Device and method for testing phase-locked loops

Electricity: measuring and testing – Measuring – testing – or sensing electricity – per se – Frequency of cyclic current or voltage

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C324S076520, C331S044000, C331S00100A, C331S00100A, C327S157000, C714S811000, C714S799000, C375S376000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06642701

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a device for testing a phase-locked loop (PLL) and a method thereof.
2. Description of the Related Art
The PLL is indispensable in complex high-frequency synchronous systems because of the difficulty in the distribution of reliable low-skew high-frequency clock signal throughout the various package technologies of a complex system.
The benefits of utilizing PLL-based clock distribution for high-frequency synchronous systems is particularly clear in the design of a complex high-performance machine such as a server. A high-frequency synchronous system employs a variety of packaging technologies, including single-chip modules (SCMs), multichip modules (MCMs), cards, and boards. The distribution of a reliable low-skew high-frequency clock signal throughout these various package technologies is, to say the least, difficult. The PLL-based design facilitates distribution of a relatively low-frequency reference oscillator to each of the components. Each component contains a PLL, which then multiplies that frequency to a higher frequency that it requires while maintaining proper phase alignment for a synchronous design. The ability of the PLL to multiply the reference oscillator frequency is critical, Far since the synchronous system may have a number of components running at different frequencies (G. A. Van Huben, T. G. McNamara and T. E. Gilbert, “PLL modeling and verification in a cycle-simulation environment,” IBM Journal of Research & Development, Vol. 43, No. 5/6, 1999).
Another advantage of the PLL-based design concept is that it permits the use of programmable ratios among a collection of system components. Assume a subsystem is supposed to run at a specified number of times slower than another, say a processor. If the chips of the subsystem were actually to run faster or slower than the specified frequency, the multiplier bits of the subsystem PLL could be reprogrammed with a new “gear ratio.” As long as the on-chip clock logic is capable of supporting a different frequency, the system ratios can be reprogrammed without the risk of introducing frequency-sensitive anomalies into the rest of the system. It is critical to keep the clock skew between the various components of a synchronous system very low. The PLL for each component phase-aligns its on-chip clock distribution delay. PLLs are also used in frequency synthesizers, analog and digital modulators and demodulators.
A PLL is described as a system that uses feedback to maintain an output signal in a specific phase relationship with a reference signal in the following reference.
Steven L. Maddy, “Phase-Locked Loop,” Chapter 70 of
The Electrical Engineering Handbook,
editor-in-chief: Richard C. Dorf, IEEE Press, CRC Press, pp. 1567-1575, 1993.
FIG. 1
shows a configuration of such a PLL. As explained above, the frequency of the output signal of the PLL is a multiple of the frequency of its input signal.
Phase comparator
11
produces an output combination that is dependent on the phase difference of the two input signals CK and FB, where CK is the reference signal input. It is a state-machine triggered by the rising edges of the input signals CK and FB and produces the output signals UP and DN. The state diagram is as shown in FIG.
2
. As illustrated in
FIG. 2
, the state-machine has a discharge state
21
, a hold state
22
and a charge state
23
. Lock detector
16
produces a single observable output signal L that is dependent on the phase difference of the two input signals.
Charge pump
12
consists of two CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor) switches, as illustrated in
FIG. 3
, controlled by the states of the phase comparator
11
.
FIG. 4
shows how the charge pump
12
functions. When the signal UP is low (logic 0), the switch
31
connects the node of output signal V
out
to V
DD
, and when the signal DN is low, the switch
32
connects the node to V
SS
. When both signals UP and DN are high (logic 1), the node is isolated from V
DD
and V
SS
and voltage V
op
on a capacitor of loop filter (LPF)
13
appears as V
out
.
The loop filter
13
is a low-pass filter and is used to control the PLL dynamics and therefore the performance of the PLL. Voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO)
14
is a circuit that produces an AC (alternating current) output whose frequency F
vco
is proportional to the input control voltage. 1/N divider
17
is a device that produces output signal D
out
whose frequency is an integer (denoted by N) division of that of an input signal (output signal X of the PLL). When the frequency of the signal X is F
vco
, the frequency of the signal D
out
becomes F
vco
/N. The signal D
out
is input as the signal FB to the phase comparator
11
.
2-to-1 multiplexer (MUX)
15
makes it possible to by-pass the PLL with a clock signal at input A. S is the control input for the multiplexer
15
. The PLL can be by-passed by setting input S to 0 and clocking through input A. A zero-pulse (pulse width given in specification) on S resets the PLL to a hold state.
The above description of PLL functions suggests that PLL testing may be achieved by exercising the PLL under test (PUT) as follows.
Checking the “start” sequence: This is the verification that the PLL could be brought up to frequency within a specified time from the time the system is started. This includes the verification of phase locking.
Normal mode operation: After phase lock, checks must be done to ascertain that the output signal of the PLL is at the desired frequency.
Changing frequency dynamically: This is the verification of the fact that the PLL could operate in various modes, such as system test mode, normal operation mode, etc. This may involve the reprogramming of the PLL in order to effect frequency change dynamically.
Checking the “stop” sequence: This is the verification that all chips being driven would stop at the stop of the PLL. This, together with the “start” sequence check, verifies that the driven chips would cease and resume operation in tandem.
However, the PLL, like other high-frequency analog and mixed signal circuits, is difficult to test. Although most specification-based test schemes for the PLL perform the “start” sequence checks and normal mode operation verification, dynamic change of frequency and “stop” sequence checks are not facilitated for.
Dalmia et al. have presented an operating current-monitoring method of PLL testing (M. Dalmia, A. Ivanov and S. Tabatabaei, “Power Supply Current Monitoring Techniques for Testing PLLs,”
Proc. Sixth IEEE Asian Test Symposium,
pp. 366-371, November 1997). The approach used in this method is not ad-hoc, however, currently it is difficult to implement a test scheme based on operating current measurement. Kim et al. have presented a defect-oriented method that realizes testing by taking the PLL operation through two dynamic transitions (S. Kim, M. Soma and D. Risbud, “An Effective Defect-Oriented BIST Architecture for High-Speed Phase-Locked Loops, ”
Proc.
18th
IEEE VLSI Test Symposium,
April 2000). The method then measures the three stable frequencies for comparisons with the expected frequencies. However, their method does not perform the “start” sequence check and it requires the addition of a significant amount of extra hardware.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a device for modified PLL testing which includes verification of dynamic change of frequency and/or a “start” sequence check, and a method thereof.
The testing device according to the present invention comprises a reset circuit, an input circuit, an output circuit and a connection control circuit.
The reset circuit resets the phase-locked loop by disconnecting the charge pump from the loop filter and providing an alternative discharge path for the loop filter. The input circuit receives a feedback signal from an output of the phase-locked loop and a control signal, produces a combination signal from the received signals and inputs the combination signal to the phase-locked loop.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Device and method for testing phase-locked loops does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Device and method for testing phase-locked loops, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device and method for testing phase-locked loops will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3181309

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.