Device and method for controlling in-vivo pressure

Surgery – Devices transferring fluids from within one area of body to... – With flow control means

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S008000, C604S007000, C623S001240, C138S045000, C138S046000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08070708

ABSTRACT:
A differential pressure regulating device is provided for controlling in-vivo pressure in a body, and in particularly in a heart. The device may include a shunt being positioned between two or more lumens in a body, to enable fluids to flow between the lumens, and an adjustable flow regulation mechanism being configured to selectively cover an opening of the shunt, to regulate the flow of fluid through the shunt in relation to a pressure difference between the body lumens. In some embodiments a control mechanism coupled to the adjustable flow regulation mechanism may be provided, to remotely activate the adjustable flow regulation mechanism.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3874388 (1975-04-01), King et al.
patent: 4601309 (1986-07-01), Chang
patent: 4662355 (1987-05-01), Pieronne et al.
patent: 4705507 (1987-11-01), Boyles
patent: 4979955 (1990-12-01), Smith
patent: 4995857 (1991-02-01), Arnold
patent: 5186431 (1993-02-01), Tamari
patent: 5267940 (1993-12-01), Moulder
patent: 5290227 (1994-03-01), Pasque
patent: 5326374 (1994-07-01), Ilbawi et al.
patent: 5332402 (1994-07-01), Teitelbaum
patent: 5334217 (1994-08-01), Das
patent: 5409019 (1995-04-01), Wilk
patent: 5429144 (1995-07-01), Wilk
patent: 5500015 (1996-03-01), Deac
patent: 5556386 (1996-09-01), Todd
patent: 5584803 (1996-12-01), Stevens et al.
patent: 5597377 (1997-01-01), Aldea
patent: 5655548 (1997-08-01), Nelson et al.
patent: 5662711 (1997-09-01), Douglas
patent: 5725552 (1998-03-01), Kotula et al.
patent: 5795307 (1998-08-01), Krueger
patent: 5824071 (1998-10-01), Nelson et al.
patent: 5916193 (1999-06-01), Stevens et al.
patent: 5957949 (1999-09-01), Leonhardt et al.
patent: 6039759 (2000-03-01), Carpentier et al.
patent: 6126686 (2000-10-01), Badylak et al.
patent: 6165188 (2000-12-01), Saadat et al.
patent: 6210318 (2001-04-01), Lederman
patent: 6217541 (2001-04-01), Yu
patent: 6254564 (2001-07-01), Wilk et al.
patent: 6270526 (2001-08-01), Cox
patent: 6277078 (2001-08-01), Porat et al.
patent: 6302892 (2001-10-01), Wilk
patent: 6344022 (2002-02-01), Jarvik
patent: 6358277 (2002-03-01), Duran
patent: 6447539 (2002-09-01), Nelson et al.
patent: 6458153 (2002-10-01), Bailey et al.
patent: 6468303 (2002-10-01), Amplatz et al.
patent: 6527698 (2003-03-01), Kung et al.
patent: 6544208 (2003-04-01), Ethier et al.
patent: 6562066 (2003-05-01), Martin
patent: 6572652 (2003-06-01), Shaknovich
patent: 6589198 (2003-07-01), Soltanpour et al.
patent: 6632169 (2003-10-01), Korakianitis et al.
patent: 6638303 (2003-10-01), Campbell
patent: 6641610 (2003-11-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 7001409 (2006-02-01), Amplatz
patent: 7294115 (2007-11-01), Wilk
patent: 2002/0165606 (2002-11-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 2002/0173742 (2002-11-01), Keren et al.
patent: 2003/0100920 (2003-05-01), Akin et al.
patent: 2003/0125798 (2003-07-01), Martin
patent: 2003/0216679 (2003-11-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 2004/0010219 (2004-01-01), McCusker et al.
patent: 2004/0077988 (2004-04-01), Tweden et al.
patent: 2004/0088045 (2004-05-01), Cox
patent: 2004/0093075 (2004-05-01), Kuehne
patent: 2004/0147869 (2004-07-01), Wolf et al.
patent: 2004/0147871 (2004-07-01), Burnett
patent: 2004/0162514 (2004-08-01), Alferness et al.
patent: 2004/0210190 (2004-10-01), Kohler et al.
patent: 2004/0210307 (2004-10-01), Khairkhahan
patent: 2005/0033351 (2005-02-01), Newton
patent: 2005/0148925 (2005-07-01), Rottenberg et al.
patent: 2005/0165344 (2005-07-01), Dobak, III
patent: 2006/0116710 (2006-06-01), Corcoran et al.
patent: 2006/0122647 (2006-06-01), Callaghan et al.
patent: 2006/0167541 (2006-07-01), Lattouf
patent: 2007/0010852 (2007-01-01), Blaeser et al.
patent: 2007/0299384 (2007-12-01), Faul et al.
patent: 2008/0262602 (2008-10-01), Wilk et al.
patent: 2827153 (2003-01-01), None
patent: WO 99/60941 (1999-12-01), None
patent: WO 2005/027752 (2005-03-01), None
patent: WO 2005/074367 (2005-08-01), None
Abstract of journal article: Stormer, et al., Comparative study of in vitro flow characteristics between a human aortic valve and a designed ortic valve and six corresponding types of prosthetic heart valves. European Surgical Research, 1976: 8(2) p. 117-31.
Official Action Dated Jul. 10, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Nov. 12, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Supplementary European Search Report Dated Nov. 13, 2009 From the European Patent Office Re.: Application No. 05703174.2.
International Search Report Dated Apr. 7, 2008 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL05/00131.
Notification of Reasons of Rejection Dated Dec. 17, 2009 From the Japanese Patent Office Re.: Application No. 2006-552005 and Its Translation Into English.
Office Action Dated Jul. 30, 2007 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/048,807.
Official Action Dated Mar. 4, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 11/048,807.
Official Action Dated Aug. 9, 2002 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Dec. 16, 2008 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Jan. 16, 2003 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Feb. 24, 2006 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Jun. 27, 2005 From US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Jul. 29, 2004 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Official Action Dated Jan. 7, 2005 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Response Dated Jan. 19, 2010 to Official Action of Nov. 12, 2009 From the US Patent and Trademark Office Re.: U.S. Appl. No. 09/839,643.
Written Opinion Dated Apr. 7, 2008 From the International Searching Authority Re.: Application No. PCT/IL05/00131.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/107,832, filed May 13, 2011, Keren et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/107,843, filed May 13, 2011, Keren et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,672, filed May 16, 2011, Rottenberg et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,698, filed May 16, 2011, Rottenberg et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,850, filed May 16, 2011, Rottenberg et al.
U.S. Appl. no. 13/108,880, filed May 16, 2011, Nitzan et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,309, filed Jul. 28, 2011, Nitzan et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/193,335, filed Jul. 28, 2011, Nitzan et al.
Case et al., “Relief of High Left-Atrial Pressure in Left-Ventricular Failure,” Lancet, pp. 841-842 (Oct. 17, 1964).
Ennezat et al., “An unusual case of low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis: Left-to-right shunt due to atrial septal defect,” Cardiology 113(2): 146-148 (2009).
Ewert et al., “Acute left heart failure after interventional occlusion of an atrial septal defect,” Z Kardiol. 90(5): 362-366 (May 2001).
Ewert et al., “Masked left ventricular restriction in elderly patients with atrial septal defects: A contraindication for closure?” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 52: 177-180 (2001).
Geiran et al., “Changes in cardiac dynamics by opening an interventricular shunt in dogs,” J. Surg. Res. 48(1): 6-12 (Jan. 1990).
Gelernter-Yaniv et al., “Transcatheter closure of left-to-right interatrial shunts to resolve hypoxemia,” Congenit. Heart Dis. 31(1): 47-53 (Jan. 2008).
Gewillig et al., “Creation with a stent of an unrestrictive lasting atrial communication,” Cardio. Young 12(4): 404-407 (2002).
Lai et al., “Bidirectional shunt through a residual atrial septal defect after percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy,” Cardiology 83(3): 205-207 (1993).
Lemmer et al., “Surgical implications of atrial septal defect complicating aortic balloon valvuloplasty,” Ann. Thorac. Surg. 48(2): 295-297 (Aug. 1989).
Schubert et al., “Left ventricular conditioning in the elderly patient to prevent congestive heart failure after transcatheter closure of the atrial septal defect,” Catheter

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Device and method for controlling in-vivo pressure does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Device and method for controlling in-vivo pressure, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Device and method for controlling in-vivo pressure will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4307594

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.