Radiation imagery chemistry: process – composition – or product th – Electric or magnetic imagery – e.g. – xerography,... – Post imaging process – finishing – or perfecting composition...
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-26
2003-08-26
Goodrow, John (Department: 1756)
Radiation imagery chemistry: process, composition, or product th
Electric or magnetic imagery, e.g., xerography,...
Post imaging process, finishing, or perfecting composition...
C430S108600, C430S108700
Reexamination Certificate
active
06610451
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to magnetic toners and development systems for magnetic toners.
Magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) printing has been used for many years for checks and negotiable documents as well as for other documents in need of high speed reading and sorting. Various electrophotographic printers which are capable of printing magnetic inks or toners have been available from such sources as IBM and Kodak. Typically, the toner or ink used for MICR applications contains a heavy loading of iron oxide or other magnetic material in order to obtain the required adequate magnetic signal strength for speed reading and sorting and the like. However, MICR toner having such heavy iron oxide loadings can be quite difficult to manufacture since an adequate dispersion of the iron oxide particles in the toner resin, for instance, is hard to achieve and maintain. Furthermore, the resulting image quality from the MICR toner can be degraded relative to images made with normal toner due to decreased toning and fusing efficiencies resulting from the magnetic loadings that are required in the toner.
Accordingly, there is a significant trade off that currently occurs in the MICR technology; namely, a significant amount of magnetic loadings are required in order to achieve the necessary magnetic signal strength and yet this same magnetic loading leads to degraded images or images that have low quality. In order to obtain a higher image quality, the magnetic loading would need to be reduced which would then jeopardize the necessary magnetic signal strength that is required. Accordingly, the industry has simply accepted the lower quality of image in view of the need for the adequate magnetic signal strength that must be present in the MICR toner. Currently, MICR toners in the industry range in iron oxide loadings of up to and even above 50% by weight of the toner. With a loading of over 28% by weight Fe
3
O
4
in a conventional MICR developer for an IBM 3828 MICR printer (2 component developer using a soft magnetic carrier), the signal strength for the release toner is between 120% and 140% average signal strength of the “on-us” characters as measured on a DOCU-MATE Check Reader. This 120% signal strength is sufficient and required to compensate for character voids and otherwise low density individual image. However, as indicated above, using such a toner, no matter what currently available printer or development system is used, typically leads to image quality which is at best mediocre.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3716630 (1973-02-01), Shirk
patent: 3893935 (1975-07-01), Jadwin et al.
patent: 3941898 (1976-03-01), Sadamatsu et al.
patent: 3983992 (1976-10-01), Gray et al.
patent: 4076857 (1978-02-01), Kasper et al.
patent: 4385823 (1983-05-01), Kasper et al.
patent: 4473029 (1984-09-01), Fritz et al.
patent: 4546060 (1985-10-01), Miskinis et al.
patent: 4556624 (1985-12-01), Gruber et al.
patent: 4578338 (1986-03-01), Gruber et al.
patent: 4609603 (1986-09-01), Knapp et al.
patent: 4634649 (1987-01-01), Knapp et al.
patent: 4690603 (1987-09-01), Graner
patent: 4695524 (1987-09-01), Knapp et al.
patent: 4758493 (1988-07-01), Young et al.
patent: 4859550 (1989-08-01), Gruber et al.
patent: 4883736 (1989-11-01), Hoffend et al.
patent: RE33172 (1990-02-01), Gruber et al.
patent: 5057392 (1991-10-01), McCabe et al.
patent: 5089547 (1992-02-01), McCabe et al.
patent: 5102755 (1992-04-01), Ruhland et al.
patent: 5102765 (1992-04-01), McCabe et al.
patent: 5112715 (1992-05-01), DeMejo et al.
patent: 5124217 (1992-06-01), Gruber et al.
patent: 5124271 (1992-06-01), Havemann
patent: 5147747 (1992-09-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5344737 (1994-09-01), Berkes et al.
patent: 5358814 (1994-10-01), Osterhoudt et al.
patent: 5358815 (1994-10-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5358816 (1994-10-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5358817 (1994-10-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5358818 (1994-10-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5389482 (1995-02-01), Okano et al.
patent: 5439772 (1995-08-01), Takagi et al.
patent: 5482805 (1996-01-01), Grande et al.
patent: 5486443 (1996-01-01), Grande et al.
patent: 5510221 (1996-04-01), Matalevich et al.
patent: 5552252 (1996-09-01), Lundy et al.
patent: 5780190 (1998-07-01), Listigovers et al.
patent: 5780195 (1998-07-01), Nava
patent: 5914209 (1999-06-01), Grushkin
patent: 5952138 (1999-09-01), Kuwashima et al.
patent: 5976748 (1999-11-01), Arai et al.
patent: 5998076 (1999-12-01), Mahabadi et al.
patent: 6075965 (2000-06-01), Tombs et al.
patent: 6083654 (2000-07-01), Lin
patent: 6228549 (2001-05-01), Lambert et al.
patent: 1 501 065 (1976-07-01), None
patent: 0 003 905 (1979-09-01), None
Crichton John F.
Fields Robert D.
Jadwin Thomas A.
Stelter Eric C.
Goodrow John
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
LandOfFree
Development systems for magnetic toners having reduced... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Development systems for magnetic toners having reduced..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Development systems for magnetic toners having reduced... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3122459