Traversing hoists – Having means to prevent or dampen load oscillations – Antisway
Patent
1998-07-08
2000-10-03
Brahan, Thomas J.
Traversing hoists
Having means to prevent or dampen load oscillations
Antisway
212323, 294 814, B66C 1720
Patent
active
061260231
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a crane which is arranged through its reeving system to manoeuvre a load.
The invention has been developed in the context of a gantry crane for use in handling shipping containers and the invention will hereinafter be described below in such context. However, it will be understood that the invention does have broader application, to other crane types which are required to exercise stable control over position and orientation of suspended loads.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Special purpose container handling cranes are used in modern cargo handling facilities to load and off-load ships, and the speed with which ships may be serviced by such cranes is a key determining factor in the overall efficiency of a port. Current gantry cranes use a head block to grapple a container by way of a spreader. The head block is suspended from a rail mounted gantry trolley through an arrangement of reeving cables used to raise and lower the head block.
The cycle times of gantry cranes are limited by two main factors. Firstly, containers may not always be aligned in such a way as to allow easy positioning of the spreader on top of a container that is to be lifted. Thus, the speed with which the spreader may accurately be positioned by the crane is of considerable importance. Typically, this positioning may take up to 50% of the duty cycle of the crane, the remainder being taken up by travel between ship and shore. Secondly, the head block and load suspended from the reeving, at heights sometimes up to 50 m, have the tendency to sway or swing during motion of the crane and during hoisting operations. These factors can reduce so-called box rates and, hence, port efficiency by about 50%. Considering that a typical container ship may require up to 1,000 container movements, potential benefits of improving crane efficiency are substantial.
Reducing the sway of the crane hoist and making the reeving more controllable will result in reduced positioning times and improved ship service times. A reduction in positioning time of the order of 10-20% would have a substantial impact on the cargo handling business.
Shipyard and quay-side cranes that currently are employed are stable only in the vertical, z-direction. Loads carried by such cranes may be caused to rotate and sway under lateral forces.
Industrial practice currently employed to improve the operating efficiency of such cranes relies on using the skill of the crane driver to avoid load sway and on the use of complex anti-sway systems. Such systems usually employ complex reeving arrangements and active control systems for hoist motors.
Two such active sway suppression systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,916,162 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,350,254. The former system tends to suppress the pendulum motion in the horizontal direction but fails to suppress any pitch, roll or yaw of the load. The latter system employs additional wires and winches.
A number of studies have been conducted toward achieving more effective reeving arrangements.
One such study has been published by N. G. Dagalakis et al in an article entitled "Stiffness Study of a Parallel Link Robot Crane for Ship Building Applications", Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, August 1989, Volume lll, pages 183-193. A further study has been published by James Albus et al under the title "The NIST robot crane", Journal of Robotic Systems, 10(5), 1993,pages 709-724.
Both of these studies disclose cranes having improved hoist and reeving arrangements incorporating the concept of an inverted Stewart Platform of the type commonly used in aircraft simulators. In the cranes by Albus and Dagalakis, the parallel links between the base and the supported load of a Stewart platform are replaced by the reeving cables of the crane, and winches are used as the actuators.
The hoist and reeving designs proposed by Dagalakis and Albus involve the provision of connection points for the reeving on a lower load platform at the vertices of an equilateral triangle. In a simil
REFERENCES:
patent: 2916162 (1959-12-01), Gercke
patent: 3081884 (1963-03-01), Minty
patent: 3276602 (1966-10-01), Vogeley et al.
patent: 3309966 (1967-03-01), Fawell
patent: 3476263 (1969-11-01), Komatsu et al.
patent: 3532324 (1970-10-01), Crittenden
patent: 3567040 (1971-03-01), Thomson
patent: 3842986 (1974-10-01), Hupkes
patent: 3874516 (1975-04-01), Watanabe
patent: 3945503 (1976-03-01), Cooper
patent: 4350254 (1982-09-01), Noly
patent: 4905848 (1990-03-01), Skjonberg
patent: 5257891 (1993-11-01), Baumann et al.
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Stiffness Study of a Parallel Link Robot Crane for Shipbuilding Appliances, N.G. Dagalakis et al., Aug. 1989, vol. 111, pp. 183-193.
Journal of Robotic Systems, The Nist Robocrane, James Albus, et al., 10(5), 709-724 (1993).
Dissanayke Gamini
Durrant-Whyte Hugh
Rye David C.
Brahan Thomas J.
Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty. Limited
The University of Sydney
LandOfFree
Crane with improved reeving arrangement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Crane with improved reeving arrangement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Crane with improved reeving arrangement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-186951