Special receptacle or package – For holding a machine readable recording medium – For holding an optical disc
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-07
2002-06-04
Luong, Shian (Department: 3728)
Special receptacle or package
For holding a machine readable recording medium
For holding an optical disc
C206S310000, C206S493000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06398022
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a storage case for optically readable digital versatile disks otherwise known as digital video disks or DVD's. More specifically, the DVD holder of the present invention includes an improved central retaining area for retention of the DVD.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Optically readable data disks of the type used for recording data, video, audio and the like are sold by the millions. Common examples of these media include CD's, interactive games, software and recently DVD's. These disks are typically stored in plastic boxes known by the term “jewel boxes”. Typically, these jewel boxes include a central disk retaining area that is inserted through the central hole of the disk, thereby retaining the disk it in its position. The disk is typically removed from the jewel box by exerting finger pressure on a central button like member thereby ejecting the disk. Prior art examples of jewel boxes of this nature are disclosed in the following prior art U.S. Patents:
1. U.S. Pat. No. 5,944,181, issued to Lau on Aug. 31, 1999 entitled Disk Protective Enclosure and assigned to Finest Industrial Co. Ltd.
2. U.S. Pat. No. 5,788,068 issued to Fraser et al on Aug. 4, 1998 entitled Apparatus for Holding a Compact Disk and assigned to Dubois Limited.
3. U.S. Pat. No. 5,526,926 issued to Deja on Jun. 18, 1996 entitled Storage Case for Compact Discs and assigned to Viva Magnetics Limited.
Typically, the prior art in the field of jewel boxes include a central disk retaining area that includes two or three individual arms that cantilever up from the base portion of the box. To remove the disk in these prior art boxes, one typically presses down on a button at the crest of the two or three individual arms thereby releasing the disk.
There are several disadvantages to the prior art that are overcome by the present invention. Specifically, in the prior art, when the arms are pressed down to release the disk, the gaps between the individual arms often pinch the skin of the user. This can be painful for the user, and perhaps more importantly, the insertion of the skin into the gap prevents the arm from pressing inward to release the disk. Furthermore, when the arms are pushed inward by the user, it is often not possible to exert equal pressure on all of the arms. As such, this often causes the disk to be released by one engaging arm, but remains secured by the other arms. Thus, because of this synchronization problem the disk continues to be retained.
The present invention overcomes this disadvantage by presenting an engaging and releasing system that is of unitary one-piece construction similar to a bridge-like span that is horizontally parallel to the base. Since the release button and the two engage and release arms of the present invention are a unitary piece, a single push on the release button exerts equal pressure to the release and engage arms thereby avoiding the synchronization problem of the prior art.
In addition, since the prior art depends on several individual arms that project upward from the base terminating in open ends, there is a tendency for the plastic to deform over time. In other words, when a disk is stored over a long period of time, the plastic retaining arms have a tendency not to return to their original positions when the disk is ejected. The present invention overcomes this disadvantage. As a result of the engage and release mechanism's unitary construction and its inherent resiliency, there is no tendency for the plastic to deform as a result of stress. Furthermore, in the present invention, when the disk is stored in the box, the spring mechanism is not engaged or tensed. Instead, the disk resides solely on the protective ridge of the disk support member and on the support flanges of box's outer ring.
In the prior art jewel box systems, each time the disk retaining arms are depressed to release the disk, stress is placed on the disk itself, thereby bending it and potentially damaging it. This is due to the downward pressure that place on the disk itself transmitted to the disk through the retaining arms. Here, in the present invention, there is no stress or bending of the disk. Again, this is due to the fact that the sole motion when the disk is ejected occurs to the engaging and releasing mechanism while the disk itself remains stationary on the protective ridge and the outer ring.
In the prior art of jewel boxes, it is common for external pressure to be applied to the engage and release mechanism during transportation or storage though the pressure put on exterior portions of the box. This may potentially cause the disk to be released accidentally from engagement, thereby allowing the disk to be loose in the box and out of its proper position. Here, because in the present invention the disk rests on a stationary protective portion comprising the protective ridge and outer ring, external pressure on the box will not free the disk.
Since the optical disk contains information in the form of millions of indentations etched onto the surface of the disk, it is important that the disk be stored in a stress free environment. It is evident that if there is stress placed on the optically readable portions of the disk, there is a potential for damage to occur to the disk thereby corrupting the information. Typically, in the prior art, there is stress placed directly onto the disk. For example, in several of the prior art patents cited above, their ejector pins always exert stress on the disk in an attempt to push it upward.
In the prior art, horizontal (side to side) motion of the disk is regulated by the central retaining structure that is not fixed in height. That is to say, the disk rests on the outer ring portion and the central retaining structure. However, since the central retaining structure may vary in height due to compression, the central retaining structure may not lie on the same horizontal plane as the outer ring. Here, in the present invention, the disk rests on members that are fixed in position. Thus, the vertical members that fit through the central hole of the disk can be fixed in position and the space between them can be reliably fixed at a distance that is just smaller than the diameter of the central hole of the disk. As such, horizontal movement of the disk is regulated in a manner that stores the disk free of stress.
The same can be said of minimizing the motion of the disk in a vertical direction while minimizing the stress placed on the disk. In the present invention, the vertical motion of the disk is regulated by non-compressed members. As such, the vertical motion of the disk can be regulated within a small range while minimizing stress placed on the disk.
Furthermore, in the present invention, the contact between the disk and the jewel box takes place only on portions of the disk that are data free. As such, the potential for scratching of the disk and corruption of its data is reduced.
In prior art jewel boxes, the outer disk rings typically contain a plurality of (usually four) finger depressions so that the disk can be manually removed from the jewel box (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,944,181). This presents a disadvantage, as this type of jewel box cannot be used with automatic packaging machines. This is the case, because when an automatic packaging machine is utilized, there is a need to control the position of the mechanism. An improvement in the prior art is exemplified in U.S. Pat. No. 5,778,068 wherein the four depressions are edged to allow the use of automatic packaging machines. This now presents the disadvantage of being awkward for manual removal of the disk. The present invention DVD box overcomes these objections. The outer disk retaining ring of the present invention is of variable diameter. In some areas, it is slightly larger in diameter than the disk. In other areas, it is slightly smaller than the diameter of the disk. As such, the present invention is optimized for use with automatic packaging machines, while still allowing for convenient manual remova
Mou Lee Ching
Tim Lee Choy
Cheong Wing Electric, Ltd.
Kirshner Daniel
Luong Shian
LandOfFree
Digital video disk holder does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Digital video disk holder, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Digital video disk holder will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2916930