DbpA compositions

Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Antigen – epitope – or other immunospecific immunoeffector – Bacterium or component thereof or substance produced by said...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C530S388400, C530S350000, C514S002600

Reexamination Certificate

active

06214355

ABSTRACT:

1. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1.1 Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of molecular biology. More particularly, certain embodiments concern methods and compositions comprising DNA segments, and proteins derived from bacterial species. More particularly, the invention provides gene compositions encoding the decorin (Dcn) binding proteins (DBPs) from
Borrelia burgdorferi
and the corresponding peptide epitopes and protein sequences comprising native and synthetically-modified Dcn binding site domains. Various methods for making and using these DNA segments, DNA segments encoding synthetically-modified ligand binding site domains, and native and synthetic DbpA and DbpB proteins are disclosed, such as, for example, the use of dbpA and dbpB DNA segments as diagnostic probes and templates for protein production, and the use of proteins, fusion protein carriers and peptides in various pharmacological and immunological applications.
1.2 Description of the Related Art
1.2.1 Lyme Disease
Lyme disease (Steere, 1989), or Lyme borreliosis, is transmitted by ticks, particularly of the genus Ixodes, and caused by spirochetes of the genus Borrelia. Lyme disease agents, that is borrelias isolated from humans or animals with clinical Lyme disease, are currently classified into at least four phylogenetic groups:
B. burgdorferi
sensu stricto,
B. garinii, B. andersonii
, and
B. afzelii
. Strains potentially representing other phylogenetic groups of Lyme disease agents as well, such as group 25015, have been also isolated from ixodid ticks. Collectively these spirochetes are referred to as
B. burgdorferi
sensu lato, or simply
B. burgdorferi
. The genotypic and phenotypic variation among Lyme disease agents supporting the designation of these phylogenetic subgroupings is a major complicating factor for the design of effective vaccines or immunotherapeutic strategies for Lyme disease.
Lyme disease is transmitted through the bite of a tick which attaches itself to the host and, upon feeding, deposits the spirochetes into the dermis of the skin. In the skin,
B. burgdorferi
replicates before endovascular dissemination to organs. Typically, an annular spreading skin lesion, erythema migrans, forms from the site of the tick bite. Early symptoms of Lyme disease are flu-like and may include fatigue and lethargy. Left untreated, Lyme disease can develop into a chronic, multisystemic disorder involving the skin, joints, heart, and central nervous system.
Once deposited in the dermis, the spirochetes become associated with and appear to colonize the collagen fibers. Skin is the most consistent site of spirochete-positive culture. In persistent infection, the skin may provide a protective niche for replication, thereby acting as a reservoir of spirochetes for subsequent distribution to other tissues.
As
B. burgdorferi
disseminates to other organs, the organisms appear to localize to the extracellular spaces of these tissues as well. In several organs, including tendon (Barthold et al., 1993; 1991), ligament (Häupl et al., 1993), heart (Zimmer et al., 1990), and muscle (Barthold et al., 1992; Duray, 1992),
B. burgdorferi
spirochetes are found primarily in close association with collagen fibers, suggesting that this association is an important mechanism of tissue adherence in different stages of infection. Although the association of
B. burgdorferi
with collagen fibers has been reported previously by several investigators, the molecular mechanism responsible is not known. Lyme disease is typically treated with antibiotics, which are generally effective in the early stages of the disease. Later stages involving cardiac, arthritic, and nervous system disorders are often non-responsive.
1.2.2 Existing Vaccines for Prevention of Lyme Disease
Several proteins present on the outer surface of
B. burgdorferi
have been identified, including OspA (31 kDa), OspB (34 kDa), OspC (22 kDa), OspD, OspE, and OspF. Laboratory studies have shown that passively-administered antibodies (Schaible et al., 1990) reactive with the
B. burgdorferi
outer surface protein A (OspA), or immunization with recombinant OspA (Fikrig et al., 1990), protect mice from challenge with in vitro-grown or tick-borne
B. burgdorferi
. Based largely on the protective efficacy of experimental OspA vaccines in rodent models of Lyme borreliosis, three monovalent OspA-based vaccines are currently in clinical trials. However, recent findings suggest that broad, sustained protection of humans may be difficult to achieve with vaccines based solely on OspA.
Three observations, however, suggest that OspA-based vaccines may prove to have limited efficacy in treating Lyme disease in humans:
a) Modulation of OspA expression by
B. burgdorferi
may limit the site of action of OspA-specific antibodies to spirochetes residing in the tick midgut as these antibodies are ineffective shortly after infection;
b) Human immune responses to OspA subunit vaccines have not matched those of rodents in level or duration; and
c) OspA is serologically diverse, particularly among European and Asian
B. garinii
and
B. afzelii
isolates. Reactivity with panels of OspA monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and DNA sequence analysis has shown that as many as seven different OspA subgroups can be distinguished (Wilske et al., 1991; 1993).
Moreover, these variations will no doubt affect the cross-protection to be anticipated with OspA vaccines. Cross-protection was seen by one group using an immunocompetent mouse model (Fikrig et al., 1995), but cross-protection was weak or absent in SCID mouse or hamster models used by other (Schaible et al., 1993; Lovrich et al., 1995). An additional concern is that as many as 10% of
B. burgdorferi
isolates fail to express OspA in culture (Wilske et al., 1991; 1993).
Another problem with the use of OspA as antigens for stimulation of an immune response in an affected patient is the fact that OspA protein is either poorly immunogenic in humans, or not expressed by
B. burgdorferi
in vivo until late in infection. Lyme disease patients, mice, hamsters, and dogs infected by tick bite or low-doses of cultured
B. burgdorferi
fail to mount substantial anti-OspA immune responses for many months following infection although they do mount early responses to other
B. burgdorferi
antigens (flagellin, OspC, etc.) (Steere, 1989; Barthold and Bockenstedt, 1993). OspA is expressed by
B. burgdorferi
within ticks (Barbour et al., 1983), but detection of OspA on borrelias in tissue early after infection is difficult. Passive immunization of mice with OspA antibody (Schaible et al., 1990), or immunization with recombinant OspA, after challenge does not eliminate infection and only partially alters disease.
Unfortunately, OspA-immunized mice are not protected from a challenge with host-adapted spirochetes delivered in the form of skin biopsy transplants from infected mice (Barthold et al., 1995). The bacteria appear to express OspA in vivo only at later stages when the infection becomes disseminated. This would be explained by down-regulation of OspA expression by borrelia shortly after initiation of feeding by the tick.
de Silva et al. (1996) demonstrated that when OspA-specific antibodies were administered to mice before or at the time of attachment of borrelia-infected ticks these mice were protected from spirochetal infection. However, when OspA-specific antibody was administered 48-hr after tick attachment no protection was observed.
Modulation of borrelia antigen expression within feeding ticks has recently been reported for OspC; initially low in resting ticks, OspC levels increase on
B. burgdorferi
after initiation of tick feeding (Schwan et al., 1995). OspC might appear to be a promising in vivo target, but its high level of antigenic variation complicates its development as a vaccine (Probert and LeFebvre, 1995).
In vitro cultivation of
B. burgdorferi
suggests that the genes for OspA and OspC are inversely regulated. Preliminary findings of some researchers do suggest that OspA levels similarly decreas

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

DbpA compositions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with DbpA compositions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and DbpA compositions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2438470

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.