Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Plural physical display element control system – Display elements arranged in matrix
Reexamination Certificate
2010-02-23
2011-10-11
Osorio, Ricardo L (Department: 2629)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Plural physical display element control system
Display elements arranged in matrix
C345S099000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08035597
ABSTRACT:
In the display device and the display method of the present invention, a scanning signal line driving circuit controls falls of a scanning signal line, so as to make level shifts occurring to pixel potentials substantially uniform throughout display plane, the level shifts being caused by parasitic capacitances which parasitically exist in scanning signal lines. Fall waveforms of the scanning signal change at a change rate Sx which is a change quantity per unit time, and by desirably setting the change rate Sx, a change rate Sx1in the vicinity of an input-side end of the scanning signal line and a change rate SxN in the vicinity of the other end thereof are substantially equal to each other, not being influenced by signal delay transmission characteristic which the scanning signal line possesses, like scanning signal line waveforms Vg(1, j) and Vg(N, j).
REFERENCES:
patent: 3909804 (1975-09-01), Kaji et al.
patent: 4225318 (1980-09-01), Wrigley, Jr.
patent: 4893117 (1990-01-01), Blomley et al.
patent: 4917470 (1990-04-01), Okada et al.
patent: 4955697 (1990-09-01), Tsukada et al.
patent: 5081400 (1992-01-01), Weber et al.
patent: 5179371 (1993-01-01), Yamazaki
patent: 5398043 (1995-03-01), Takeda et al.
patent: 5408226 (1995-04-01), Kwon
patent: 5587722 (1996-12-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 5606342 (1997-02-01), Shoji et al.
patent: 5657037 (1997-08-01), Okada et al.
patent: 5663741 (1997-09-01), Kanazawa
patent: 5684501 (1997-11-01), Knapp et al.
patent: 5714968 (1998-02-01), Ikeda
patent: 5745086 (1998-04-01), Weber
patent: 5748169 (1998-05-01), Okumura et al.
patent: 5754155 (1998-05-01), Kubota et al.
patent: 5774099 (1998-06-01), Iwasaki et al.
patent: 5777591 (1998-07-01), Katoh et al.
patent: 5784039 (1998-07-01), Yasui et al.
patent: 5790087 (1998-08-01), Shigeta et al.
patent: 5798744 (1998-08-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 5844534 (1998-12-01), Okumura et al.
patent: 5877736 (1999-03-01), Imajo et al.
patent: 5896117 (1999-04-01), Moon
patent: 5982344 (1999-11-01), Tokunaga
patent: 5995074 (1999-11-01), Kusafuka et al.
patent: 5995075 (1999-11-01), Vignolle
patent: 6020687 (2000-02-01), Hirakawa et al.
patent: 6191769 (2001-02-01), Fujiwara et al.
patent: 6225992 (2001-05-01), Hsu et al.
patent: 6229531 (2001-05-01), Nakajima et al.
patent: 6295042 (2001-09-01), Aoki
patent: 6359607 (2002-03-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 6362803 (2002-03-01), Tomomura et al.
patent: 6867760 (2005-03-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 7027024 (2006-04-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 7304626 (2007-12-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 7696969 (2010-04-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 2001/0033266 (2001-10-01), Lee
patent: 0 574 920 (1993-12-01), None
patent: 61-70430 (1986-05-01), None
patent: 63-198022 (1988-08-01), None
patent: 1-320813 (1989-12-01), None
patent: 02-129618 (1990-05-01), None
patent: 02-272490 (1990-11-01), None
patent: 03-294822 (1991-12-01), None
patent: 04-225318 (1992-08-01), None
patent: 04-265991 (1992-09-01), None
patent: 4-324418 (1992-11-01), None
patent: 04-324418 (1992-11-01), None
patent: 04-324419 (1992-11-01), None
patent: 06-003647 (1994-01-01), None
patent: 06-043833 (1994-02-01), None
patent: 06-082828 (1994-03-01), None
patent: 06-110035 (1994-04-01), None
patent: 06-266313 (1994-09-01), None
patent: 07-120720 (1995-05-01), None
patent: 08-201771 (1996-08-01), None
patent: 09-258174 (1997-10-01), None
patent: 2000-100065 (2000-01-01), None
U.S. Appl. No. 11/898,559, filed Sep. 13, 2007; Yanagi et al.
Japanese Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2007.
Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2005 (w/English translation thereof).
Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2005 (w/English translation thereof).
Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 17, 2005 (w/English translation thereof).
Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2004 (w/English translation thereof).
Notice of Commission Decision Not to Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337 finding USP7,304,626 valid and infringed; Request for Written Submissions Regarding Remedy, Bonding, and The Public Interest, Investigation No. 337-TA-634 before US International Trade Commission, Sep. 9, 2009.
Final Initial and Recommended Determinations finding USP7,304,626 valid and infringed, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Jun. 12, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 9, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 10, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 11, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 12, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 13, 2009.
Public Transcript of Hearing before Administrative Law Judge Paul J. Luckern in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Feb. 14, 2009.
Rebuttal Report of Expert Roger G. Stewart re: U.S. Patent No. 7,304,626 in ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Sep. 26, 2008.
Initial Expert Report of Richard A. Flasck ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-634, Sep. 5, 2008.
The Samsung Defendants' Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3-3 re: U.S. Patent 7,027,024, Case No. 2-07CV-330 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Aug. 18, 2008.
Complaint Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Complainant Sharp Corporation, Respondents, Samsung Electronics Col., Ltd. et al., ITC Investigation No. 337-Ta-634, Jan. 30, 2008.
Defendants Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP's Answer and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 2:07-Cv-330 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Nov. 7, 2007 .
The Optimum Driving Method of a-Si TFT-LCD, Naoaki et al., NII-Electronic Library Service, pp. 21-26.
“Development of a Simulation Technique for Thin-Film Transistor Liquid-Crystal Displays”, Ohta et al., Electronics and Communications in Japan (Part II: Electronics) vol. 78, Issue 3, pp. 97-105; Mar. 1995.
13.6-inch Diagonal, 4,096-Color TFT-LCD for Workstations, M. Shibusawa, Electron Device Engineering Lab., pp. 587-590.
Gibson Dunn, Jan. 24, 2011, Transmittal of Complaint under 19 USC § 1337.
Gibson Dunn, Mar. 22, 2011, Transmittal of Amended Complaint Under 19 Usc § 1337.
Response of Respondents AU Optronics Corporation America and AU Optronics Corp. to the Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Respondent Benq Corporation to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Respondent Benq America Corp. To the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Respondent Haier America Trading LLC to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Respondent Haier Group Corporation to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Respondents LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response of Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. to Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation Under Section 337.
Response of Sanyo North America Corporation to Amended Complaint and Notice of Investigation Under Section 337.
Response to Respondent TCL Corporation to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response to Respondent TTE Technology, Inc. to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Response to respondent Vizio, Inc. to the Complaint and Notice of Investigation.
Miyata Hidekazu
Morii Hideki
Yanagi Toshihiro
Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.
Osorio Ricardo L
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
LandOfFree
Display device and display method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Display device and display method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Display device and display method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4282731