Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting – deodorizing – preser – Physical type apparatus – Crystallizer
Reexamination Certificate
2000-07-13
2001-11-13
Hiteshew, Felisa (Department: 1765)
Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting, deodorizing, preser
Physical type apparatus
Crystallizer
C422S250100, C422S251000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06315967
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a process for use in strengthening the finish area of a hollow blow molded container manufactured from a thermoplastic, such as a thermoplastic polyester or a biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate resin. The process described herein can readily be practiced by the apparatus disclosed and claimed in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/349,047, filed on Jul. 7, 1999.
BACKGROUND ART
A hollow blow molded thermoplastic, such as a thermoplastic polyester or a biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate resin, “PET”, container, commonly used to contain food or beverage, has excellent physical properties, durability, and a wide range of applications. However, when used in hot-fill applications, certain portions of the container which are not subjected to the biaxial orientation during the blow molding process, such as the neck area, seal edge or thread, commonly referred to as the finish area, are found to soften and deform in an undesirable manner because the temperature of the food or beverage fill is often above the glass transition temperature of the plastic. Many methodologies and processes have been tried in attempt to strengthen the finish area of such containers by enhancing the density of the resin and opacifying and whitening the finish area through crystallization of the thermoplastic resin by heat treating the finish area.
Strengthening the finish area of a thermoplastic container greatly increases the thermal stability of the finish area, improves the mechanical rigidity and increases impact resistance, wear resistance, and external pressure resistance of the container. However, a common side effect of such a thermal treatment of the finish area of the container is an undesirable deformation of the finish area, thus leading to problems with capping and sealing the container.
When crystallizing the finish area it is desirable to maintain the dimensional quality of the finish area while optimizing the crystallization rate. Such dimensional stability and the crystallization rate are each dependent upon numerous variables such as the diameter of the finish area, the material used and the energy applied to the finish area. It has also been found that a common negative effect of crystallization is the distortion of the finish area into wavy segments due to a lack of support within the finish area as the material softens during crystallization.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,084 provides a solution to the problem of deformation during heat treating by placing a cold die pin or plug into the bore of the finish prior to heating. The cold die pin assists in maintaining the proper size and shape of the finish area during the crystallization process. Others have found similar solutions. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,388,356, 4,379,099, 4,572,811, 4,590,021 and 5,261,545. The use of such cold plugs and dies however have led to problems when speed of manufacture is a priority. Inefficient heating, failure to properly position the plug and deformation of the thermoplastic container due to the weight of the plug have commonly been experienced, thereby leading to a further search for a fast, efficient way of crystallizing and maintaining the dimensional stability of the neck area of the thermoplastic container.
Thus, crystallizing processes balance two distinct criteria: the crystallization rate and the quality of the finish area. The use of a cold die plug to improve the quality of the finish area negatively affects the crystallization rate and if the plug is not used, thus improving the crystallization rate, the finish quality is negatively affected.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The crystallizing process of this invention improves upon the efforts of the prior art in many ways. The process makes use of a preheated plug which is inserted into the mouth or neck finish area of a thermoplastic preform or container, commonly known as a workpiece. While the workpiece is described herein as being a thermoplastic, it is preferable that it be a thermoplastic polyester, and even more preferable that it be polyethylene terephthalate (PET). For the purposes of this description, references will be made to PET workpieces. However, this description is not intended to be limiting on the invention described herein.
The workpiece is carried solely in an upright position by the preheated plug through the crystallizing process. The preheated plug assures even and efficient heating when crystallizing the finish area of the workpiece and constrains the shape of the finish area to a predetermined size and shape during the crystallizing process.
For the purposes of the following description of the preferred embodiment of the process, reference will be had to the following drawings and the crystallizing machine disclosed therein which practices the inventive process. However, the description of the apparatus is not intended to be limiting upon the scope of the process claims which follow.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4297306 (1981-10-01), Yoshino et al.
patent: 4375442 (1983-03-01), Ota et al.
patent: 4379099 (1983-04-01), Ota et al.
patent: 4386046 (1983-05-01), Yoshino et al.
patent: 4388356 (1983-06-01), Hrivnak et al.
patent: 4412966 (1983-11-01), Yoshino et al.
patent: 4476084 (1984-10-01), Takada et al.
patent: 4572811 (1986-02-01), Ota et al.
patent: 4587075 (1986-05-01), Butcher et al.
patent: 4589599 (1986-05-01), Hayashi et al.
patent: 4590021 (1986-05-01), Ota et al.
patent: 4591060 (1986-05-01), Tsukada et al.
patent: 4991728 (1991-02-01), Hayashi et al.
patent: 5261545 (1993-11-01), Ota et al.
patent: 5308233 (1994-05-01), Denis et al.
patent: 5540879 (1996-07-01), Orimoto et al.
patent: 5576084 (1996-11-01), Takada et al.
patent: 5645789 (1997-07-01), Rocher, Jr.
patent: 5650114 (1997-07-01), Ward et al.
patent: 5665297 (1997-09-01), Ward et al.
patent: 1182963 (1985-02-01), None
patent: 299 08 980 (1999-09-01), None
patent: 0 066 983 (1982-12-01), None
patent: 0 109 464 (1984-05-01), None
patent: 0202973 (1986-11-01), None
patent: 2 074 932 (1981-11-01), None
patent: WO99/22928 (1999-05-01), None
Boyd Timothy J.
Hatas Peter J.
McPike Brian C.
Potter Terry C.
Zhao Liguo
Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Porcello & Co., L.P.A.
Hiteshew Felisa
Schmalbach-Lubeca AG
LandOfFree
Crystallizing process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Crystallizing process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Crystallizing process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2617667