Diebond strip

Metal fusion bonding – With means to handle work or product – Including means to orient work or position work portion...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C228S009000, C228S049500, C428S573000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06752308

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved diebond strip. More specifically, the present invention relates to a Titanium alloy diebond strip which can be used to both attach and remove a laser die from a substrate.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A known diebond strip is shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2
. The strip
5
is typically an elongated rectangular shaped thin piece of graphite with a centrally located hole
20
and two further holes
22
,
24
located at opposite edges of the strip. The diebond strip is typically 1 mm thick approximately 15 mm wide and 54 mm long. Typically a component to be attached to a substrate is placed over central hole
20
and held in place with vacuum pressure. The component is placed on the substrate using various known designs of ceramic tooling attached around the strip. The strip is heated by connecting a low voltage, high current supply to holes
22
and
24
. These holes also function as a means of retaining the strip in place during the diebond process.
Currently, semiconductor laser die are mounted to a substrate by heating up an assembly in order to re-flow a preform of solder and allow the semiconductor laser die to be attached to the substrate. This process generates heat by passing a low voltage, high current supply along the die bond strip. With reference to
FIG. 3
, the semiconductor laser die
1
, also know as a chip, in attached to a submount
2
. The entire assembly
10
is heated via graphite strip
5
to a point where the solder preform
4
between the submount and the substrate reflows and attaches the chip-on-submount
2
to the substrate
3
. However, a technical problem exits with this know process in that the temperature must not be sufficient to compromise the joint between the chip and its submount. Thus, accurate and consistent temperature control is required.
Current methods of attaching the chip-on-submount to the substrate do not use any active control on the graphite diebond strip. Instead, the system uses thermocouples
31
,
32
as seen in
FIG. 4
, and periodically checks to ensure the temperature remains within set parameters.
Another technical problem associated with the current system is maintaining the contact between the thermocouple and the diebond strip, as the thermocouple cannot be attached reliably to the diebond strip. The position and contact of the thermocouple are maintained by using springs
33
,
34
. As a result, the control is based on the perceived temperature at the junction of the strip and thermocouple. Any variation in this junction can result in a variation of as much as 50° C., without any apparent change in the system.
Furthermore, the current system incorporates a parallel thermocouple system. Thus, if both thermocouples showed similar results, the system is considered to be “in balance” and ready for use. Any imbalance between the two thermocouples required the system to be re-balanced.
Yet another technical problem associated with the current diebond strip is that, due to the nature of graphite, it is difficult to press a thermocouple against the strip without the strip being flexed in some way. This reduces the effectiveness of the vacuum for the retention of the substrate on the strip, and compromises the transfer of heat energy from the strip to the substrate. Pressing the thermocouple against the strip also reduces efficiency of the thermocouple.
In addition, from the first time that the graphite strip is used, the strip begins to deteriorate. This is partially due to the processing of parts on the strip and causes an increase in the resistance of the strip. As the strip's effectiveness is reduced, and the process time gradually increases. This can be slightly compensated for by increasing the power to the strip. However, the current diebond strip must still be replaced approximately every 3 months.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to overcome or at least mitigate the above mentioned technical problems.
According to the present invention there is provided a strip for use in diebonding a component to a substrate, the strip comprising a central region having a reduced cross section compared to extremities of the strip.
The strip may have a stepped cross section. Alternatively, the strip may have a tapered cross section.
The strip is preferably made of an alloy, such as Titanium alloy.
According to the present invention, there is also provided a method for bonding a component to a substrate using a strip comprising a central region having a reduced cross section compared to the extremities of the strip, the method comprising the steps of disposing the substrate proximate the central region of the strip, disposing the component on the substrate, heating the strip to a predetermined temperature sufficient to cause solder disposed between the component and the substrate to reflow, and cooling the strip thereby causing said solder to bond the component to the substrate.
According to the present invention, there is also provided a method for removing a component bond to a substrate using a strip comprising a central region having a reduced cross section compared to the extremities of the strip, the method comprising the steps of disposing the substrate having the component bonded thereto proximate the central region of the strip, heating the strip to a predetermined temperature sufficient to cause solder disposed between the component and the substrate to reflow and break the bond, and removing the component from the substrate.
While the principle advantages and features of the invention have been described above, a greater understanding and appreciation of the invention may be obtained by referring to the drawings and detailed description of a preferred embodiments, presented by way of example only, in which;


REFERENCES:
patent: 4701781 (1987-10-01), Sankhagowit
patent: 4921154 (1990-05-01), Abe et al.
patent: 5070718 (1991-12-01), Thomas
patent: 5227572 (1993-07-01), Cusack et al.
patent: 5342999 (1994-08-01), Frei et al.
patent: 5454905 (1995-10-01), Fogelson
patent: 5896036 (1999-04-01), Wood et al.
patent: 2002/0025606 (2002-02-01), Kurihara et al.
patent: 2003/0010810 (2003-01-01), Mistry et al.
patent: 2003/0047760 (2003-03-01), Daeche et al.
patent: 2003/0064506 (2003-04-01), Vischer
patent: 2 149 278 (1985-06-01), None
patent: 590087825 (1982-11-01), None
patent: 60169144 (1984-02-01), None
patent: 63240088 (1987-03-01), None
patent: 03066481 (1991-02-01), None
patent: 02003051512 (2003-02-01), None

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Diebond strip does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Diebond strip, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Diebond strip will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3327234

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.