Determination of leak and respiratory airflow

Surgery – Respiratory method or device

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C128S204230

Reexamination Certificate

active

06279569

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to methods and apparatus for the determination of leakage airflow and true respiratory airflow, particularly during mechanical ventilation.
The airflow determination can be for a subject who is either spontaneously or non-spontaneously breathing, or moves between these breathing states. The invention is especially suitable for, but not limited to, normally conscious and spontaneously breathing human subjects requiring long term ventilatory assistance, particularly during sleep.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In this specification any reference to a “mask” is to be understood as including all forms of devices for passing breathable gas to a person's airway, including nose masks, nose and mouth masks, nasal prongs/pillows and endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes.
During mechanical ventilation, breathable gas is supplied for example via a mask, at a pressure which is higher during inspiration and lower during expiration. It is useful to measure the subject's respiratory airflow during mechanical ventilation to assess adequacy of treatment, or to control the operation of the ventilator.
Respiratory airflow is commonly measured with a pneumotachograph placed in the gas delivery path between the mask and the ventilator. Leaks between the mask and the subject are unavoidable. The pneumotachograph measures the sum of the respiratory airflow plus the flow through the leak. If the instantaneous flow through the leak is known, the respiratory airflow can be calculated by subtracting the flow through the leak from the flow at the pneumotach.
Known methods to correct for the flow through the leak assume (i) that the leak is substantially constant, and (ii) that over a sufficiently long time, inspiratory and expiratory respiratory airflow will cancel. If these assumptions are met, the average flow through the pneumotach over a sufficiently long period will equal the magnitude of the leak, and the true respiratory airflow may then be calculated as described.
The known method is only correct if the pressure at the mask is constant. If the mask pressure varies with time (for example, in the case of a ventilator), assumption (i) above will be invalid, and the calculated respiratory airflow will therefore be incorrect. This is shown markedly in
FIGS. 1
a
-
1
f.
FIG. 1
a
shows a trace of measured mask pressure in bi-level CPAP treatment between about 4 cm H
2
O on expiration and 12 cm H
2
O on inspiration.
FIG. 1
b
shows a trace of true respiratory airflow in synchronism with the mask pressure. At time=21 seconds a mask leak occurs, resulting in a leakage flow from the leak that is a function of the treatment pressure, as shown in
FIG. 1
c.
The measured mask flow shown in
FIG. 1
d
now includes an offset due to the leak flow. The prior art method then determines the calculated leak flow over a number of breaths, as shown in
FIG. 1
e.
The resulting calculated respiratory flow, as the measured flow minus the calculating leak flow is shown in
FIG. 1
f,
having returned to the correct mean value, however is incorrectly scaled in magnitude, giving a false indication of peak positive and negative airflow.
Another prior art arrangement is disclosed in European Publication No. 0 714 670 A2, including a calculation of a pressure-dependent leak component. The methodology relies on knowing precisely the occurrence of the start of an inspiratory event and the start of the next inspiratory event. In other words, the leak calculation is formed as an average over a known breath and applied to a subsequent breath.
This method cannot be used if the moment of start and end of the previous breath are unknown. In general, it can be difficult to accurately calculate the time of start of a breath. This is particularly the case immediately following a sudden change in the leak.
Furthermore, the method will not work in the case of a subject who is making no respiratory efforts, and is momentarily not being ventilated at all, for example during an apnea, because for the duration of the apnea there is no start or end of breath over which to make a calculation.
The present invention seeks to provide a determination of leak flow and true respiratory airflow, accounting for the variations in flow through a leak as a function of pressure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is a method for determining an instantaneous leak flow from a patient mask during mechanical ventilation including the acts of continuously determining values for pressure in the mask and airflow through the mask; calculating conductance of a leak as a function of the values for pressure and airflow determined over a time interval; and calculating the instantaneous leak flow as a function of the calculated leak conductance and the instantaneous determined value of mask pressure.
Embodiments of the invention provide advantages over the prior art. There is no need to know when transitions between respiratory phases occurs. The independence from knowledge of the subject's respiratory state has the important result that the leak flow calculation is accurate in apneic (i.e. no flow) instances on the part of the subject or the mechanical ventilator.


REFERENCES:
patent: Re. 35295 (1996-07-01), Estes et al.
patent: Re. 35339 (1996-10-01), Rapoport
patent: 2904033 (1959-09-01), Shane
patent: 3099985 (1963-08-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 3502100 (1970-03-01), Jonson
patent: 3559638 (1971-02-01), Potter
patent: 3595228 (1971-07-01), Simon et al.
patent: 3611801 (1971-10-01), Paine et al.
patent: 3726270 (1973-04-01), Griffis et al.
patent: 3741208 (1973-06-01), Jonsson et al.
patent: 3783893 (1974-01-01), Davison
patent: 3802417 (1974-04-01), Lang
patent: 3817246 (1974-06-01), Weigl
patent: 3882847 (1975-05-01), Jacobs
patent: 3903875 (1975-09-01), Hughes
patent: 3914994 (1975-10-01), Banner
patent: 3932054 (1976-01-01), McKelvey
patent: 3985467 (1976-10-01), Lefferson
patent: 3989037 (1976-11-01), Franetzki
patent: 3992598 (1976-11-01), Welsh et al.
patent: 3995661 (1976-12-01), Van Fossen
patent: 4006634 (1977-02-01), Billette et al.
patent: 4083245 (1978-04-01), Osborn
patent: 4109749 (1978-08-01), Sweet
patent: 4119096 (1978-10-01), Drews
patent: 4206754 (1980-06-01), Cox et al.
patent: 4249527 (1981-02-01), Ko et al.
patent: 4301833 (1981-11-01), Donald, III
patent: 4312235 (1982-01-01), Daigle
patent: 4320766 (1982-03-01), Alihanka et al.
patent: 4322594 (1982-03-01), Brissou
patent: 4381788 (1983-05-01), Douglas
patent: 4387722 (1983-06-01), Kearns
patent: 4396034 (1983-08-01), Cherniak
patent: 4414982 (1983-11-01), Durkan
patent: 4433693 (1984-02-01), Hochstein
patent: 4448058 (1984-05-01), Jaffe et al.
patent: 4449525 (1984-05-01), White et al.
patent: 4481944 (1984-11-01), Bunnell
patent: 4499914 (1985-02-01), Schebler
patent: 4506666 (1985-03-01), Durkan
patent: 4519399 (1985-05-01), Hori
patent: 4530334 (1985-07-01), Pagdin
patent: 4550615 (1985-11-01), Grant
patent: 4550726 (1985-11-01), McEwen
patent: 4558710 (1985-12-01), Eichler
patent: 4570631 (1986-02-01), Durkan
patent: 4576179 (1986-03-01), Manus et al.
patent: 4579114 (1986-04-01), Gray et al.
patent: 4580575 (1986-04-01), Birnbaum et al.
patent: 4592880 (1986-06-01), Murakami
patent: 4595016 (1986-06-01), Fertig et al.
patent: 4602644 (1986-07-01), DiBenedetto et al.
patent: 4630614 (1986-12-01), Atlas
patent: 4648396 (1987-03-01), Raemer
patent: 4648407 (1987-03-01), Sackner
patent: 4655213 (1987-04-01), Rapoport et al.
patent: 4677975 (1987-07-01), Edgar et al.
patent: 4686974 (1987-08-01), Sato et al.
patent: 4686999 (1987-08-01), Snyder et al.
patent: 4738266 (1988-04-01), Thatcher
patent: 4747403 (1988-05-01), Gluck et al.
patent: 4773411 (1988-09-01), Downs
patent: 4777963 (1988-10-01), McKenna
patent: 4795314 (1989-01-01), Prybella et al.
patent: 4802485 (1989-02-01), Bowers et al.
patent: 4803471 (1989-02-01), Rowland
patent: 4819629 (1989-04-01), Jonson
patent: 4823788 (1989-04-01), Smith et al.
patent: 4825802 (1989-05-01), Le Bec
patent: 4827922 (1989-05-01), Champain et al.
patent: 4838258 (1989-06-01), Dryd

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Determination of leak and respiratory airflow does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Determination of leak and respiratory airflow, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Determination of leak and respiratory airflow will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2529837

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.