Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Image superposition by optical means
Patent
1995-04-21
1999-01-26
Hjerpe, Richard A.
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Image superposition by optical means
359631, 359630, G09G 500
Patent
active
058643265
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to visual displays which combine generated images with the view of the environment surrounding a user and transmit such combined visual information to the eye position of the user.
BACKGROUND ART
It is often desirable to provide visual information to a living being, usually a person. Frequently one wishes to superimpose such visual information upon the being's view of the real world.
Such a display requires, in a form known as a folded catadioptric display, an image generator; a beam splitter, which receives the image light from the image generator and sends a fraction, designated the reflected fraction, of such image light to a reflective combiner that both allows light from the real world to pass through such combiner and reflects the image light such that both the real-world light and the image light are transmitted to the eye of the user through the beam splitter.
The beam splitter will transmit a fraction, designated the transmitted fraction, of the image light reflected from the collimator-combiner. Of course, only a fraction of the real-world light is also transmitted by the beam splitter.
To correct for aberrations and distortions produced by the beam splitter and the combiner, a correction lens is often placed in the optical path between the image generator and the beam splitter.
Another beneficial process in a visual display is depixelation of the image.
The image generators that are well known in the art, such as a cathode ray tube and a liquid crystal display, produce an image composed of a multiplicity of pixels. Each pixel is a point of light. Since adjacent pixels do not contact each other, every pixel is surrounded by a dark area. The combiner magnifies the image, causing the dark area to be perceptible and thereby detracting from the accurate portrayal of the image one wishes to depict.
Depixelation traditionally comprises blurring the edges of the pixels without losing resolution or contrast. In fact, perceived resolution--although necessarily somewhat subjective--appears to be increased by depixelation. And, in the case of triads of colored pixels, depixelation blends the colors together.
In U.S. application Ser. No. 07/832,237, the inventor achieves depixelation of a liquid crystal display through the placement of a fiber optic faceplate between the liquid crystal display and the beam splitter, a fold mirror in that case, in such a manner that the input numerical aperture of the faceplate is approximately equal to twice the pixel size of the liquid crystal display divided by the distance between the fiber optic faceplate and the pixels.
A second process for achieving depixelation with a fiber optic faceplate involves simply placing the source of light for the liquid crystal display near the rear of the pixel plane of the liquid crystal display. Since the input surface of the faceplate is a finite distance in front of the pixel plane of the liquid crystal display, the image of each pixel on the input surface of the faceplate is not only enlarged, but also covers a greater portion of the total picture, correspondingly decreasing the amount of dark area surrounding each pixel. Also, the small size of each pixel causes considerable diffraction of the light which passes the edge of the pixel.
A common and third technique for depixelation is locating a weak diffuser plate a short distance from the pixels, in the direction of the beam splitter.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
The diffusion produced by the weak diffuser plate is, however, in random directions, as is the diffraction associated with the edge of the pixels, which was discussed above with respect to the second technique for depixelation.
And when a fiber optic faceplate is utilized, a diffuse source of light cannot be employed because it would create an image of each pixel on the input surface of the faceplate which would be excessively large. This forces the use of an incandescent lamp, which produces more heat; and heat can negatively affect liquid crystal displays.
The present invention intr
REFERENCES:
patent: D300476 (1989-03-01), Sestak
patent: D301644 (1989-06-01), Sestak
patent: D334557 (1993-04-01), Hunter et al.
patent: D334742 (1993-04-01), Hunter et al.
patent: D337320 (1993-07-01), Hunter et al.
patent: D338514 (1993-08-01), Holmes
patent: 2955156 (1960-10-01), Heilig
patent: 3043910 (1962-07-01), Hicks
patent: 3589795 (1971-06-01), Miyazaki et al.
patent: 3614314 (1971-10-01), Rossire
patent: 3737212 (1973-06-01), Antonson et al.
patent: 3874783 (1975-04-01), Cole
patent: 3915548 (1975-10-01), Opittek et al.
patent: 3923370 (1975-12-01), Mostrom
patent: 3940204 (1976-02-01), Withrington
patent: 4028725 (1977-06-01), Lewis
patent: 4042957 (1977-08-01), Ellis
patent: 4048653 (1977-09-01), Spooner
patent: 4257062 (1981-03-01), Meredith
patent: 4269476 (1981-05-01), Gauthier et al.
patent: 4310849 (1982-01-01), Glass
patent: 4322135 (1982-03-01), Greeman
patent: 4348185 (1982-09-01), Breglia et al.
patent: 4361384 (1982-11-01), Bosserman
patent: 4385803 (1983-05-01), Ellis
patent: 4395731 (1983-07-01), Schoolman
patent: 4398799 (1983-08-01), Swift
patent: 4437113 (1984-03-01), Lee et al.
patent: 4439157 (1984-03-01), Breglia et al.
patent: 4446480 (1984-05-01), Breglia et al.
patent: 4465347 (1984-08-01), Task et al.
patent: 4468101 (1984-08-01), Ellis
patent: 4550984 (1985-11-01), Reymond
patent: 4559555 (1985-12-01), Schoolman
patent: 4561723 (1985-12-01), Hamano et al.
patent: 4571628 (1986-02-01), Thornton
patent: 4636866 (1987-01-01), Hattori
patent: 4641931 (1987-02-01), Loy
patent: 4651201 (1987-03-01), Schoolman
patent: 4652870 (1987-03-01), Steward
patent: 4695129 (1987-09-01), Faessen et al.
patent: 4706117 (1987-11-01), Schoolman
patent: 4711512 (1987-12-01), Upatnieks
patent: 4737972 (1988-04-01), Schoolman
patent: 4743200 (1988-05-01), Welch et al.
patent: 4753514 (1988-06-01), Kubik
patent: 4757714 (1988-07-01), Purdy et al.
patent: 4761056 (1988-08-01), Evans et al.
patent: 4763990 (1988-08-01), Wood
patent: 4775217 (1988-10-01), Ellis
patent: 4786966 (1988-11-01), Hanson et al.
patent: 4796987 (1989-01-01), Linden
patent: 4797736 (1989-01-01), Kloots et al.
patent: 4799765 (1989-01-01), Ferrer
patent: 4805988 (1989-02-01), Dones
patent: 4806011 (1989-02-01), Bettinger
patent: 4807202 (1989-02-01), Cherri et al.
patent: 4826287 (1989-05-01), Cook et al.
patent: 4853764 (1989-08-01), Sutter
patent: 4859030 (1989-08-01), Rotier
patent: 4859031 (1989-08-01), Berman et al.
patent: 4867551 (1989-09-01), Perera
patent: 4869575 (1989-09-01), Kubik
patent: 4874214 (1989-10-01), Cheyason et al.
patent: 4874235 (1989-10-01), Webster
patent: 4884137 (1989-11-01), Hanson et al.
patent: 4884219 (1989-11-01), Waldren
patent: 4897715 (1990-01-01), Beamon
patent: 4900133 (1990-02-01), Berman
patent: 4902083 (1990-02-01), Wells
patent: 4902116 (1990-02-01), Ellis
patent: 4902120 (1990-02-01), Weyer
patent: 4904049 (1990-02-01), Hegg
patent: 4907132 (1990-03-01), Parker
patent: 4930888 (1990-06-01), Freisleben et al.
patent: 4932731 (1990-06-01), Suzuki et al.
patent: 4933755 (1990-06-01), Dahl et al.
patent: 4934773 (1990-06-01), Becker
patent: 4952024 (1990-08-01), Gale
patent: 4961625 (1990-10-01), Wood et al.
patent: 4961626 (1990-10-01), Fournier et al.
patent: 4968123 (1990-11-01), Fournier et al.
patent: 4969714 (1990-11-01), Fournier et al.
patent: 4969724 (1990-11-01), Ellis
patent: 4970589 (1990-11-01), Hanson et al.
patent: 4982278 (1991-01-01), Dahl et al.
patent: 4983014 (1991-01-01), Nattermann
patent: 4984179 (1991-01-01), Waldern
patent: 4993790 (1991-02-01), Vick
patent: 4995165 (1991-02-01), Daniels
patent: 5003300 (1991-03-01), Wells
patent: 5005213 (1991-04-01), Hanson et al.
patent: 5019828 (1991-05-01), Schoolman
patent: 5034809 (1991-07-01), Katoh
patent: 5035473 (1991-07-01), Kuwayama et al.
patent: 5039198 (1991-08-01), VanBeek
patent: 5046827 (1991-09-01), Frost et al.
patent: 5050966 (1991-09-01), Berman
patent: 5053755 (1991-10-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5081542 (1992-01-01), Efron et al.
patent: 5089903 (1992-02
Hjerpe Richard A.
i-O Display Systems LLC
Osorio Ricardo
LandOfFree
Depixelated visual display does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Depixelated visual display, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Depixelated visual display will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1453496