Aeronautics and astronautics – Aircraft structure – Passenger or crew accommodation
Patent
1991-05-10
1993-01-19
Barefoot, Galen
Aeronautics and astronautics
Aircraft structure
Passenger or crew accommodation
244122R, 297232, B64D 1106
Patent
active
051801205
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to seating and in particular to seating for use in aircraft.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The airline business today is divided mainly into two catagories of carrier, namely the schedule carriers and charter operators.
Schedule carriers cater for three classes of passenger namely first class, business class and economy class and normally all three together in one aircraft or an alternative mixture of first class and economy class or business and economy class. In contrast charter operators offer single class accommodation and nothing else.
The present invention is concerned mainly with scheduled service operation and the problems of flexibility of use as between the differing class sections of the aircraft. However the invention is not limited thereto and may be applicable to seating used by any category of airline carrier.
In order to maximize profitability the scheduled airline operators arrange the seating in the aircraft cabin based on predicted load factors as between first, business and economy class passengers. The most important of these classes, as far as profitability is concerned, is business class.
Indeed, business class accommodation is recognized by all major carriers as the highest profit earner since it attracts the full fare and is used by those who travel more frequently than others. Hence when planning seating configuration for scheduled operation, airlines seek to maximize the potential for carrying business class passengers. Problems arise however due to the variability of demand. For example, on international flights high demand for business class seats occurs at the start and the end of the working week, with very little intermediate demand. Again low demand for business class seats is encountered during holiday periods, when the demand for economy seats is high.
Moreover, demand for the better class seats varies with route, so that on the New York to London run for example, it is very high, whereas the opposite applies for example on the London to Bombay route.
Although conceivably it would be possible to solve the problem by dedicating aircraft having a particular seating arrangement according to demand on any particular route, logistically this is unworkable.
An alternative possibility would be to increase the business class section of an aircraft to cater for a high demand period on a particular route. However logistics will determine that the same aircraft would have to be used on the same route when the demand for business class seats is low so that a considerable number of seats would remain unfilled with consequent loss of profitability.
The solution adopted by a number of airlines is to provide a medium sized business class section together with the installation of a movable divider. Thus the divider may be deployed when there is a low demand for business class such that some of the business class seats are joined to the economy class section, therefore to be used by passengers travelling on economy fares, which are normally less than half the fare of a business class passenger.
This is clearly unfair and leads to consumer ill feeling. This will be clearly apparent when a comparison is made between the facilities provided in a business class section and an economy section in two main types of aircraft, the B747 and DC10, as follows:
______________________________________ Aircraft Type Economy Business
______________________________________
B747 10 passengers
6/7 passengers
across across
3-4-3 2-2-2 2-3-2
32" of space 38" of space
DC10 9 passengers 7 passengers
across across
3-3-3 2-3-2
32" of space 38" of space
______________________________________
A further disadvantage as regards profitability is the fact that business class passengers tend to migrate into the section aft of the divider because experience tells them that these seats are of the same quality as in the business class section itself. This reduces revenue.
To compensate for these problems there have been a number of convertible sea
REFERENCES:
patent: 3145052 (1964-08-01), Morgan
patent: 3638997 (1972-02-01), Shapiro
patent: 3743351 (1973-07-01), Harris
patent: 3893729 (1975-07-01), Sherman
patent: 4533175 (1985-08-01), Brennan
patent: 4881702 (1989-11-01), Slettebak
Bayliss Brian S.
Simpson Leslie J.
Barefoot Galen
Ellis Christopher P.
Price, Jr,. Stanley J.
LandOfFree
Convertible aircraft seat does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Convertible aircraft seat, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Convertible aircraft seat will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-98773