Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage...

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Preparations characterized by special physical form – Implant or insert

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C424S422000, C424S424000, C424S425000, C424S426000, C424S484000, C424S572000, C514S002600, C530S350000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06514514

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a cartilage regeneration and repair product that induces cell ingrowth into a bioresorbable material and cell differentiation into cartilage tissue, and to methods of using such a product to repair cartilage lesions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Articular cartilage, an avascular tissue found at the ends of articulating bones, has limited natural capacity to heal. During normal cartilage ontogeny, mesenchymal stem cells condense to form areas of high density and proceed through a series of developmental stages that ends in the mature chondrocyte. The final hyaline cartilage tissue contains only chondrocytes that are surrounded by a matrix composed of type II collagen, sulfated proteoglycans, and additional proteins. The matrix is heterogenous in structure and consists of three morphologically distinct zones: superficial, intermediate, and deep. Zones differ among collagen and proteoglycan distribution, calcification, orientation of collagen fibrils, and the positioning and alignment of chondrocytes (Archer et al., 1996
, J. Anat.
189(1):23-35; Morrison et al., 1996
, J. Anat.
189(1): 9-22; and Mow et al.,1992
, Biomaterials
13(2): 67-97). These properties provide the unique mechanical and physical parameters to hyaline cartilage tissue.
The meniscus, a C-shaped cartilaginous tissue, performs several functions in the knee including load transmission from the femur to the tibia, stabilization in the anterior-posterior position during flexion, and joint lubrication. Damage to the meniscus results in reduced knee stability and knee locking. Over 20 years ago, meniscectomies were performed which permitted immediate pain relief, but were subsequently found to induce the early onset of osteoarthritis (Fairbank,
J. Bone Joint Surg.
30B: 664-670; Allen et al., 1984
, J. Bone Joint Surg.
66B:666-671; and Roos et al., 1998
, Arth. Rheum.
41:687-693). More recently, partial meniscectomies and repair of meniscal tears have been performed (FIGS. 9A-D; Jackson, D., ed., 1995, Reconstructive Knee Surgery Master Techniques in Orthopedic Surgery, ed. R. Thompson, Raven Press: New York). However, partial resection results in the loss of functional meniscus tissue and the early onset of osteoarthritis (Lynch et al., 1983
, Clin. Orthop.
172:148-153; Cox et al., 1975
, Clin. Orthop.
109:178-183; King, 1995
, J. Bone Joint Surg.
77B:836-837). Additionally, repair of meniscal tears is limited to tears in the vascular ⅓ of the meniscus; tears in the semivascular to avascular ⅔ are not repairable (FIGS. 9A-D; Jackson, ibid.). Of the approximately, 560,000 meniscal injuries that occur annually in the United States, an estimated 80% of tears are located in the avascular, irreparable zone. Clearly, a method that both repairs “non-repairable” tears or that can induce regeneration of resected menisci would be valuable for painless musculoskeletal movement and prevention of the early onset of osteoarthritis in a large segment of the population.
The proximal, concave surface of the meniscus contacts the femoral condyle and the distal, flat surface contacts the tibial plateaus. The outer one-third of the meniscus is highly vascularized and contains dense, enervated, connective tissue. In contrast, the remaining meniscus is semivascular or avascular, aneural tissue consisting of fibrochondrocytes surrounded by abundant extracellular matrix (McDevitt et al.,
Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.
252:8-17). Fibrochondrocytes are distinctive in both appearance and function compared to undifferentiated fibroblasts. Fibroblasts are elongated cells containing many cellular processes and produce predominantly type I collagen. The matrix produced by fibroblasts does not produce a sufficient mechanical load. In contrast, fibrochondrocytes are round, and are encompassed by lacunae that consists of type I and type II collagen and proteoglycans. These matrix components support compressive forces that are commonly exerted on the meniscus during musculoskeletal movement.
In the 1960's, demineralized bone matrix was observed to induce the formation of new cartilage and bone when implanted in ectopic sites (Urist, 1965
, Science
150:893-899). The components responsible for the osteoinductive activities were termed Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP). At least seven individual BMP proteins were subsequently identified from bone (BMP 1-7) and amino acid analysis revealed that six of the seven BMPs were related to each other and to other members of the TGF-&bgr; superfamily. During endochondral bone formation, TGF-&bgr; family members direct a cascade of events that includes chemotaxis, differentiation of pluripotential cells to the cartilage lineage, maturation of chondrocytes to the hypertrophic stage, mineralization of cartilage, replacement of cartilage with bone cells, and the formation of a calcified matrix (Reddi, 1997
, Cytokine
&
Growth Factor Reviews
8:11-20). Although individual, recombinant BMPs can induce these events, the prevalence of multiple TGF-&bgr; family members in bone tissue underlies the complexity involved in natural osteogenesis.
Bone Protein (Sulzer Orthopedics Biologics, Denver, Colo.), also referred to herein as BP, is a naturally derived mixture of proteins isolated from demineralized bovine bones that has osteogenic activity in vitro and in vivo. In the rodent ectopic model, BP induces endochondral bone formation or bone formation through a cartilage intermediate (Damien, C. et al., 1990
, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.
24:639-654). BP in combination with calcium carbonate promotes bone formation in the body (Poser and Benedict, PCT Publication No. WO95/13767). In vitro, BP has been shown to promote differentiation to cartilage of murine embryonic mesenchymal stem cells (Atkinson et al., 1996, In “Molecular and Developmental Biology of Cartilage”, Bethesda, Md.,
Annals New York Acad. Sci.
785:206-208; Atkinson et al., 1997
, J. Cell. Biochem.
65:325-339) and of adult myoblast and dermal cells (Atkinson et al., 1998, 44th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, abstract). To ensure chondrogenesis in these in vitro systems, however, culture conditions must be tightly controlled throughout the culture period, including by controlling cellular organization within the culture, optimizing media formulations, and adding exogenous factors that must be carefully established to maximize chondrogenesis over mitogenesis. Such optimization of conditions makes the application of the disclosed in vitro methods to an in vivo system unrealistic and unpredictable. In addition, although in vitro cultures of adult myoblast and dermal cells initially resulted in chondrogenesis, the effect was only transient and over time, the cultures reverted to their original phenotype. Although certain embryonic and precursor cell types showed prolonged chrondrogenesis in vitro in these studies, it would be unpredictable or even impossible in the case of embryonic cells that these specific cell types could be recruited to a site in vivo in an adult patient.
Atkinson et al., in PCT Application No. PCT/EP/05100, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, describe a delivery system for osteoinductive and/or chondroinductive mixture of naturally derived factors for the induction of cartilage repair.
Hunziker (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,368,858 and 5,206,023) describes a cartilage repair composition consisting of a biodegradable matrix, a proliferation and/or chemotactic agent, and a transforming factor. A two-stage approach is used where each component has a specific function over time. First, a specific concentration of proliferation/chemotactic agent fills the defect with repair cells. Second, a larger transforming factor concentration, preferably provided in conjunction with a delivery system, transforms repair cells to chondrocytes. The second stage delivery of a high concentration of transforming factor in a delivery system (i.e., liposomes) was required to obtain formation of hyaline cartilage tissue at the treatment site.
Chen and Jeffries (U.S. Pat. No. 5,7

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3171766

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.