Surgery: splint – brace – or bandage – Bandage structure – Skin laceration or wound cover
Reexamination Certificate
1997-03-17
2001-10-23
Lewis, Kim M. (Department: 3761)
Surgery: splint, brace, or bandage
Bandage structure
Skin laceration or wound cover
C602S044000, C602S061000, C602S079000, C002S021000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06307118
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(a) Field of the Invention
This invention relates to wound dressings and wound bandages and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a disposable, washable, reusable digit wound dressing that can be used both as a secondary wound dressing for holding various types of dressings on digits of humans, animals and similar applications.
(b) Discussion of Prior Art
Because of the complexity of wound healing, the function of a wound dressing may be integral to the success of that process. Wound dressings function as:
a. a protective barrier from outside sources of irritation.
b. provide for mechanical support to the fragile wound surface.
c. serve to form an occlusive barrier to provide an optimal environment for certain wound types.
d. function to absorb wound byproducts that tend to accumulate and complicate healing.
e. act as an agent for wound debridement which acts to clean and prepare a wound bed for healing.
f. may have value as an acceptable camouflage for unsightly wound appearances.
Digit wound dressing are quite often secured in place by the application of an adhesive to the skin. This seemingly simple and universal method of dressing fixation actually has limited applicability accompanied with a significant list of inadequacies, problems and patient dissatisfactions:
a. difficulty with conforming to some anatomic locations and contours, particularly in active body locations.
b. an increasing incidence of adhesive allergies resulting in blister formation, rashes, weeping wounds, scars, and permanent pigmentation problems.
c. inability to adhere in areas of raw, open wounds, or wounds with vulnerable scab formation.
d. lack of satisfactory adherence in hair bearing areas or areas of hypersensitivity.
e. pain associated with adhesive removal in hair bearing areas or areas of hypersensitivity.
f. adhesive system is not reusable when loosened by movement or moisture, thus necessitating reapplication.
g. lack of usefulness in wet to dry dressing situations. Due to the moist dressing, adhesives will not hold the dressings in place, making the wet to dry concept totally ineffective.
h. possibly the most important of issues is that a wound dressing, if not properly chosen, can significantly retard and limit wound healing.
i. adhesives used will stick to protective gloves now used by all handlers of wound products, often tearing the gloves and making them ineffective as a protective barrier.
Also, traditional digit wound dressings are applied with various tapes, elastic wraps, gauze wraps, roller gauze and tube gauze. These dressing wraps have intrinsic negative aspects as compared to the subject digit wound dressing described by virtue of:
a. restricted areas of usefulness in terms of adhesives. Adhesives also cannot easily be “readjusted”.
b. wraps produce significant bulk of material and that bulk also reduces the gas exchanged from the wound surface.
c. wraps obscure the nature and quantity of wound drainage.
d. wraps such as tube gauze using a cage applicator require a second person to apply. This may lead to other individuals having to assist and/or provide additional care for the patient. The applying and removing the tube gauze from a digit can be extremely painful.
e. wraps often require a secondary means of fixation which thereby complicates the dressing change process.
f. wraps lead to waste of materials or increased production of biohazardous materials.
g. prior art elastic wraps may cause decreased blood flow to the digits.
Heretofore there have been a variety of different types of wound dressings using adhesives and stretchable wraps such as described in the following patents.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,732,146 to Fasline et al. discloses a surgical wound dressing device having a frame with an opening for receiving different types of wound dressings. A dressing is held in place by straps attached to one side of the frame with one end of the straps including releasable Velcro fasteners.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,917,112 to Kalt describes a bandage having an opening with the opening covered with a transparent membrane. The membrane is designed to allow air and vapors to permeate outward from the wound and prevent contaminants from entering in the opposite direction.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,909,243 to Frank et al., a two piece wound dressing is shown having an adhesive layer on one side of a baseplate with an opening in the baseplate to expose the wound and the epithelium area around the wound. A second adhesive layer on one side of a wound pad secures a wound dressing above the opening in the baseplate.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,907,579 to Kum, U.S. Pat. No. 5,167,613 to Karami et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,779,242 to McCullough disclosed different types of adhesive bandages for providing open areas to wounds to enhance healing. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,036,838 to Sherman, a foam plastic orthopedic fabric is described having a Velcro tab at one end of the fabric.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,470,410 to Elliott a stretchable sleeve is shown with Velcro fasteners at the ends of the sleeve. The sleeve includes a central opening with a releasable flap for retaining an intravenous tube or the like.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,709,695 to Kohn et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,399,816 to Spangler, U.S. Pat. No. 5,086,763 to Hathman, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,926,883 to Strock all describe different types of wound surrounding dressings and bandages. Also U.S. Pat. No. 4,190,054 to Brennan and U.S. Pat. No. 4,658,811 to Beaird disclose stretchable bandages having loop and hook type attachment ends for encircling the head of a patient.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,660 to the subject inventor and Dr. Barry F. Shesol, a wound dressing support device is described for holding a variety of standard gauze pads in place on top of an open wound. The device includes an elongated bidirectional wrap with a window opening therethrough. Around the sides of the window is a non-adhesive fastener for releasably engaging a portion of the sides of the gauze pad.
None of these prior art patents disclose the unique structure and advantages of the subject invention as described herein when addressing the need of a disposable wound wrap for digits.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to provide a digit wound dressing holder which acts as a secondary wound dressing and is easy to apply and holds different types of primary wound dressing such as a sterile gauze pad in place on top of a wound. Also in certain application, the digit wound dressing can be used as a primary wound dressing without using a sterile gauze pad or similar dressing. Further, the digit wound dressing can be used as a splint holder when a digit is broken. Still further, the wound dressing can be used as a wrap around a male penis after circumcision and for other penile injuries. The digit wound dressing uses a bidirectional wrap material which prevents slippage from the digit and provides for infinite adjustments when securing the wound wrap around the digit.
Another object of the invention is to provide a digit wound dressing that eliminates the need of using a standard tube gauze system which causes pain when applying the system and during it's removal. Using the subject invention, the patient can easily change the digit wound wrap and primary wound dressing with ease and without the need of assistance.
Yet another object of the invention is the dressing is provided with hook fasteners at one end of a wrap for engaging a portion of loop like material of the wrap allowing for easy adjustment in either loosing or tightening the wrap when a gauze pad is received over the wound. The unit is designed so that there is no excess material or use of supplies, thus keeping down the amount of bihazardous waste material to be disposed.
A further object of the dressing is that it's lightweight, nonconstricting, reusable, washable, non-adhesive, disposable, versatile and able to be applied by a single individual. The dressing allows for frequent dressing changes with minimal disruption to the wound bed or local tissues. Also, t
Crabtree Edwin H.
Lewis Kim M.
Margolis Donald W.
Pizzaro Ramon L.
LandOfFree
Digit wound dressing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Digit wound dressing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Digit wound dressing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2582272