Agitating – Mortar mixer type – With heating or drying
Reexamination Certificate
2001-01-18
2004-01-06
Cooley, Charles E. (Department: 1723)
Agitating
Mortar mixer type
With heating or drying
C366S058000, C034S137000, C432S111000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06672751
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a counter-flow asphalt plant used to produce a variety of asphalt compositions. More specifically, this invention relates to a counter-flow asphalt plant having a recycle asphalt (RAP) feed to the combustion zone to produce high percentage RAP mixes without generating excessive blue smoke and having an exhaust gas heater to improve production rates with greater economy and efficiency of plant design and operation.
Several techniques and numerous equipment arrangements for the preparation of asphaltic cement, also referred by the trade as “hotmix” or “HMA” are known from the prior art. Particularly relevant to the present invention is the continuous production of asphalt compositions in a drum mixer asphalt plant. Typically, water-laden virgin aggregates are dried and heated within a rotating, open-ended drum mixer through radiant, convective and conductive heat transfer from a stream of hot gases produced by a burner flame. As the heated virgin aggregate flows through the drum mixer, it is combined with liquid asphalt and mineral binder to produce an asphaltic composition as the desired end-product. Optionally, prior to mixing the virgin aggregate and liquid asphalt, reclaimed or recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) may be added once it is crushed up or ground to a suitable size. The RAP is typically mixed with the heated virgin aggregate in the drum mixer at a point prior to adding the liquid asphalt and mineral fines.
The asphalt industry has traditionally faced many environmental challenges. The drum mixer characteristically generates, as by-products, a gaseous hydrocarbon emission (known as blue smoke), various nitrogen oxides (NO
x
) and sticky dust particles covered with asphalt. Early asphalt plants exposed the liquid asphalt or RAP material to excessive temperatures within the drum mixer or put the materials in close proximity with the burner flame which caused serious product degradation. Health and safety hazards resulted from the substantial air pollution control problems due to the blue-smoke produced when hydrocarbon constituents in the asphalt are driven off and released into the atmosphere. The exhaust gases of the asphalt plant are fed to air pollution control equipment, typically a baghouse. Within the baghouse, the blue-smoke condenses on the filter bags and the asphalt-covered dust particles stick to and plug-up the filter bags, thereby presenting a serious fire hazard and reducing filter efficiency and useful life. Significant investments and efforts were previously made by the industry in attempting to control blue-smoke emissions attributed to hydrocarbon volatile gases and particulates from both the liquid asphalt and recycle material.
The earlier environmental problems were further exacerbated by the processing technique standard in the industry which required the asphalt ingredients with the drum mixer to flow in the same direction (i.e., co-current flow) as the hot gases for heating and drying the aggregate. Thus, the asphalt component of recycle material and liquid asphalt itself came in direct contact with the hot gas stream and, in some instances, even the burner flame itself
Many of the earlier problems experienced by asphalt plants were solved with the development of modern day counter-flow technology as disclosed in my earlier patent Hawkins U.S. Pat. No. 4,787,938 which is incorporated herein by reference and which was first commercially introduced by Standard Havens, Inc. in 1986. The asphalt industry began to standardize on the counter-flow processing technique in which the ingredients of the asphaltic composition and the hot gas stream flow through a single, rotating drum mixer in opposite directions. Combustion equipment extends into the drum mixer to generate the hot gas stream at an intermediate point within the drum mixer. Accordingly, the drum mixer includes three zones. From the end of the drum where the virgin aggregate feeds, the three zones include a drying/heating zone to dry and heat virgin aggregate, a combustion zone to generate a hot gas stream for the drying/heating zone, and a mixing zone to mix hot aggregate, recycle material and liquid asphalt to produce an asphaltic composition for discharge from the lower end of the drum mixer.
Not only did the counter-flow process with its three zones vastly improve heat transfer characteristics, more importantly it provided a process in which the liquid asphalt and recycle material were isolated from the burner flame and the hot gas stream generated by the combustion equipment. Counter-flow operation represented a solution to the vexing problem of blue-smoke and all the health and safety hazards associated with blue-smoke.
A more complete understanding of the early equipment and processing techniques used by the asphalt industry can be found in the extensive listing of prior art patents and printed publications contained in my earlier patents Hawkins U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,182 issued Nov. 15, 1994, Hawkins U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,470,146 issued Nov. 28, 1995, and Hawkins 5,664,881 issued Sep. 9, 1997. Indeed, as a result of my first patent Hawkins 4,787,938 becoming involved in protracted litigation, the prior art collection cited in the foregoing patents is thought to be a thorough and exhaustive bibliographic listing of asphalt technology and such prior art is specifically incorporated herein by reference.
With many of the health and safety issues associated with asphalt production solved by the advent of counter-flow technology, contemporaneous attention has now shifted to operational inefficiencies which are manifest as excessive design and production costs and poor economy of operation from excess energy consumption.
Experience has shown that the environmentally desirable use of a recycled material (RAP) in asphalt production comes with disadvantageous tradeoffs in energy consumption. The most energy efficient plant operation is achieved when no RAP is added. In such circumstances, for example, all virgin aggregate is introduced in one end of the dryer and flows as a falling curtain or veil of material in counter-current heat exchange with hot gases generated at the opposite end of the dryer. The shell temperature is characteristically about 500° F. and the exhaust gas is about 225° F. which is within the normal operating temperature for the baghouse used to filter the exhaust gas of particulate matter. The temperature of the exhaust gas stream is determined by the design of the dryer, but must be kept above dew pont to prevent moisture from condensing in the exhaust ductwork and especially in the baghouse itself. A temperature of 225° F. is sufficient, but since varying conditions during operation can cause relatively large temperature swings, most operations are controlled to keep exhaust temperatures in the range of 250° F. to 275° F.
The addition of RAP material has a significant effect on operating temperatures of the process. Since RAP cannot be directly dried without burning the liquid asphalt and causing hydrocarbon smoke emissions, it is dried indirectly by superheating the virgin aggregates and then mixing the superheated aggregates with the RAP to achieve a mixed mixture temperature. This results in much higher exhaust gas temperatures and a resulting loss in fuel efficiency. Accordingly, 20 TO 40% RAP feeds (that is, operations wherein RAP makes up 20 to 40% of the final asphalt composition) have been close to the upper end of the range heretofore workable in modem counter-flow asphalt plants. Although a 50% RAP feed has been achievable, it has been at the cost of high energy and reduced equipment life. Consequently, an upper limit of approximately 40% RAP has been a realistic upper limit for the majority of asphalt plants. The operating conditions necessary are illustrative of the problems. If 50% RAP is introduced midstream in the process, then only 50% virgin aggregates are used. This means that only half the material is present, as compared to the 100% virgin aggregate production, to be heated and only half the veiling of mate
Cooley Charles E.
Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
Sorkin David
LandOfFree
Counter-flow asphalt plant with combustion zone feed and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Counter-flow asphalt plant with combustion zone feed and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Counter-flow asphalt plant with combustion zone feed and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3240889