Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Mechanical measurement system
Reexamination Certificate
1998-03-04
2001-03-06
Shah, Kamini (Department: 2857)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system in a specific environment
Mechanical measurement system
C702S181000, C706S020000, C706S912000, C318S806000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06199018
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to systems and methods for diagnosing machines and, in particular, to systems and methods for predicting the expected lifetime for and the failure of rotating machines.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Presently, many industrial process and operations depend on the proper and continued operation of machines and, in particular, on the proper and continued operation of rotating machines such as motors. The number of such rotating machines in operation today is significant. For example, some have estimated that approximately 70% of all of the electricity produced in this country goes to power rotating machines. Further, the proper operation of such machines can have a significant economic impact on the operation of industrial plants as the failure of a key machine, for even a short time period, can cause an entire assembly line to come to a halt. In certain industries, for example the paper mill industry, typical motor failure can result in costs in excess of $20,000 per hour when the motor is down.
In an effort to ensure reliable and continued operation of such machines, and to avoid unexpected failures, many have attempted to employ non-intrusive diagnostic or monitoring methods or systems to locally monitor such machines in an effort to determine and, ideally, predict machine failure. One goal of such systems and methods is to allow their users to identify potential problems at an early stage and either take steps to avoid the potential problem or replace the suspect machinery.
Despite the widespread interest in diagnostic systems as described above, a practical, reliable, low cost and convenient diagnostic system for machines in an industrial environment has not yet been developed. This is especially true with respect to rotating machines such as motors, where the absence of an effective, low-cost diagnostic system or method of diagnosing motor health and life prediction is noticeable.
Prior art attempts to develop effective motor diagnostic systems and methods have been limited. The vast majority of such systems simply locally monitor a specific machine according to a fixed monitoring process to determine whether it is operating within a “fault state” (i.e., a limited, predefined operating state) or a “no-fault state.” These systems, while providing some slight advance warning before a machine fails, do not provide information of the type that may be readily used for preventative maintenance or for scheduled replacement of certain machines. Also, the local monitoring processes used in such systems typically are derived from laboratory tests on related machines and are, thus, not highly accurate in field situations.
In addition to the above, many known motor diagnostic systems and methods require the use of complicated, space-requiring, and expensive detectors and/or transducers for proper operation. For example, when dealing with variable speed motors, one of the key parameters often used in known systems is the rotational speed of the rotor. Often, the rotational speed is determined through the use of an encoder or other similar device which includes a rotating member coupled to the rotor of the motor and a stationary member that is coupled the stator and that interacts with the rotating member to produce an output signal representative of the rotational speed of the rotor. The components required by such encoders often require space that could otherwise be effectively used, result in increased motor costs, and are subject to failure and/or breakage. Accordingly, many known diagnostic systems are necessarily limited because of their dependence on such speed-sensing devices.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome these, and other limitations of the prior art. Other objects of the present invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a distributive diagnostic system is provided for monitoring a plurality of machines where the system includes a plurality of local monitoring devices, where each local monitoring device is adapted to receive local data concerning at least one machine associated with the local monitoring device, and where each local monitoring device further includes a data processor adapted to: (i) communicate the local data concerning its associated machine and (ii) analyze the local data concerning its associated machine using a set of provided parameters for local diagnostics of the machine. The exemplary system also includes a global data processor coupled to the plurality of local monitoring devices, where the global data processor is adapted to receive from each local monitoring device the local data concerning its associated machine and where, in response to the local data from the plurality of local monitoring devices, the global data processor generates the set of provided parameters for each local monitoring device.
Other exemplary embodiments of the present invention and other features of the present invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4470092 (1984-09-01), Lombardi
patent: 4525763 (1985-06-01), Hardy et al.
patent: 4659976 (1987-04-01), Johanson
patent: 4761703 (1988-08-01), Kliman et al.
patent: 4839830 (1989-06-01), Amey et al.
patent: 5019760 (1991-05-01), Chu et al.
patent: 5189350 (1993-02-01), Mallett
patent: 5323325 (1994-06-01), Izumiya
patent: 5485491 (1996-01-01), Salnick et al.
patent: 5530343 (1996-06-01), Bowers, III et al.
patent: 5576632 (1996-11-01), Petsche et al.
patent: 5629870 (1997-05-01), Farag et al.
patent: 5631839 (1997-05-01), Lemoine
patent: 5680025 (1997-10-01), Bowers, III et al.
patent: 5710723 (1998-01-01), Hoth et al.
patent: 5726911 (1998-03-01), Canada et al.
patent: 5744723 (1998-04-01), Piety
patent: 2 681 942 (1993-04-01), None
IQ Prealert Intelligent Monitoring To Extend The Productive Life Of 21st Century Motor-Dependent Processes, Rockwell Automation, © 1996 by Reliance Electric Industrial Co., Cleveland, OH.
IQ Intelligent AC Motors With Prealert Technology “The World's First Truly Intelligent Motor”, Rockwell Automation, © 1997 by Reliance Electric Industrial Co., Cleveland, OH.
IQ Pre-Alert Overview, Rockwell Automation, Sep. 10, 1997 by Reliance Electric Industrial Co., Cleveland, OH.
Intelligent Motor Technology, Rockwell Automation, May 8, 1997 by Reliance Electric Industrial Co., Cleveland, OH.
Thomas G. Habetler, “On-Line Mechanical Fault Detection In Induction Machines Using Stator Current Monitoring,” IEEE IAS '95 Tutorial, Oct. 8, 1995, Atlanta, GA.
Jonathan D. Gardell, “Las Motor Condition Monitoring Tutorial,” Electrical Machines Committee IAS Annual Meeting, Conventional Motor Protection Systems, Oct. 6, 1996, San Diego, CA.
Alexej Barkov and Natalja Barkova, “Condition Assessment and Life Prediction of Rolling Elements Bearings—Part 2,” pp. 27-31, Sound and Vibrations, Sep. 1995.
S. F. Farag and Mike Jhaveri, “Intelligent Microprocessor Based Devices Provide Advanced Motor Protection, Flexible Control, and Communication in Paper Mills”, pp. 1-9, May 31, 1996.
G.B. Kliman, W.J. Premerlani, R.A. Koegl & D. Hoeweler, “A New Approach to On-Line Turn Fault Detection in AC Motor,” pp. 687-693, IEEE, 1966.
B.R. Upadhyaya, J.E. Banks, “Advanced Maintenance Technology,” pp. 37-41, P/PM Technology, Apr. 1996.
B.A. Lloyd, G.C. Stone and J. Stein, “Motor Insulation Condition Assessment Using Expert Systems Software,” pp. 60-67, IEEE, 1994.
Bekir Karlik and Kayhan Gulez, “The Performance Analysis of Induction Motors With Artificial Neural Networks,” pp. 1452-1455, IEEE, 1995.
Mark M. Hodowanec, “Considerations of Coupling Selection, Installation and Alignment: Effects on Motor Mechanical Performance,” pp. 122-131, IEEE, 1996.
Michael Babb, “Motor Overload Protection Becomes ‘Communications-Capable’,” pp. 69-72, Control Engineering, Jun. 1996.
Stanislaw F. Legowski, A.H.M. Sandrul Ula and Andrzej M. Trz
Alguindigue Israel E.
Bauer Robert P.
Bonnett Austin H.
Buckley George William
Divljakovic Vojislav
Emerson Electric Co.
Luedeka Neely & Graham P.C.
Shah Kamini
LandOfFree
Distributed diagnostic system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Distributed diagnostic system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Distributed diagnostic system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2438344