Radiant energy – Invisible radiant energy responsive electric signalling
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-20
2003-01-21
Hannaher, Constantine (Department: 2878)
Radiant energy
Invisible radiant energy responsive electric signalling
C250S370090, C250S370110
Reexamination Certificate
active
06509565
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a charge detector for reading charge produced by an active pixel in the detector.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A known diagnostic technique used in tomography for locating tumors involves injecting into a patient's bloodstream a radioisotope which targets the tumor, so that the location of the tumor can be derived by detecting the location of the radioisotope. Typically, the radioisotope emits &ggr;-rays which are dispersed from the tumor site. In order to achieve the desired detection so as to determine the precise location of the tumor, it is necessary to image the patient's body in such a manner as to detect only those &ggr;-rays which are emitted normally from the body and to ignore those &ggr;-rays which are dispersed in other directions.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,656,818 (Nygård) assigned to the one of present applicants discloses such a radiation imaging system that includes a detector unit and a receiver unit. The detector unit includes a two-dimensional sensor, first and second amplifier channels, first and second multiplicity generators and first and second address generators. The two-dimensional sensor includes first and second sensing elements that sense radiation in a first direction and a second direction, respectively. Each first amplifier channel generates an output signal based on a detection output from a corresponding one of the first sensing elements. The first multiplicity generator generates a first multiplicity signal representing a number of the first amplifier channels generating output signals. The first address generator generates a first analog address of a first amplifier channel associated with a received output signal. The second amplifier channels, second multiplicity generator and second address generator operate in like manner with respect to the second sensing elements. The receiver unit includes converters for converting the first and second analog addresses into first and second digital addresses. The receiver unit also includes a tester for testing whether the first and second digital addresses represent a valid position address in the first and second direction based on the first and second multiplicity signals.
Different types of computer tomography are known in which such a radiation imaging system may be embodied. In Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) more than one detector is rotated around the subject. During the rotation of the detector, the counting of the gamma rays is repeated. Then, the radioisotope's distribution (tomographic image) is reconstructed based on the obtained count values of the &ggr;-rays.
In contrast to SPECT where a radioisotope in the body emits &ggr;-rays produced by a single photon, in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) a patient is administered a radioisotope that emits positrons (i.e. positively charged electrons). When the positrons meet electrons within the body, the positrons and electrons mutually annihilate and produce two &ggr;-rays that propagate away from each other at an angle of 180° and are detected by respective detector elements in the PET scanner. The scanner's readout electronics record the detected &ggr;-rays and map an image of the area where the radioisotope is located. Here also two simultaneous detections are indicative of a positron emission from the tumor site.
Thus, in PET two simultaneous &ggr;-rays must be detected on opposite sides of the patient's body. The positrons are extremely short lived and simultaneity implies that the two &ggr;-rays can both be detected within a short time window, which is 10 ns, for example. The PET scanner surrounds the patient like a CT scanner and typically comprises in the order of 200,000 pixels on detector elements. Thus, it is necessary to detect two excited pixels within a short time difference and then to read out the energy of these two pixels. Only if the energy of each active pixel equals about 511 keV, (i.e. the energy of the incident &ggr;-radiation) are the two photons the result of positron-electron annihilation and thus indicative of the tumor's location. Also in a PET scanner Compton scattering can occur within the detector, whereby a photon is only partially absorbed by the pixel and partially scattered to another pixel or occasionally to even more than a single pixel. In this case the sum of the energies of simultaneous active pixels will be equal to about 511 keV.
Additionally, there is another apparatus which is called Compton Camera. In the Compton Camera in order to determine the location of the &ggr;-ray based on the detection of the single photon thus emitted, it is necessary that Compton scattering occur, so that another photon will be emitted substantially simultaneously, thereby allowing the angle of the incident &ggr;-ray to be calculated.
Here, too, it is necessary to establish simultaneity of a &ggr;-ray striking multiple pixels, although Compton Camera and PET must detect simultaneous &ggr;-rays and so the time difference for establishing simultaneity of two or more pixels becoming active is more critical than SPECT.
In EP 893 705 published on Jan. 27, 1999 entitled “Multi-Channel Readinig Circuit for Particle Detector” and assigned to one of the present applicants, there is described a method for reading an array of pixels in a 2-dimensional image sensor so as to reduce the time taken to detect a single “active” pixel. The reading circuit described in EP 893 705 uses two detectors for detecting Compton scattering, requiring that data be read out in the first detector from a large number of addressable pixels along respective channels in order to detect which pixel is “active”. This is done by first integrating the charge associated with each pixel using an integrator in the form of an operational transconductance amplifier having a feedback capacitor. The integrated charge pulse is then amplified and shaped and the resulting analog signal is sampled and held, allowing its magnitude to be measured. In order to measure the peak magnitude of the shaped signal, the shaped signal must be very accurately sampled at the peak value. This requires an accurate determination of the peak time T
P
that occurs a fixed time difference T
P
after the emission of charge by the excited pixel. The fixed time difference T
P
is a function of the RC time constant of the shaper circuit and is therefore known.
Thus, in order to know when to sample the integrated charge signal, the time of occurrence of each charge emission must itself be accurately determined. In EP 893 705, this is done by using a fast shaper having a very fast time constant to determine the peak time of the signal, being the time taken for it to cross a threshold value as measured by a threshold discriminator. This having been done, all that is then necessary is to sample the held integrated charge sample after a time difference T
P
. A reading system for reading out the charge signals must therefore generate an accurate trigger simultaneous with the occurrence of each charge emission.
It is apparent that the accuracy with which the time of occurrence to of each charge emission is determined is a function of the accuracy with which the event can be discriminated. In practice, the threshold discrimination is susceptible to various types of error, as will now be explained, which can affect the accuracy with which the trigger event can be discriminated. As noted above, this may not be quite so critical in SPECT-type scanners but that can indeed be critical in PET-type scanners and in the Compton Camera where simultaneity of two events must be determined.
FIG. 1
shows a partial detail of a prior art reading PET-type nuclear imaging system
10
. The nuclear imaging system comprises a detector
11
(constituting a charge readout sensor) that surrounds a patient (not shown) and is shown only partially in the figure and comprises multiple detector segments
12
. Each detector segment
12
is shown as having an array of 512 pixels
13
constituted by scintillators and photomultiplier tubes that are r
Nygard Einar
Yamakawa Tsutomu
Fitch Even Tabin & Flannery
Hannaher Constantine
Ideas ASA
Moran Timothy
LandOfFree
Discriminator circuit for a charge detector does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Discriminator circuit for a charge detector, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Discriminator circuit for a charge detector will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3018750