Vehicle fenders – Buffer or bumper type – Horizontally movable to plural operative positions other...
Reexamination Certificate
1998-11-23
2001-03-20
Pape, Joseph D. (Department: 3612)
Vehicle fenders
Buffer or bumper type
Horizontally movable to plural operative positions other...
C293S132000, C293S134000, C267S139000, C256S013100, C188S377000, C404S010000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06203079
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates in general to crash attenuators, and more particularly to medium-damped crash attenuators that use the flow of a medium such as a liquid or gas to dissipate the energy of an object such as a vehicle impacting the crash attenuator. Still more particularly, the invention relates to attenuators enabling active control of the rate of energy dissipation thereof to better control the deceleration of vehicles impacting the attenuator having widely varying kinetic energy.
The present invention also relates to method for protecting fixed structures from damage caused by the impact of objects such as vehicles, e.g., structures situated alongside highways.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many commercial products exist and numerous patents have been issued directed to the design and construction of impact attenuators or barriers to control the deceleration of an errant vehicle as it approaches an obstruction or hazard on, or adjacent to, a highway. Several prior art patents will be discussed below. This invention is concerned primarily with impact attenuators that are mounted on the rear of a construction vehicle, commonly called truck-mounted attenuators (TMA), although it is not limited thereto. The invention also has applicability to more permanent attenuator installations such as those of the type used around fixed highway structures especially where space is limited.
A review of some patents and commercial literature of TMAs illustrates a wide variety of designs which appear to have evolved by trial and error with little attempt to optimize the design to handle a wide variety of impacting vehicle kinetic energies. Thus, such existing devices generally have a fixed force versus deflection function that provides the same resisting force to the impacting vehicle regardless of that vehicle's mass or velocity.
The primary purpose of a TMA is to protect construction personnel from death or injury caused by a vehicle which mistakenly or accidentally intrudes into a construction zone. Secondarily, the TMA is designed to minimize the death and injury to the occupants of the errant vehicle. Ideally, the TMA should capture the impacting vehicle preventing it from being diverted either into adjacent traffic or off the road where it might impact a roadside structure such as a utility pole. Preferably, the TMA should even decelerate the vehicle at an acceptable level, such as 15 Gs, regardless of the mass or velocity of the impacting vehicle. Additionally, it is desirable for the TMA to be low cost, reusable after an impact, easily transported, light weight, easily shipped, easily stored, etc. No TMA on the market today satisfactorily meets all of these requirements. Therefore, there is a dire need for such a TMA that is the subject of this invention.
It is clear from the patents and commercial literature that many mechanisms exist for absorbing energy of an impacting vehicle into a TMA. These include a variety of structures that depend on the bending of metal or plastic, devices that utilize water, foam rubber, plastic etc. in a variety of energy absorption modes. Frequently, the energy dissipated by the system is part of the structure of the device. In fact, the prior art inventions have frequently confused the functions of structure and energy absorption. The instant invention therefore centers on the separation of these two functions of supporting structure and energy dissipation and optimizing these functions separately.
The basic problem to be solved by a TMA design is to capture an impacting vehicle and to decelerate it at an approximate constant value that is relatively independent of the velocity and mass of the impacting vehicle. It is also desirable for the impactor to be resetable and that it can be easily collapsed for transportation, shipping, storage etc. It is noteworthy that none of the TMAs on the market today are reusable and therefore invariably require replacement after an impact.
REVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART
U.S. Pat. No. 3,674,115 to Young et al. describes a liquid filled shock absorber comprised of many tubes each with a fixed orifice. On impact of a vehicle into the shock absorber, the fluid is forced to flow through the orifices which provides the energy dissipation. Since the orifices are fixed, the system will not adjust to vehicle impacts of varying kinetic energy to provide a constant deceleration. Also, since the device is substantially composed of such cylinders, it is heavy if used as a TMA. It is designed, therefore, for use in fixed installations.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,190,275 to Mileti describes a light weight reusable TMA which is self restoring and thus immediately available to receive an additional impact. The impact attenuator is constructed from a plurality of expanded plastic sheets sandwiched between plywood stiffeners. The expanded plastic sheets form air filled cells. The energy dissipation mechanism is not disclosed but it appears that the energy is stored as compressed gas within the cells rather than dissipated. Thus, there is a substantial force at the end of the crash to cause the impacting vehicle to change its direction and rebound at a substantial velocity off of the TMA thus substantially increasing the velocity change of the vehicle above the initial vehicle impact velocity. This increases the severity of the crash and thus the potential for injury to the construction crew and the vehicle occupants. There is no provision in this patent to adjust the force on the impacting vehicle so that substantially the same deceleration is achieved for vehicles of different kinetic energy. This has the effect of substantially increasing the length required of the device in order to handle both light and heavy impacting vehicles at high velocities. The first part of the TMA must be designed to decelerate a light, high speed vehicle at a safe level. This same force is then all that is available for the heavy vehicle which is then decelerated at a much lower level during the initial part of the crush and then at a higher level later.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,635,981 to Friton describes an attenuator including a series of chambers made from sheet metal with some of the chambers containing crushable plastic foam, which, along with the plastic deformation of the sheet metal, dissipates the kinetic energy of the impacting vehicle. The system is not reusable and does not adjust to impacting vehicles having different kinetic energies.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,674,911 to Gertz describes a crash cushion which uses the compression of air to act as a spring to provide an ever increasing force acting against the impacting vehicle. This system is reusable but does not adjust to impacting vehicles having different kinetic energies. By having the function of an ever increasing force with displacement, it is particularly inefficient in decelerating a vehicle where a constant force is desired.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,481 to Krage et al. describes an attenuator that uses the crushing or plastic deformation of sheet metal to provide the energy dissipation. This system is not reusable and does not adjust to impacting vehicles having different kinetic energies. By having the finction on an ever increasing force with displacement, it is particularly inefficient in decelerating a vehicle where a constant force is desired.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,052,732 to Oplet et al. describes an attenuator which uses a plurality of layers of fibrous hexagonal elongate cells which provides energy absorption during crushing. It suffers from the same defects at Krage et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,481).
U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,157 to Laturner describes a fixed installation vehicle crash barrier that attempts to make use of a more efficient method of deforming metal to absorb energy. It also suffers from the same limitations as Krage et al. (U.S. Pat. 4,711,481).
U.S. Pat. No. 5,199,755 to Gertz describes a TMA that also uses the bending of metal as the main energy absorption mechanism and thus has the same limitations as Krage et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,481).
U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,112 to Carn
Automotive Technologies International Inc.
Pape Joseph D.
Roffe Brian
LandOfFree
Damped crash attenuator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Damped crash attenuator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Damped crash attenuator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2475146