Surgery – Means and methods for collecting body fluids or waste material – Aspiration collection container or trap
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-27
2004-03-30
Lo, Weilun (Department: 3761)
Surgery
Means and methods for collecting body fluids or waste material
Aspiration collection container or trap
Reexamination Certificate
active
06712799
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates to a system that can be used to withdraw liquids from a patient in a medical environment by a means of a chest tube, and, more particularly, to a thoracic drainage system having an improved, disposable component.
There are in use today, a considerable selection of thoracic drainage systems that carry out the withdrawal of liquids from a patient. In general, after many surgical operations, there is a need to remove certain liquids from a patient and, in particular, there is a need to remove fluids from the thoracic cavity of the patient. Such fluids build up after surgery and include secretions such as blood and plasma that accumulate and must therefore be removed from the patient to prevent such build up from becoming harmful to the patient.
Typically, such systems for the removal of the fluids comprise three basic components that are used in conjunction with the chest tube and the various tubes that are used to connect those components together and to a vacuum system within the hospital. First, fluids removed from the patient via a chest tube are collected in a collection chamber where those fluids are accumulated and the collection chamber is either periodically emptied or disposed of altogether. Next, there is a water seal that is used to prevent ambient air from reaching the chest cavity as well as to provide a visual indication to the caregiver of a possible leak in the overall thoracic drainage system. Lastly, there is a vacuum control that regulates the amount of vacuum that is applied to the system from the source of vacuum provided generally by the hospital central vacuum system or may be through the use of a localized vacuum source.
In the past, the various functions of the aforementioned components were carried out by the use of three individual bottles. One of the bottles collected the liquid from the patient, a second bottle provided the function of a water seal to prevent the back flow of ambient air into the chest cavity and third bottle acted like a regulator and comprised a water manometer having a fixed height of water such that when the vacuum exceeded a predetermined level, air would pass into the water manometer and limit the level of vacuum to the thoracic drainage system and ultimately, of course, to the patient cavity. By changing the level or height of the water, different maximum levels of vacuum could be attained.
The three bottle system, however, left a considerable number of parameters undecided and was sometimes difficult and tedious to set up properly by the user that had to be trained in the set up procedures. Accordingly, to counter those problems, various systems were devised that integrated all of the aforementioned three functions into a single apparatus. Thus, the usual apparatus today collectively incorporates a collection container or chamber, a water seal and a means of regulating the amount of vacuum to the overall system. An example of such apparatus is shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,363,626 of Bidwell et al where a single, disposable underwater drainage unit is disclosed where a transparent plastic unit is provided to carry out all of the steps of a collection container, an underwater seal chamber and a water manometer incorporated therein and which eliminates the set up procedures used with the three bottle system and thus reduces the possibilities of an incorrect coupling or filling of the individual bottles. Thus, the emphasis of such systems is in the incorporation into a single apparatus, of all of the three functions of the normal thoracic drainage system, that is, the collection chamber, the water seal and water manometer
Typical today of such systems is the Pleur-evac apparatus manufactured and marketed by Deknatel, Snowden, Pencer or DSP and the entire apparatus is constructed so as to be disposable and to integrate into a single apparatus, the functions of the water manometer, the water seal and the collection chamber. Other such apparatus are commercially marketed by Sherwood Medical and Baxter Healthcare and all are typical of the systems currently marketed for the drainage of the thoracic cavity and all incorporate the functions of a vacuum regulator, water seal and collection chamber into an integrated apparatus. With such integrated systems, however, the overall cost of the apparatus is still relatively high and it is not always cost effective to dispose of the entire apparatus after each patient. There is, in such systems a considerable expenditure of money that is totally lost after use on one patient. Even though easier to assemble and possibly less expensive than having three separate components for the three functions, the overall cost of an integrated apparatus still is quite substantial and it would be advantageous to have a thoracic drainage system serving the full functions of such a system but at a lesser cost to the hospital.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to have a plural drainage apparatus or system that can employ, to the extent possible, standard components, such as, for example, the collection container since collection containers are readily available by themselves and are very inexpensive, as compared with an entire thoracic drainage apparatus and the disposal of a collection chamber can be very cost efficient to simply be discarded after its use with an individual patient. As such, it would be a cost savings to take advantage of the many collection chambers that are currently available in the marketplace from a number of companies that simply collect fluids for disposal and due to the high usage of such collection chambers, the cost of such containers is very low.
There is also available, an improved vacuum regulator that is specially adapted for use with thoracic drainage and which is marketed by Datex-Ohmeda, Inc, the present assignee, and which is capable of providing the precise levels and ranges of vacuum needed for thoracic drainage having the characteristics of relatively high flow and low impedance, i.e. a level of vacuum between a negative pressure of about 5 cm. water to about 50 cm. water and therefore is a reusable component that can be used with multiple patients and not disposed of after each use. By the use of such a regulator, that component can be used repetitively and the cost, therefore, not wasted after the use on a single patient.
In addition, it is advantage for the caregiver to continually visually monitor the water seal function of the apparatus as it provides an indication of the presence of a leak in the overall system. For example, if bubbles are continually being formed in the water seal component, it is generally an indication that there is an air leak into the system and the leak can thereafter be traced by occluding the drainage tubing at various locations to ascertain the location of that leak. However, with an integrated system, the collection chamber where the liquids from the patient are being collected must be located below the patient, or, more specifically, below the particular cavity that is being drained by the system, in order to prevent a siphoning effect that can return liquid accumulated in the collection chamber back to the patient. As such, the typical integrated apparatus must itself be located below the patient, generally on the floor of the patient room and thus it is quite inconvenient for the caregiver to be able to visually check the functioning of the water seal to ascertain and verify its proper operation. It would, obviously be more advantageous if the water seal component or function were located at a convenient height for the caregiver and preferable at the eye level of that caregiver.
Too, with the present integrated thoracic drainage systems, in the event it is necessary to move a patient from one location to another, the apparatus must, of course, be disconnected from the source of vacuum in order to make such movement. With the integrated apparatus, the apparatus itself is also normally disconnected as it is cumbersome to move that apparatus that includes various liquids within the col
Jones Thomas C.
Waddell Paula M.
Bogart Michael
Datex-Ohmada, Inc.
Rathbun Roger M.
LandOfFree
Disposable water seal for thoracic regulators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Disposable water seal for thoracic regulators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Disposable water seal for thoracic regulators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3251066