Electrophotography – Image formation – Development
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-09
2004-11-16
Brase, Sandra L. (Department: 2852)
Electrophotography
Image formation
Development
C399S267000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06819901
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an image forming method for developing a latent image by use of a magnetic force and an apparatus therefor.
In a copier, printer, facsimile apparatus or similar electrophotographic or electrostatic image forming apparatus, a latent image is formed on an image carrier in accordance with image data. The image carrier is implemented as a photoconductive drum or belt by way of example. A developing unit develops the latent image with toner to thereby form a corresponding toner image.
The developing unit uses either one of a one-ingredient type developer, or toner, and a two-ingredient type developer or toner and magnetic carrier mixture. The two-ingredient type developer allows the charge of the toner to be controlled more easily than the one-ingredient type developer and causes a minimum of-cohesion to occur in the toner. With the two-ingredient type developer therefore, it is possible to execute effective control over the migration of the toner by using, e.g., a bias electric field. Further, the toner of this type of developer does not have to contain a magnetic material or contains only a minimum amount of magnetic material for obviating blurring. Therefore, a color toner in particular insures a clear color. Moreover, in the case of a magnet brush developing method that causes a developer layer to rub the surface of an image carrier, a magnet brush easily rises and desirably rubs itself against the above surface. The two-ingredient type of developer with such advantages is often used despite that the toner content of the developer must be controlled.
However, a problem with the developing unit using the two-ingredient type developer is that a single-dot line formed in the direction perpendicular to the direction of paper conveyance becomes thinner than a single-dot line formed in the direction of paper conveyance. This phenomenon will be referred to as the thinning of a horizontal line hereinafter. Another problem is that the trailing edge of, e.g., a halftone image is lowered in density or not developed at all. Let this phenomenon be referred to as the omission of a trailing edge hereinafter. To solve these problems, there has been proposed to position the main pole angle of a magnet roller at an upstream side or to set up a preselected relation between the distance between a doctor blade and a developing sleeve and the distance between a photoconductive drum and the developing sleeve, as taught in, e.g., Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 7-140730. The prerequisites with this kind of scheme are as follows:
(1) The main pole for development is positioned in a range of from 5° to 20° upstream of a position where the developing sleeve and photoconductive drum are closest to each other in a direction of developer conveyance (closest position hereinafter);
(2) The doctor blade and developer carrier are spaced by a distance (Hcut) of 0.25 mm to 0.75 mm;
(3) A nip for development extends over 0.30 mm to 0.80 mm (Dsd);
(4) A ratio Dsd/Hcut is greater than 1.20, but smaller than 1.60; and
(5) A ratio of the moving speed Vs of the developer carrier to the moving speed Vp of the image carrier (Vs/Vp) is greater than or equal to 1.0, but smaller than or equal to 3.0.
It is generally accepted that if the above conditions (1) through (5) are satisfied, a toner layer is protected from disturbance in halftone and solid portions when the apparatus is operated in a high-speed range. This allows a clear-cut image to be produced without any breakage of thin lines and with high and uniform density.
There is a keen demand for an improvement in the developing ability of the apparatus using the two-ingredient type developer. In this respect, Japanese Patent Publication No. 2-59995, for example, proposes to position a magnetic pole adjoining the main pole closer to the main pole. This document teaches that such a position of the magnetic pole lowers the density of horizontal lines, i.e., the thinning of a horizontal line, but the lower density can be coped with if the saturation magnetization of the carrier is lowered to weaken the magnet brush. Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 6-149063 discloses a non-contact type developing device using the two-ingredient type developer and having a pole arrangement that maintains a magnet brush spaced from a photoconductive element. The prerequisites with this pole arrangement are as follows:
(1) A developing position is defined between a pair of N and S poles;
(2) The angle between the N and S poles is between 40° and 70° while each flux density is 500 or above; and
(3) A magnet angle between a point where an image forming body and a magnet brush roll are closest to each other and the center between the poles is between 0° and one-tenth of the above angle between the N and S poles, and the developing position is between the poles of the magnet.
The document describes that if the above conditions (1) through (3) are satisfied, a stable, high quality image is achievable with a minimum of blurring ascribable to the deposition of the carrier on the image forming body and a minimum of omission of an image around portions where the carrier is deposited.
In accordance with the above-described Laid-Open Publication No. 7-140730, the ratio Dsd/Hcut is confined in the range of 1.2<Dsd/Hcut<1.6. The problem with this scheme is that as the ratio Dsd/Hcut increases from 1, i.e., as Hcut decreases relative to Dsd, the magnet brush decreases in density in the closest position of the developing sleeve and photoconductive element. As a result, the magnet brush fails to uniformly contact the photoconductive element and cannot rub the entire surface of the element. This leads to an occurrence that part of solitary dots forming an image (e.g. dots sized 600 dpi (dots per inch) and spaced from each other by five to ten pixels) is reduced in size or practically omitted. When solitary dots are not uniformly reproduced, the reproducibility and tonality of a high contrast portion are deteriorated. Further, a halftone image whose density is about 0.3 to about 0.8 (ID) appears granular due to the non-uniform contact of the magnet brush.
The scheme taught in Publication No. 2-59995 mentioned earlier has a drawback that when the saturation magnetization of the carrier is lowered, so-called carrier deposition is aggravated. When the amount of charge to deposit on the toner is reduced in order to obviate carrier deposition, the amount of uncharged toner increases and brings about background contamination.
The implementation taught in Laid-Open Publication No. 6-149063 also mentioned earlier has a problem that the electric field for development is weak due to non-contact development, making it difficult to improve the developing ability.
By a series of experiments, we found that the thinning of a horizontal line and the omission of a trailing edge were presumably ascribable to the same cause. As the developer on the developing sleeve approaches the closest position of the sleeve and photoconductive element, it forms the magnet brush and is smashed by the sleeve and the element. In a conventional image forming apparatus, the magnet brush is again formed after it has moved away from the above closest position (downstream of the closest position) and is again caused to contact the photoconductive element. This magnet brush is formed by the magnetic field around the skirt of the main pole, i.e., the pole for development. On the other hand, when the magnet brush faces the background or white portion of the photoconductive element, toner in the magnet brush is biased toward the developing sleeve by a magnetic field corresponding to the background potential. As a result, the toner density at the tip of the magnet brush is lowered. For the development using the toner and magnetic carrier mixture, the developing sleeve is rotated at a peripheral speed 1.5 times to 2.5 times as high as the peripheral speed of the photoconductive element. Consequently, the magnet brush whose toner density is lowered at the tip contacts the
Kai Tsukuru
Shoji Hisashi
Takeuchi Nobutaka
Yasutomi Kei
Brase Sandra L.
Oblon & Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt P.C.
Ricoh & Company, Ltd.
LandOfFree
Developing method and a developing device for image forming... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Developing method and a developing device for image forming..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Developing method and a developing device for image forming... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3338373