Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss

Details Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss

2000-07-13

2002-09-10

Henry, Jon (Department: 2872)

Optical: systems and elements

Diffraction

From grating

C359S572000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06449096

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This application relates generally to a method and apparatus for diffracting light, and more specifically to a diffraction grating useful in various applications, such as optical telecommunications, that require high diffraction efficiency in multiple polarization orientations.
The Internet and data communications are causing an explosion in the global demand for bandwidth. Fiber optic telecommunications systems are currently deploying a relatively new technology called dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) to expand the capacity of new and existing optical fiber systems to help satisfy this demand. In DWDM, multiple wavelengths of light simultaneously transport information through a single optical fiber. Each wavelength operates as an individual channel carrying a stream of data. The carrying capacity of a fiber is multiplied by the number of DWDM channels used. Today, DWDM systems using up to 80 channels are available from multiple manufacturers, with more promised in the future.
Optical wavelength routing functions often use demultiplexing of a light stream into its many individual wavelengths, which are then optically directed along different paths. Subsequently, different wavelength signals may then be multiplexed into a common pathway. Within such routing devices, the optical signals are routed between the common and individual optical pathways by a combination of dispersion and focusing mechanisms. The focusing mechanism forms discrete images of the common pathway in each wavelength of the different optical signals and the dispersion mechanism relatively displaces the images along a focal line by amounts that vary with the signal wavelength.
Both phased arrays and reflective diffraction gratings may be used to perform the dispersing functions. While phased arrays are adequate when the number of channels carrying different wavelength signals is small, reflective diffraction gratings are generally preferable when large numbers of channels are used. However, reflective diffraction gratings tend to exhibit greater polarization sensitivity and since the polarization of optical signals often fluctuates in optical communication systems, this sensitivity may result in large variations in transmission efficiency. Loss of information is possible unless compensating amplification of the signals is used to maintain adequate signal-to-noise ratios. Although polarization sensitivity may generally be mitigated by increasing the grating pitch of the reflective grating, limitations on the desired wavelength dispersion for signals at optical telecommunication wavelengths preclude an increase in grating pitch sufficient to achieve high diffraction efficiency in all polarization directions.
It is thus desirable to provide a diffraction grating that can achieve high diffraction efficiency without significant polarization sensitivity when used at optical telecommunication wavelengths.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the present invention provide such a diffraction grating, achieving high diffraction efficiency in all polarization states when used for diffraction of an optical signal at telecommunications wavelengths. The diffraction grating in such embodiments includes a plurality of spaced triangular protrusions on a substrate in which reflective faces are blazed at angles that are substantially different from the Littrow condition.
Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, the diffraction grating is configured to diffract an optical signal of wavelength &lgr;. It has a substrate and a plurality of reflective faces oriented at respective blaze angles &thgr;
b
spaced along the substrate surface at a grating density 1/d. The blaze angles &thgr;
b
substantially differ from the Littrow condition sin &thgr;
b
=&lgr;/2d. Each of these reflective faces is supported by a support wall that is connected with the substrate surface such that the optical signal is reflected essentially only off the reflective faces and not off the support walls. Since the optical signal is reflected off the reflective faces but not the support walls, the diffraction efficiency of certain polarization states is improved.
In particular embodiments, the support walls are connected substantially normal with the surface of the substrate and in other embodiments they are connected at an obtuse angle with the substrate. The blaze angles are preferably within the range 50°≦&thgr;
b
≦70° and more preferably within the range 50°≦&thgr;
b
≦60°. The density at which the reflective faces are spaced along the substrate is preferably between 700 and 1100 faces/mm and more preferably between 800 and 1000 faces/mm.
In a certain embodiment, the reflective faces are equally spaced along the surface of the substrate at density 1/d between 800 and 1000 faces/mm without exposing the surface of the substrate, with each of the blaze angles &thgr;
b
substantially equal to 54.0°. In another embodiment, the reflective faces are equally spaced along the surface of the substrate at density 1/d between 800 and 1000 faces/mm such that a portion of the surface of the substrate is exposed between each such reflective face, with each of the blaze angles &thgr;
b
substantially equal to 55.8°. In that embodiment, the support walls preferably have an altitude between 1200 and 1400 nm, more preferably substantially equal to 1310 nm.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4095121 (1978-06-01), Begley et al.
patent: 4330175 (1982-05-01), Fujii et al.
patent: 4736360 (1988-04-01), McMahon
patent: 5279924 (1994-01-01), Sakai et al.
patent: 5414540 (1995-05-01), Patel et al.
patent: 5917625 (1999-06-01), Ogusu et al.
patent: 6097859 (2000-08-01), Solgaard et al.
patent: 2000-89011 (2000-03-01), None
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/442,061, Weverka et al, filed Nov. 16, 1999.
“Low Voltage Piezoelectric Stacks,” Transducer Elements, Catalog #3 1998, pp. 30-45, Piezo Systems, Inc. Cambridge, MA 02139.
Nishi, I. et al., “Broad-passband-width optical filter for multi/demultiplexer using a diffraction grating and a retroreflector prism,”Electronic Letters, vol. 21 (10), pp. 434-424 (May 9, 1985).
Sun, Z.J. et al, “Demultiplexer with 120 channels and 0.29-nm channel spacing,”IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 10(1), pp. 90-92 (Jan. 1998).
Philippe, P. et al, “Wavelength demultiplexer: using echelette gratings on silicon substrate,”Applied Optics, vol. 24(7), pp. 1006-1011 (Apr. 1, 1985).
Graf, U.U. et al, “Fabrication and evalution of an etched infrared diffraction grating,”Applied Optics, vol. 33(1), pp. 96-102 (Jan. 1, 1994).
Keller, L.D. et al, “Fabrication and testing of chemically micromachined silicon echelle gratings,”Applied Optics, vol. 39(7), pp. 1094-1105 (Mar. 1, 2000).
Smith, M.S. et al, “Diffraction gratings utilizing total internal reflection facets in littrow configuration,”IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11(1), pp. 84-86 (Jan. 1999).

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Diffraction grating with reduced polarization-dependent loss will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2914141