Craniotomy drape

Surgery – Body protecting or restraining devices for patients or infants – Drapes

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C128S853000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06269815

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is in the field of surgical drapes, more particularly in the field of craniotomy drapes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Draping procedures create an area of asepsis called a sterile field. All sterile items that come into contact with the prepared area about the wound must be restricted within a defined area of safety to prevent transportation of microorganisms into the open wound. The sterile field is created by placement of sterile sheets and towels, or other draping materials, in a specific position to maintain the sterility of surfaces on which sterile instruments and gloved hands may be placed. The patient and operating room table are covered with sterile drapes in a manner which exposes the prepared site of incision and isolates the area of the surgical wound. Objects draped often include instrument tables, basin and Mayo stands, trays, and some surgical equipment.
Draping materials are selected to create and maintain an effective barrier that minimizes the passage of microorganisms between non-sterile and sterile areas. To be effective, a barrier material should be resistant to blood, aqueous fluid, and abrasion, as lint-free as possible, and drapable. It should maintain an isothermic environment that is appropriate to body temperature. It should meet or exceed the requirements of the current National Fire Protection Standards, so no risk from a static charge exists.
Alexander's Care of the Patient in Surgery,
eds. M. H. Meeker, R.N., et al., 10th edition (Mosby St. Louis, Mo. 1995).
Drapes covering a surface are only considered to be sterile on the side of the drape away from the surface. The portions of the drape hanging down and away from the draped object or person are not considered sterile, since the range of human vision cannot always be counted on to notice breaks in technique and resulting contamination of the drape. p. 117, G. D. LeMaitre, M. D., et al.,
The Patient in Surgery: A Guide for Nurses,
3rd edition (W. B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia 1975).
Neurosurgical tables currently in use are normally located over and slightly above the person on whom the operation is to be performed. The table is usually prepared for the surgical procedure by the placement of one or more drapes, each for a specific purpose, in order to cover the non-sterile table and areas surrounding the head of the patient.
The anesthesiologist in a neurosurgical operation is usually seated to one side or the other of the operating table. It is desirable for the anesthesiologist to observe the face of the patient and the breathing apparatus connected to the patient to properly assess the patient's condition throughout the surgical procedure. Currently, in order to observe the face of the patient, the anesthesiologist either lifts up a corner of the drape, or attaches the drape to an intravenous bottle standpole, so that the face of the patient may be continuously observed. Obviously this presents problems of contamination, as the sterile field is compromised. Furthermore, neurosurgical operations are very long procedures, in which surgeons sit down for portions of time in wheeled chairs, or move about the head area of the patient. Current drapes trail onto the floor, creating accident hazards for operating room personnel as they walk about the table, as well compromising the sterility of the drape.
Electric cords and suction lines running along the patient to the head area are usually clamped or tied to the edges of the outer sheet on the table. These cords or lines can become tangled, and when pulled may cause devices to fall to the floor and become unsterile. This represents a risk to the patient while under a general anesthesia for the period of time required for the preparation of new sterile devices. Furthermore, the clamps and ties are usually not versatile or strong enough to allow easy addition or removal of tubes and electrical lines. This results in delay in surgery while operating room personnel undo and re-affix clamps.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a drape where the face of the patient may be observed directly by the anesthesiologist without compromising the sterile field.
It is another object of the invention to provide a drape which does not trail on the floor of the operating room.
It is a further object of the invention to provide clamps on a drape which are strong and easily adjusted.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a fenestrated craniotomy drape including a main sheet, translucent anesthesia side screens, a gusset forming the corners of the anterior edges of the drape, a run-off collection pouch whose back side is pressed flat and affixed to the drape, with a back side fenestration surrounding the fenestration of the main sheet, and a front side fenestration, and adjustable tube holders. The drape optionally includes a layer of a fenestrated absorbent material between the drape and the pouch, a solids screen and drain port in the pouch, and a ductile material about the edges of the front side fenestration of the pouch that holds the pouch open. The back-side fenestration of the pouch and those of the drape and the absorbent material are covered by an incise sheet, located between the back side of the pouch and the drape. The adhesive side of the incise sheet facing the patient is covered by a releasable backing.


REFERENCES:
patent: Re. 34512 (1994-01-01), Dowdy et al.
patent: D. 334457 (1993-03-01), Becker
patent: 3575407 (1971-04-01), Carson
patent: 3650267 (1972-03-01), Anderson
patent: 3667458 (1972-06-01), Krebs
patent: 3799161 (1974-03-01), Collins
patent: 3856006 (1974-12-01), Krzewinski
patent: 3911912 (1975-10-01), Krebs et al.
patent: 3923052 (1975-12-01), Zoephel
patent: 3952738 (1976-04-01), Krzewinski
patent: 3955569 (1976-05-01), Krzewinski et al.
patent: 4007741 (1977-02-01), Waldrop et al.
patent: 4036235 (1977-07-01), Hathaway
patent: 4041203 (1977-08-01), Brock et al.
patent: 4089331 (1978-05-01), Hartigan et al.
patent: 4105019 (1978-08-01), Haswell
patent: 4201212 (1980-05-01), Bradley
patent: 4378794 (1983-04-01), Collins
patent: 4384573 (1983-05-01), Elliott
patent: 4414968 (1983-11-01), Amin
patent: 4457026 (1984-07-01), Morris
patent: 4462396 (1984-07-01), Wichman
patent: 4465066 (1984-08-01), Carpel
patent: 4553538 (1985-11-01), Rafelson
patent: 4559937 (1985-12-01), Vinson
patent: 4569341 (1986-02-01), Morris
patent: 4570628 (1986-02-01), Neal
patent: 4586498 (1986-05-01), Morris
patent: 4596245 (1986-06-01), Morris
patent: 4598458 (1986-07-01), McAllester
patent: 4616642 (1986-10-01), Martin et al.
patent: 4699131 (1987-10-01), Crook et al.
patent: 4730609 (1988-03-01), McConnell
patent: 4745915 (1988-05-01), Enright et al.
patent: 4869271 (1989-09-01), Idris
patent: 4873997 (1989-10-01), Marshall
patent: 4889135 (1989-12-01), Poettgen
patent: 4890628 (1990-01-01), Jackson
patent: 4945924 (1990-08-01), Poettgen
patent: 4966168 (1990-10-01), Glassman
patent: 5002069 (1991-03-01), Thompson et al.
patent: 5038798 (1991-08-01), Dowdy et al.
patent: 5042507 (1991-08-01), Dowdy
patent: 5107859 (1992-04-01), Alcorn et al.
patent: 5127423 (1992-07-01), Draeger
patent: 5140997 (1992-08-01), Glassman
patent: 5143091 (1992-09-01), Pathode
patent: 5161544 (1992-11-01), Morris
patent: 5197493 (1993-03-01), Grier-Idris
patent: 5209243 (1993-05-01), Glassman
patent: 5213114 (1993-05-01), Bailey, Jr.
patent: 5222507 (1993-06-01), Taylor
patent: 5322071 (1994-06-01), Ambrose
patent: 5345946 (1994-09-01), Butterworth et al.
patent: 5349965 (1994-09-01), McCarver
patent: 5361780 (1994-11-01), Kellan
patent: 5361781 (1994-11-01), Antonini
patent: 5394891 (1995-03-01), Mills et al.
patent: 5398700 (1995-03-01), Mills et al.
patent: 5413118 (1995-05-01), Thompson
patent: 5419343 (1995-05-01), Taylor
patent: 5445165 (1995-03-01), Fenwick
patent: 5452729 (1995-09-01), Bergsbaken et al.
patent: 5464024 (1995-11-01), Mills et al.
patent: 5503163 (1996-04-01), Boyd
patent: 5540979 (1996-07-01), Yahiaoui
patent: 5709221 (1998-01-01), Vancaille et al.
patent: 5778889 (1

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Craniotomy drape does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Craniotomy drape, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Craniotomy drape will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2497123

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.