Deer repellent

Details Deer repellent Deer repellent

2002-09-03

2003-11-04

Levy, Neil S. (Department: 1616)

Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions

Preparations characterized by special physical form

Biocides; animal or insect repellents or attractants

C424S405000, C424S407000, C426S001000, C426S002000, C514S517000, C514S920000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06641830

ABSTRACT:

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
Not Applicable
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
Not Applicable
REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(0001) Deer browse in New Jersey is a large problem for many homeowners, landscapers and landscape architects. As a small business owner and wildlife biologist, I believe that if I could mix a spray that could be applied to the plant, shrub or tree that would deter the deer from eating its foliage, I could help solve many of the problems encountered by the previously mentioned individuals.
(0002) Many deer repellents exist on the market. Most only deter the deer for a very short time, while others are offensive to smell. Furthermore, most need to be applied on a constant basis, depending on the weather or watering schedule, and are inconvenient for the user.
(0003) As a small business, only products exempted by the Environmental Protection Agency could be used, due to the high costs and lengthy process of the pesticide registration process. After experimenting with many mixes, a combination of milk, eggs, corn oil and sodium lauryl sulfate worked the best, and stayed within the Environmental Protection Agency guidelines.
(0004) Once I settled on a solution (0003), I conducted an experiment two different times. Plots of plants were put in a heavy deer browse area, and divided into separate groups. Some groups were sprayed with my formula (0003), some were sprayed with commercial brands, and some were left as controls and sprayed with nothing at all. All plots were sprayed only once and were watered on the same schedule. The controls were immediately eaten within a day or two, while most commercial brands were eaten within a week. My formula lasted over 2 months, with only new growth being lightly browsed after the first month.
(0005) My formula can allow homeowners, landscapers and landscape architects more freedom in their choice of plants and designs. When applied on a monthly basis, the spray can eliminate many of the browse problems caused by deer.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
(0006) Frustration and unwanted spending is encountered by homeowners as well as landscape professionals throughout New Jersey because of the browse damage caused by the heavy concentration of deer.
(0007) A mix of milk, eggs, corn oil and sodium lauryl sulfate was used by myself in experiments to combat the deer browse problem. The formula was spread through a sprayer and compared to other commercial brands as part of a experiment.
(0008) The mix (0007) was not only odorless, unlike many other commercial brands, but it lasted longer, up to and over 2 months in some cases.
(0009) The formula, which is exempt for pesticide registration by the Environmental Protection Agency, when properly applied, can be used to help eliminate unwanted deer browse.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
Not Applicable


REFERENCES:
patent: 3937826 (1976-02-01), Harris
patent: 3980773 (1976-09-01), Oh
patent: 3996349 (1976-12-01), Mulla et al.
patent: 4735803 (1988-04-01), Katz et al.
patent: 5183661 (1993-02-01), Messina
patent: 6001874 (1999-12-01), Veierov

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Deer repellent does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Deer repellent, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Deer repellent will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3158278