Dialog call-flow optimization

Data processing: speech signal processing – linguistics – language – Speech signal processing – Application

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C704S231000, C704S258000, C704S275000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07908143

ABSTRACT:
The present invention is concerned with reorganizing dialog call-flow in the presence of resource constraints. A call-flow has a set of dialogs. The set of grammars in a given call-flow set of dialogs is determined. Each grammar has an associated resource requirement. The resource constraint of the device is also determined. The dialogs are reorganized subject to the device resource constraints not being exceeded by a resultant resource requirement of merged dialogs. The grammars can be split into atomic dialogs before the reorganization is performed. The reorganization includes merging at least two of the dialogs.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4682365 (1987-07-01), Orita et al.
patent: 5724406 (1998-03-01), Juster
patent: 6016336 (2000-01-01), Hanson
patent: 6119087 (2000-09-01), Kuhn et al.
patent: 6314084 (2001-11-01), Kahale et al.
patent: 6510411 (2003-01-01), Norton et al.
patent: 6597705 (2003-07-01), Rezaiifar et al.
patent: 6618590 (2003-09-01), Howe
patent: 6721697 (2004-04-01), Duan et al.
patent: 6823054 (2004-11-01), Suhm et al.
patent: 7130391 (2006-10-01), Janakiraman et al.
patent: 2002/0075803 (2002-06-01), Zaharychuk et al.
patent: 2002/0123891 (2002-09-01), Epstein
patent: 2002/0193981 (2002-12-01), Keung et al.
patent: 2003/0046088 (2003-03-01), Yuschik
patent: 2003/0104813 (2003-06-01), Julka et al.
patent: 2003/0148779 (2003-08-01), Aravamudan et al.
patent: 2003/0157889 (2003-08-01), Yamada
patent: 2003/0233230 (2003-12-01), Ammicht et al.
patent: 2004/0136517 (2004-07-01), Bjornberg et al.
patent: 2005/0041788 (2005-02-01), Jan et al.
patent: WO 02/32090 (2002-04-01), None
Sinnig, D., “Patterns in Model-Based Development,” 2003. Position Paper in INTERACT 2003, http://wwwswt.informatik.uni-rostock.de/deutsch/Interact/07SinnigForbrigSeffah.pdf.
Jameson, A., “Adapting to the user's time and working memory limitations: New directions of research,”ABIS-98, FORWISS, Oct. 1988, Erlangen, Germany.
Minker, W., Haiber, U., Heisterkamp; P., Scheible, S., “Intelligent Dialog Overcomes Speech Technology Limitations: The SENECa Example,”International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Miami, Florida, Jan. 12-15, 2003, pp. 267-269.
Tiwari, V., Malik, S., and Wolfe, A.,“Power Analysis of Embedded Software: A First Step Towards Software Power Minimization,”IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 1994.
Ong, P. W., Ynn, R. H., “Power-Conscious Software Design—a framework for modeling software on hardware,”IEEE Proc. of Symposium on Low Power Electronics, pp. 36-37, 1994.
Barr, K. and Asanovic, K., “Energy Aware Lossless Data Compression,”Proceedings of MobiSys 2003: The First International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 5-8, 2003.
Donovan, R. E., and Eide, E. M., “The IBM Trainable Speech Synthesis System”, Int'l. Conf. On Spoken Lang. Processing, Sydney, 1998.
Levin, E., Pieraccini, R. and Eckert, W., “A Stochastic Model of Human-Machine Interaction for Learning Dialog Strategies”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 1, Jan. 2000.
Padmanabhan, M., Saon, G., Zweig, G., Huang, J., Kingsbury, B. and Mangu, L., “Evolution of the performance of automatic speech recognition algorithms in transcribing conversational telephone speech” Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 2001. IMTC 2001. Proceedings of the 18thIEEE, vol. 3, May 21-23, 2001, pp. 1926-1931.
Peskin, B., Gillick, L., Liberman, N., Newman, M., van Mulbregt, P., and Wegmann, S., “Progress in recognizing conversational telephone speech”, ICASSP-97, Apr. 21-24, 1997, pp. 1811-1814.
Ramaswamy, G.N. and Gopalakrishnan, P.S., “Compression of acoustic features for speech recognition in network environments”, ICASSP98, vol. 2, pp. 977-980.
McTear, M.F., “Spoken Dialog Technology: Enabling the Conversational User Interface”, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, No. 1, Mar. 2002, pp. 90-169.
Jacob, R.J.K., Deligiannidis, L., Morrison, S., “A Software Model and Specification Language for Non-WIMP User Interfaces”, 1999, ACM Digital Library.
Sensory Inc., “Product Brief—Fluent Speech Recognizer”, (http://www.sensoryinc.com/html/support/docs/80-0216-A.pdf), Mar. 16, 2001.
Middelhoek, P.F.A., Rajan, S.P., “From VHDL to Efficient First-time-right Designs: a formal approach”,ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems, vol. 1, 1996, pp. 205-220.
Kakita, K., “Inter-Speaker Interaction of F0 in Dialogs”,Proceedings of International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1996.
Kemp, T., “Data-Driven Codebook Adaption in Phonetically Tied SCHMMS”,Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Signal and Speech Processing, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 477-479.
Mori, H., and Sakamura, K., Complexity Optimization Technique for Sound Synthesis on Digital Sound Processing Architectures, Proceedings of the Tenth TRON Project Symposium (Dec. 1993), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 113-125.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dialog call-flow optimization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Dialog call-flow optimization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dialog call-flow optimization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2733921

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.