Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Detecting nuclear – electromagnetic – or ultrasonic radiation
Reexamination Certificate
2001-04-02
2004-08-10
Lateef, Marvin M. (Department: 3737)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Detecting nuclear, electromagnetic, or ultrasonic radiation
Reexamination Certificate
active
06773401
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Medical ultrasound imaging and therapeutic systems are rapidly becoming increasingly complex both in terms of their hardware and software. While the resulting increased diagnostic capability and value of such systems are extremely attractive to end-users, system manufacturers must assure that the increased complexity does not result in excessive cost, size, weight, or power requirements. Minimizing these physical characteristics while providing ever increasing capabilities and value has increased the manufacturers' needs for the latest in integrated circuit logic and memory devices, as well as for the latest in data-storage devices and compact efficient power supplies. In addition, these same requirements are also increasing the need for the latest in discrete electro-mechanical devices such as discrete switches and relays. Some ultrasound systems contain literally hundreds of such components, particularly in the case of newer systems having as many as 512 channels. Unfortunately, the improvement-rate for these latter discrete electro-mechanical components in terms of their integration, size, cost, efficiency, or reliability has not been as large as the improvement rate for the former above-mentioned components.
In addition, there are numerous performance reasons why today's discrete electro-mechanical devices are becoming unsatisfactory in ultrasound equipment design. Some of these reasons include high on-impedance, low off-impedance, stray capacitance, high insertion losses, high power consumption and poor power-switching capacity.
While electrical switching can be accomplished using electronic devices such as field effect transistors and thyristors, electro-mechanical contactors are preferable in certain applications. One disadvantage of electronic switches results from leakage currents that cause finite current flow in the “OFF” position. On the other hand, electro-mechanical switches have a visible open position; no current flows in the “OFF” position. The isolation in mechanical relays is determined by the contact gap, and this distance can be adjusted to suit the isolation needs of a variety of applications.
Also, in the proximity of high current systems, electronic devices are considerably sensitive to capacitive coupling and electrostatic discharge. Electro-mechanical relays exhibit good electro-magnetic compatibility, generally being insensitive to such effects.
Furthermore, today's discrete electro-mechanical devices are also physically inadequate. Ultrasound transducers increasingly need greater multiplexing capability wherein one may have many more piezoelements in the transducer than wires in the transducer cable. The current difficulty associated with such multiplexing (switching of electrical signals from a greater number of piezoelements among a lesser number of connecting wires) is that today's discrete electro-mechanical devices cannot easily be integrated in large numbers on a single IC chip. Therefore, they consume a lot of space, cost, power and weight and are avoided in large numbers, especially when the need is in the transducer or transducer connector itself.
Finally, another disadvantage of electronic switches is in the area of safety. Protective relays should in any situation which occurs, be in a position to switch off and isolate the faulty circuit. Electronic components cannot fulfill this requirement because in case of electrical breakdown or thermal overload, they generally conduct current in both directions, and are no longer able to interrupt. Thus, mechanical relays, instead of semiconductor switches, must be used for functions meant for safety.
Accordingly, there is a need for an ultrasound system for medical imaging or therapy incorporating micro-mechanical devices which retains the benefits of discrete electro-mechanical devices and provides the additional benefits of reduced size, reduced cost, improved signal integrity, reduced power consumption and higher voltage pulsing capability.
SUMMARY
By way of introduction, the preferred embodiments described below relate to an ultrasound system having the advantages of reduced size, reduced cost, improved signal integrity, reduced power consumption and higher-voltage pulsing capability. More particularly, the presently preferred embodiments relate to an improved ultrasound system incorporating micro-mechanical devices to replace “macroscopic” electro-mechanical devices in existing ultrasound designs. The presently preferred embodiments also relate to an ultrasound system which incorporates micro-mechanical devices to provide new functionality where existing electro-mechanical devices were inadequate. Given the ever-increasing bandwidth requirements of ultrasound systems coupled with their need for reduced size and cost, the potential has been recognized for micro-mechanical components to solve size, cost and power problems and allow for superior power-handling and gain the resulting superior system performance.
The preferred embodiments described below apply the new technology of micro-mechanical devices to solve the lag in the rate of improvement of electro-mechanical devices. With these preferred embodiments, for example, one may miniaturize entire switching circuit boards in existing ultrasound systems and transducers by instead employing IC-sized micro-arrays of relays and switches. This can result in drastic size, cost and power reductions as well as in several system and transducer performance-enhancements to be described herein.
It is expected that ultrasound systems and transducers, whether of handheld miniaturized portable-design or of more conventional semi-portable console-design, will benefit significantly.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4262399 (1981-04-01), Cady
patent: 4432007 (1984-02-01), Cady
patent: 5415175 (1995-05-01), Hanafy et al.
patent: 5438998 (1995-08-01), Hanafy
patent: 5479042 (1995-12-01), James et al.
patent: 5582177 (1996-12-01), Hanafy et al.
patent: 5619476 (1997-04-01), Haller et al.
patent: 5651365 (1997-07-01), Hanafy et al.
patent: 5701901 (1997-12-01), Lum
patent: 5724976 (1998-03-01), Mine et al.
patent: 5743855 (1998-04-01), Hanafy et al.
patent: 5744898 (1998-04-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5760530 (1998-06-01), Kolesar
patent: 5792058 (1998-08-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5870351 (1999-02-01), Ladabaum et al.
patent: 5876345 (1999-03-01), Eaton et al.
patent: 5894452 (1999-04-01), Ladabaum et al.
patent: 5982709 (1999-11-01), Ladabaum et al.
patent: 6004832 (1999-12-01), Haller et al.
patent: 6251074 (2001-06-01), Averkiou
patent: 6328697 (2001-12-01), Fraser
U.S. Market Overview, by Roger Grace, Roger Grace Associates, Commercialization of MEMS, Kona, Hawaii, Oct. 7, 1996, J:\MEMS\Hawaii\cs1 © 1996 Roger Grace Associates, obtained at internet address http://www.rgraceassoc.com/com_mems.html, pp. 1-9, Dec. 31, 1998.
“Electrostatically actuated micromechanical switches using surface micromachining”, Prof. Paul M. Zavracky, Ph.D., obtained at internet address http://www.ece.neu.edu/edsnu/zavracky/mfl/programs/relay/relay.html, pp. 1-8, Dec. 31, 1998.
WWW Pages for Shuvo Roy, MEMS Research Group, obtained at internet address http://mems.cwru.edu/roy/roy.html/, http://mems.cwru.edu/roy/content_guide.html, http://mems.cwru.edu/roy/projects/microrelays.html, http://mems.cwru.edu/roy/publications.html, http://mems.cwru.edu/roy/pix/relayc.gif, Dec. 31, 1998.
Ezekiel J. J. Kruglick and Professor Kristofer S. J. Pister, Project Overview: Micro-Relays, obtained at internet address http://www-bsac.eecs.berkeley.edu/~kruglick/relays/relays.html, pp. 1-2, Dec. 31, 1998.
Technical Report Abstract on Microactuated Resettable Switch, TiNi Alloy Company, obtained at internet address http://quark.plk.af.mil/abstracts/97/TR971005.html, Dec. 31, 1998.
Low-Power, High-Performance MEMS-based Switch Fabric (From a presentation to DARPA) by Paul D. Franzon, North Carolina State University, obtained at internet address http://ece.ncsu.edu/erl/damemi/switchproj.html, Feb. 9, 1999.
MAFET Thrust 3: A Revolutionary Program for Solid-State RF Power Gener
Carp Stuart L.
Dreschel William R.
Kling Terry
Sliwa John W.
Acuson Corp.
Lateef Marvin M.
Patel Maulin
LandOfFree
Diagnostic medical ultrasound systems and transducers... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Diagnostic medical ultrasound systems and transducers..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Diagnostic medical ultrasound systems and transducers... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3317875