Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid
Reexamination Certificate
1994-11-04
2002-06-25
Gitomer, Ralph (Department: 1623)
Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or...
Involving nucleic acid
C435S034000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06410223
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
Existing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques have provided sensitive and specific means for detecting DNA-containing analytes. The need for time-consuming and expensive Southern blots for detecting very small amounts and a requirement for cell lysis and DNA extraction, however, have provided an incentive for simplification of the procedure. This invention relates to a two-step direct PCR method which combines biological and enzymatic amplification of PCR targets and simplifies the procedures for sample processing.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Conventional hybridization assay methods utilizing DNA as the means for determining the presence of a given analyte in a sample have been practiced for many years, but there have been problems and drawbacks associated with this method, such as a lack of sensitivity and specificity as well as the time required to carry out the assay. The advent of the polymerase chain reaction eliminated many of these concerns, e.g. sensitivity has been increased to the extent that the detection of a single cell in a sample is theoretically possible, but, while specificity and sensitivity have been increased, the method often requires time-consuming and expensive Southern blots in order to detect small numbers of cells.
In addition, some samples, such as soil (Bej et al. 1991.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
vol. 57, pp. 1013-1017), food products (Rossen et al. 1992.
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
vol. 17, pp. 37-45) and plant leaves (Demeke and Adams. 1992.
Biotechniques,
vol. 12, pp. 332-334; Rowhani et al. 1993.
Phytopathology.
vol. 83, pp. 749-7535), may also contain inhibitors of PCR (Prosen et al. 1993.
Phytopathology.
vol. 83, pp. 965-970; Rasmussen and Wulf. 1991. Detection of
Pseudomonas syringae
pv.
pisi
using PCR. pp. 369-376, and Tourte and Manceau. 1991. Direct detection of
Pseudomonas syringae
pathovar
phaseolicola
using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). pp. 402-403 both in:
Proceedings
4
th International Working Group on Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars.
Internat. Soc. Plant Pathology Committee on Phytopath. Bact. and Univ. di Firenze, Inst. di Pathologia, Florence, Italy) which are not easily removed by standard extraction procedures. For example, in studies (Prosen et al., supra) utilizing DNA from seed extracts containing relatively small numbers of pathogen, it was determined that cfu's (on average 12 cfu/reaction) gave variable results in replicate amplifications. In contrast, tests with direct nested PCR carried out with culture aliquots without prior DNA extraction consistently gave strong PCR bands.
Another general problem with PCR techniques is the inability to differentiate between dead cells and live cells, which is important in many phytosanitary applications.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To overcome these problems we have developed a novel technique which can specifically detect viable cells in any environmental sample. To accomplish this goal, we have combined biological preamplification on a growth medium with direct PCR by introducing a plating step prior to PCR analysis. This modification, which we have named BIO-PCR, provides the benefit of biological amplification of PCR targets prior to enzymatic amplification. The technique significantly improves detection in samples with low levels of contamination and greatly reduces the detection of dead cells and/or free DNA.
In accordance with this development, it is the object of the invention to provide a novel assay method which combines a culture step and a direct polymerase chain reaction step resulting in a method having increased specificity and sensitivity and decreased interference from contaminants such as inhibitors and dead cells.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4358535 (1982-11-01), Falkow
patent: 4683202 (1987-07-01), Mullis et al.
patent: 5234824 (1993-08-01), Mullis
patent: 5436144 (1995-07-01), Stewart et al.
Schaad et al., Plant Pathology, Beyond 2000, Abstracts of Presentations, Nov. 8, 1993.*
Maniatis T., Molecular Cloning, A Lab Manual Cold Spring Harbor Lab 1982.*
Petitjean J., Specific Detection of Enteroviruses . . . J of Clin Microbiol 28 (2) 1990 pp. 307-311.*
Oshiro R., Modification of Reagents in the Enviroamp . . . Can J Microbiol 40 (6) 1994 pp. 495-499.*
Nitschke et al.,BioTechniques, vol. 14(6), pp. 914-916 (1993).
Udy et al.,Technique—A J. of Methods in Cell and Mol. Biol., vol. 2(2), pp. 88-92 (1990).
Scaad et al.,Plant Pathology, Beyond 2000, Abstracts of Presentations (Nov. 1993).
Fitter et al.,J. of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 73, pp. 53-59 (1992).
Rossen et al.,Int. J. of Food Microb., vol. 17, pp. 37-45 (1992).
Hatziloukas Efstathios
Panopoulos Nikolas J.
Schaad Norman W.
Fado John D.
Gitomer Ralph
Graeter Janelle S.
Silverstein M. Howard
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of
LandOfFree
Direct polymerase chain reaction assay, or bio-PCR does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Direct polymerase chain reaction assay, or bio-PCR, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Direct polymerase chain reaction assay, or bio-PCR will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2969680