Device for monitoring a conveyor

Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C340S673000, C198S464400, C198S502100, C198S502400, C198S810020

Reexamination Certificate

active

06831566

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(1) Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a device for monitoring a conveyor installation comprising
a conveyor belt made of elastomeric material with a carrying side for the conveyed material and a backing side, whereby the conveyor belt comprises an embedded reinforcement in most cases; as well as
other components such as drive pulleys, return pulleys, reverse pulleys, conveyor pulleys, mounting structures, feed chutes, as well as other components as required.
The following two complexes of problems are connected with a device of the type specified above:
(A)
Conveyor belts are highly stressed as they are being impacted by the bulk material to be conveyed. Since it is not possible to assure that the transported pieces of material have a uniform especially in the field of mining, damage to the carrying side of the conveyor belt caused by particularly large pieces of material or pieces with sharp edges occurs frequently. Damage to the carrying side is critical because conveyed material as well as water may penetrate the damaged sites of the belt, which is connected with consequential damage including damage to the reinforcement (carcass) and the backing side. Such damaged spots will grow, which will finally lead to failure of the conveyor belt unless the damage is repaired in due time.
Furthermore, large transported pieces, for example of ore, debris and rock pose the risk that they will get jammed in the feed chutes. The friction connected with such jamming will then frequently lead to early, premature wear of the carrying side of the conveyor belt. Furthermore, this may cause fire due to friction heat and sparking, which poses a particularly serious hazard in underground mining operations.
(2) Description of Related Art
Now, a device for monitoring a flow of material of a conveyor installation is described in DE-A-42 40 094, whereby the conveyor system is controlled in such a way that any oblique running of the conveyor belt and the wear are minimized, with the conveyor operating at maximum capacity. The control system is comprised of a light source that projects a band of light onto the stream of material, whereby an additional camera detects the course which the top edge of the transported material is running, as well as the corresponding run of the conveyor belt. An image evaluation unit then analyzes the course followed by the top edge.
Said system is conceived in such a way that it requires great expenditure, and is, furthermore, extremely susceptible to trouble. Furthermore, when heterogeneous material comprising small, medium-sized and very large pieces of material is transported, the course taken by the top edge can be determined only inadequately. The analysis by means of the image evaluation unit is consequently afflicted with error sources.
Furthermore, the problem complex (B) cannot be detected with said system.
(B)
Foreign bodies of material may lead to penetration of the conveyor belt in isolated cases. Such foreign bodies may be components of the feed chutes, support rollers and other components of the conveyor system. Furthermore, tools, tapping residues in foundries and sharp-edged materials contained in the transported material are hazard sources as well.
If a foreign body impacts the conveyor belt in an unfavorable way, this may cause such a foreign body to get jammed in some part of the conveyor system. The conveyor belt is pierced and continues to run with almost no obstruction because the force driving the conveyor belt is substantially higher than the resistance of the conveyor belt versus the jammed foreign body. Such a situation results in a longitudinal slitting of the conveyor belt. A repair of the conveyor belt is then no longer possible in most cases, or would be uneconomical. The damage so caused is substantial.
Methods employed for avoiding such slitting damage predominantly comprise active systems such as transverse reinforcements integrated on the carrying side of the conveyor belt, or passive systems (e.g. conductor loops, DE-C-44 44 264), which are integrated in the conveyor belt by vulcanization at defined intervals, for example of 50 m. If a conductor loop suffers damage, an electro-inductive current circuit is broken, which leads to shutdown of the conveyor system via detectors.
Transverse reinforcements may considerably increase the resistance to slitting. However, the kind of damage described above may occur nonetheless.
Conductor loops are comprised of fine metal cords that react sensitively to external influences such a continuous impacts, as well as changes occurring in the longitudinal and transverse bending. Erroneous reports issue frequently. Their useful life is highly limited.
Furthermore, said method is not suited for detecting the problem complex (A) because a material blockade caused by an oversized piece of material must not necessarily lead to penetration.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Now, the object of the invention is to provide for the entire problem complex (A+B) a device for monitoring a conveyor system that detects a damage of the conveyor belt early; which is free of wear and low in maintenance, and which is economical and requires as little technical expenditure as possible.
This object is achieved in that the device is provided with an optoelectronic system located in an area where no material is transported. Said device monitors the carrying side of the belt and optically detects and reports any damage to the conveyor belt, if necessary in conjunction with an automatic shutdown of the conveyor installation.
The optoelectronic system is preferably installed in the vicinity of the drive pulley, the return pulley or the reverse pulley. In said areas, the usually sagging conveyor belt is free of transported material and, furthermore, aligned plane. Deepened spots or other changes of the carrying side are recognizable there particularly well.
In particularly in conjunction with conveyor systems operating over large distances, which may amount to several kilometers, the device usefully comprises the following additional components:
At least one detectable element that is integrated in the conveyor belt, in particular in the form of a plurality of elements that are arranged in the longitudinal and transverse directions with a spacing from each other; as well as
at least one scanning unit with the help of which the damage is localized without contact by detecting the element or elements.
Since the transported material is passing by the drive pulley, return pulley or reverse pulley only for a short time, the damage detected there by the optoelectronic system can be localized in this way within the sections farther downstream, in conjunction with repair measures implemented after the conveyor system has been shut down.
The detectable element is preferably completely embedded in the conveyor belt by vulcanization, specifically within the carrying side of the latter. The detectable element is in this connection in particular a transponder, a metal particle or a permanent magnet.
All physical principles by which the elements installed in the conveyor belt can be detected in terms of measuring technology are suited for the detection (identification) by means of the scanning unit, whereby the following has to be noted with respect to the elements specified above:
Transponders can be detected by means of special antennas with a suitable directional characteristic.
Metal particles can be detected by means of inductive methods such as, for example the eddy current method, radar waves or microwaves with ionizing radiation, or ultrasound.
Permanent magnets can be detected by means of all magnetosensitive methods such as, for example magnetoinductive methods, magnetoresistive sensors, or Hall-effect sensors.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3651506 (1972-03-01), Olaf et al.
patent: 3922661 (1975-11-01), Enabnit et al.
patent: 4087800 (1978-05-01), Lee
patent: 4437563 (1984-03-01), Oriol
patent: 6032787 (2000-03-01), Kellis
patent: 24 13 543 (1975-10-01), None
patent: 31 06 568 (1982-09-01), None
patent: 4

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Device for monitoring a conveyor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Device for monitoring a conveyor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device for monitoring a conveyor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3327182

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.