellant Microsoft Corporation (04-1234) (Fed. Cir. Jun. 3, 2004).
Transcript of Trial Testimony of John Kelly, pp. 2640-2862 (1:99-cv-00626) (N. D. Ill. Jul. 31, 2003).
Supplemental Expert Witness Report or Larry S. Nixon Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2)(B) (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2007).
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Offer of Proof and Motion to Reconsider Regarding Revision of Claim Construction (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct and Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend its Answer and Counterclaim (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2007).
Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. John P.J. Kelly Regarding Invalidity of United States Patent No. 5,838,906 (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 21, 2007).
Corrected Supplemental Expert Witness Report of Larry S. Nixon Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2)(B) (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 22, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Amend its Answer and Counterclaim (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 30, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Status Statement for May 31, 2007 Hearing (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 30, 2007).
Microsoft's Status Report for May 31, 2007 Hearing (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 29, 2007).
Defendant Microsoft's Motion to Continue Trial Pending Newly-Declared Interference in the PTO Between the '906 Patent and Microsoft's Koppolu Patent (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 29, 2007).
Defendant Microsoft's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend its Answer and Counterclaim (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 25 2007).
Plaintiffs'Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Continue Trial (1:99-cv-00626) (N.D. Ill. May 30, 2007).
Eolasv.MicrosoftCombined Petition of Microsoft Corporation for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc (Appeal No. 04-1234 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—Mar. 16, 2005).
Declaration of Interference,Doylev.Koppolu, Patent Interference 105,563 McK (May 24, 2007).
Ex Parte Srinivasa R. Koppolu, C. Douglas Hodges, Barry B. MacKichan, Richard McDaniel, Rao V. Remala, and Antony S. Williams, App. No. 2005-1431 (B.P.A.I. May 24, 2007).
Koppolu Motion 2 (for judgement based on Doyle inequitable conduct),Doylev.Koppolu, Patent Interference 105,563 McK (Aug. 15, 2007)
Judgment,Doylev.Koppolu, Patent Interference 105,563 McK (Sep. 25, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Local Rule 56.1 (a) Response to Defendant's Statement of Additional Facts regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct and Exhibits ,Eolasv.Microsoft, Case No. 99 C 0626 (Jul. 19, 2007).
Defendant Microsoft's Local Rule 56.1 (a) Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Additional Facts regarding Microsoft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Obviousness and Exhibits,Eolasv.Microsoft, Case No. 99 C 0626 (Jul. 18, 2007).
Reply in Support of Microsoft's Motion for Summary Judgment of Obviousness and Exhibits,Eolasv.Microsoft, Case No. 99 C 0626 (Jul. 18, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct,Eolasv.Microsoft, Case No. 99 C 0626 (Jul. 18, 2007).
Declaration of Edward W. Felton in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Microsoft's Motion for Summary Judgment,Eolasv.Microsoft, Case No. 99 C 0626 (Jul. 9, 2007).
Plaintiffs' Local Rule

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Distributed hypermedia method and system for automatically... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4265204