Fluid sprinkling – spraying – and diffusing – With selectively preset flow cutoff or initiating means – By programming means
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-07
2002-08-27
Morris, Lesley D. (Department: 3752)
Fluid sprinkling, spraying, and diffusing
With selectively preset flow cutoff or initiating means
By programming means
C239S172000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06439473
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to pavement marking. More particularly, the invention relates to the application of pavement marking materials to a road, runway, or any other type of surface by a moving vehicle.
BACKGROUND
It is well known that roadways, runways and other types of surfaces need to have lines or intermittent stripes painted on them to guide traffic, airplanes, etc. A pavement marking material such as, for example, conventional paint, epoxy, or thermoplastic (referred to herein generally as “paint”) is used to create a visible stripe paint line. Glass beads are applied to the freshly painted surface immediately after the pavement marking material is applied. The glass beads serve to make the stripes or lines more visible because they reflect light, such as from a vehicle's headlights.
Typically, a flatbed truck is configured to carry all the necessary supplies and equipment so that pavement marking material and beads can be applied to the road surface in an economical fashion. An average truck used to apply beads and pavement marking materials, referred to herein as a paint truck, has 2 pavement marking material (“paint”) tanks of approximately 250 gallons each and 1 bead tank. The bead tank is usually large enough to hold sufficient beads for application to the pavement marking materials in the paint tanks. In operation, paint trucks may travel as fast as 25 mph while painting continuous or intermittent paint lines on the road surface.
“Airless” and “atomized air” are the “systems” most frequently used to apply paint. Beads are generally applied using “pressure pot” systems. Regardless which system or combination of systems is being used, the equipment for the systems is typically mounted on a flatbed truck.
In an airless system, the paint is delivered to a high pressure pump, usually a piston pump, which pumps the paint through a small nozzle on the end of a paint gun without mixing air with the paint, and thereby creates the paint line on the roadway.
In an atomized air pressure pot system, the paint storage tank (also referred to as a “paint pot” or “pressure pot”) is pressurized up to approximately 120 lbs. of pressure. This pressure forces the paint from the tank and out through the paint gun. In the paint gun of an atomized air system, air is mixed with the paint at the nozzle and creates the paint line on the roadway. A pressure pot system does not utilize a pump to move the paint like the airless system.
Because an aspect of the present invention involves repeatedly weighing one or both of the paint and bead storage tanks, the present invention is not limited by the type of system being employed and is suitable for use with both airless and atomized air systems.
To better appreciate the value of the present invention, some background on how pavement striping jobs are normally specified and bid is provided. There is usually a specific amount of paint and beads that one is required to apply per foot to meet the manufacturer's and owner's specification. An example of a common specification is 300 lineal feet of a 4 inch wide paint line and 6 lbs. of beads per gallon of paint. Many contractors doing striping work, however, rely on nothing more than intuition and experience to determine the quantities of paint and beads they are applying.
Further, because there are many opportunities for unscrupulous contractors to cheat (for example, if a contractor has not been applying enough paint or beads figures this out at the end of the day when he has more paint left in his tank than he should, he has an incentive to dump the extra paint or apply extra paint at the end of the day so that when the state Department of Transportation (“DOT”) official checks how much paint was used it appears that the amount the specification called for was used), it would be highly beneficial if a device or method existed so that a contractor could more closely monitor the amount of paint being applied. In addition to the obvious benefits to the contractor of actually knowing the quantities of materials being used, he could provide a written record of this information to the DOT or whatever other agency specified the job to prove compliance with the specification.
Environmental factors and other conditions can also affect the amount of paint being used. Temperature variations affect both atomized air and airless systems. When temperatures are relatively colder, paint does not flow as well and thus it is possible that less paint than the specification calls for will be applied to the roadway. Also, over the course of a day, the ambient temperature tends to change. As the temperature rises or falls, the amount of paint being applied can change. In addition, when the glass beads sit overnight they can collect moisture as a result of condensation. This excess moisture can cause the beads not to flow as well as they would when they were dry. Both pressure pot and airless systems also utilize filters. The filters are prone to clog to varying degrees. When this occurs the amount of paint being applied to the roadway is reduced.
All of the above conditions may occur in the course of a single project. Being able to more accurately monitor the amount of paint and/or beads being applied allows the contractor to immediately make adjustments to compensate for such conditions rather than his finding out at the end of the day that he has been applying to little paint to meet the specification for much of the day because one of the paintgun filters clogged early in the day.
Other factors which can affect the amount of paint being used include the pressure at which the paint is being applied to the surface of the pavement and the speed of the paint truck.
Yet another benefit of constantly monitoring paint and/or bead usage would be that the contractor could accurately determine when the supply of paint and/or beads in the tanks on the truck will run out. That is important because in many situations the tanks on the painting truck can not readily be refilled. For example, on interstate highways, safety regulations prohibit filling the paint and or bead tanks on paint trucks on the interstate highway. The paint truck must exit the interstate prior to refilling its tanks. If a contractor knows that the paint and/or bead supply is running low, he or she can exit the interstate at a convenient time prior to running out of paint and/or beads. If the contractor runs out he has to drive to the next exit, get refilled, then backtrack far enough to get back to the point where he ran out. This results in a waste of time. The problem of such inefficiencies—and how they are magnified—becomes clear when one appreciates that a paint truck must always operate with several other traffic control vehicles. So it is not one, but several vehicles which must backtrack in these circumstances.
Beyond experience and intuition, certain other devices and methods exist in the prior art for monitoring the amount of materials being used. For both beads and paint tanks, one can measure the amount of materials used to refill the tanks. Whatever volume of materials were used is then divided into the number of lineal feet painted since the last refilling stop to determine material usage. A second method is to use a tape measure to measure the amount the tank holding the material has dropped over a certain distance.
Since one knows the dimensions of the tank he or she can perform calculations to approximate the usage of materials.
Another method entails the use of flow meters, which can be placed in the lines connecting the paint tanks to the discharge nozzles. However, numerous disadvantages arise with flow meters. First, they restrict the flow of paint through the connecting line or lines and, as a result, the truck must be driven at slower speeds. A second problem is that flow meters can only be used with “atomized air” systems and not with “airless” systems. Finally, because flow meters are designed to monitor flow of liquids, they are generally not suitable for measuring the amount of beads being used.
Marthe Timothy J.
Meyer Bradley O.
Fish & Richardson P.C. P.A.
Morris Lesley D.
LandOfFree
Device and method for monitoring the amount of material... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Device and method for monitoring the amount of material..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device and method for monitoring the amount of material... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2922479