Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Biological or biochemical
Reexamination Certificate
2006-07-21
2011-12-06
Tsai, Carol (Department: 2857)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system in a specific environment
Biological or biochemical
C702S186000, C708S250000, C708S255000, C331S078000, C706S022000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08073631
ABSTRACT:
In the field of direct mind-machine interactions, prior art devices and methods do not provide sufficiently fast and reliable results. Mental influence detectors (100, 140, 400, 430) and corresponding methods provide fast and reliable results useful for detecting an influence of mind and hidden or classically non-inferable information. An anomalous effect detector (100) includes a source (104) of non-deterministic random numbers (110), a converter (114) to convert a property of numbers, a processor to accept converter output (118) and to produce an output signal (124) representative of an influence of mind. The processor output signal (124) contains fewer numbers than the input (110). A quantum computer (400) includes a physical source of entropy (404) to generate output numbers (405); a source (406) of test numbers (407); a measurement processor410) to accept output numbers (405) and to measure a relationship between process numbers and at least one test number to produce an output (414) representative of an influence of mind.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4075622 (1978-02-01), Lawrence et al.
patent: 4853884 (1989-08-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5239494 (1993-08-01), Golbeck
patent: 5830064 (1998-11-01), Bradish et al.
patent: 6061702 (2000-05-01), Hoffman
patent: 6324558 (2001-11-01), Wilber
patent: 6369727 (2002-04-01), Vincze
patent: 6374278 (2002-04-01), Korn et al.
patent: 6581078 (2003-06-01), Liardet
patent: 6862605 (2005-03-01), Wilber
patent: 6954770 (2005-10-01), Carlson et al.
patent: 7096242 (2006-08-01), Wilber
patent: 7216038 (2007-05-01), Vitaliano et al.
patent: 7587439 (2009-09-01), Onufryk et al.
patent: 2002/0035586 (2002-03-01), Szajnowski
patent: 2002/0169810 (2002-11-01), Wilber
patent: 2003/0037079 (2003-02-01), Wilber
patent: 2004/0076293 (2004-04-01), Smeets et al.
patent: 2004/0107229 (2004-06-01), Remi
patent: 2004/0205095 (2004-10-01), Gressel et al.
patent: 2006/0010182 (2006-01-01), Altepeter et al.
patent: 2007/0033242 (2007-02-01), Wilber
patent: 2007/0162809 (2007-07-01), de Jager et al.
patent: 2007/0282934 (2007-12-01), Luzzi et al.
patent: 2008/0183314 (2008-07-01), Klouzal et al.
Thouless, “The Repeated Guessing Technique”, International Journal of Parapsychology, 1960, pp. 21-36, vol. 2, No. 3.
Scott, “An Appendix to the Repeated Guesing Technique”, International Journal of Parapsychology, 1960, pp. 37-45, vol. 2, No. 3.
Taetzch, “A Design of a Psi Communications System”, International Journal of Parapsychology, 1962, pp. 35-66, vol. 4.
Jahn et al., “Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium: PortREG Replication Experiments”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2000, pp. 499-555, vol. 14, No. 4.
Ibison, “Evidence that Anomalous Statistical Influence Depends on the Details of the Random Process”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1998, pp. 407-423, vol. 12, No. 3.
Dobyns, “Overviw of Several Theoretical Models on PEAR Data”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2000, pp. 163-194, vol. 14, No. 2.
Radin, “Enhancing Effects in Psi Experiments with Sequential Analysis: A Replication and Extension”, European Journal of Parapsychology, 1990-91, vol. 8, pp. 98-111.
Puthoff et al., “Calculator-Assisted Psi-Amplification II”, in Research in Psychology, D. Weiner et al., eds., Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ, 1985, pp. 73-77.
Ryzl, “A Model of Parapsychological Communication”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1966, pp. 18-30, 30(1).
Kennedy, “Methods for Investigating Goal-Oriented PSI”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1995, pp. 47-62, vol. 59.
Carpenter, “Prediction of Forced-Choice ESP Performance”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1983, pp. 217-236, vol. 47.
Carpenter, “Prediction of Forced-Choice ESP Performance”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1991, pp. 227-280, vol. 55.
Brier et al., “PSI Application: Part I. A Preliminary Attempt”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1970, pp. 1-25, vol. 34, No. 1.
Brier et al., “PSI Application: Part II. The Majority Vote Technique—Analysis and Observations”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 1970, pp. 26-36, vol. 34, No. 1.
Khrennivov, “Classical and Quantum Mechanics on Information Spaces with Applications to Cognitive, . . . Phenomena”, Foundations of Physics, 1999, pp. 1065-1098, vol. 29, No. 7.
UTTS, “An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning”, 1995, 22 pages, University of California, Davis, Division of Statistics.
UTTS, “Replication and Meta-Analysis in Parapsychology”, Statistical Science, 1991, pp. 363-378, vol. 6, No. 4.
Storm, “A Paradigm Shift Away from the ESP-pk Dichotomy: The Theory of Psychopraxia”, The Journal of Parapsychology, 2000, pp. 279-297, vol. 64.
Atmanspacher et al., “Problems of Reproducibility in Complex Mind-Matter Systems”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2003, pp. 243-270, vol. 17.
Atmanspacher et al., “Deviations from Physical Randomness Due to Human Agent Intention?”, Chaos, Solitons, & Fractals, 1999, pp. 935-952, vol. 10.
Atmanspacher et al., “Investigating Deviations from Dynamical Randomness with Scaling Indices”, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2000, pp. 1-18, vol. 14, No. 1.
Radin et al., Evidence for Consciousness-Related Anomalies in Random Physical Systems, Foundations of Physics, 1989, pp. 1499-1514, vol. 19, Nol 12.
Radin, “Neural Network Analysis of Consciousness-Related Patterns in Random Sequences”, Society for Scientific Exploration,1993, pp. 355-373.
Jahn, “The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 1982, pp. 136-170, vol. 70, No. 2.
Radin, “Searching for ‘Signatures’ in Anomalous Human-Machine Interaction Data: A Neural Network Approach”, J. of Scientific Exploration, 1989, pp. 185-200, vol. 3, No. 2.
Radin, Dean I et al., Towards a High Technology of the Mind: Rationale, Prototype Design and Initial Experiments, Mar. 13, 1991, Contel Technology Center, Chantilly, VA.
Steele, J.M., Random Walk and First Step Analysis, in Stochastic Calculus and Financial Applications, Karatzas, I. and Yor, M., editors, 2001, pp, 1-9, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
Jensen Christopher B.
Wilber Patrick A.
Wilber Scott A.
Psigenics Corporation
Swenson Thomas
Tsai Carol
LandOfFree
Device and method for responding to influences of mind does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Device and method for responding to influences of mind, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device and method for responding to influences of mind will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4303515