Incremental printing of symbolic information – Ink jet – Ejector mechanism
Reexamination Certificate
1998-06-18
2001-04-17
Barlow, John (Department: 2853)
Incremental printing of symbolic information
Ink jet
Ejector mechanism
Reexamination Certificate
active
06217151
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to acoustic ink printing (AIP) and more particularly to improved print head transducers, for increasing printing uniformity.
AIP is a method for transferring ink directly to a recording medium having several advantages over other direct printing methodologies. One important advantage is, that it does not need nozzles and ejection orifices that have caused many of the reliability (e.g., clogging) and picture element (i.e., “pixel”) placement accuracy problems which conventional drop-on-demand and continuous-stream ink jet printers have experienced. Since AIP avoids the clogging and manufacturing problems associated with drop-on-demand, nozzle-based ink jet printing, it represents a promising direct marking technology. While more detailed descriptions of the AIP process can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,308,547, 4,697,195, and 5,028,937, essentially, bursts of focused acoustic energy emit droplets from the free surface of a liquid onto a recording medium. By controlling the emitting process as the recording medium moves relative to droplet emission sites, a predetermined image is formed.
To be competitive with other printer types, acoustic ink printers must produce high quality images at low cost. To meet such requirements it is advantageous to fabricate print heads with a large number of individual droplet emitters using techniques similar to those used in semiconductor fabrication. While specific AIP implementations may vary, and while additional components may be used, each droplet emitter will include an ultrasonic transducer (attached to one surface of a body), a varactor for switching the droplet emitter on and off, an acoustic lens (at the opposite side of the body), and a cavity holding ink such that the ink's free surface is near the acoustic focal area of the acoustic lens. The individual droplet emitter is possible by selection of its associated row and column.
As may be appreciated, acoustic ink printing is subject to a number of manufacturing variables, including transducer piezo-electric material thickness, stress and composition variation; transducer loading effects due to wire bond attachment to the top electrode and top electrode thickness; ink channel gap control impacting acoustic wave focal point variations; aperture hole variations causing the improper pinning of the ink meniscus; RF distribution non-uniformity along the row electrodes, electromagnetic reflections on the transmission lines, variations in acoustic coupling efficiencies, and variations in the components associated with each transducer. Because of manufacturing constraints, these variables cannot be sufficiently controlled. The variables can result in non-uniform print profiles such as print head end-to-end non-uniformity printing. One type of non-uniform printing is a fixed pattern “frown” effect, wherein the intensity of ink in a middle portion of a print area is greater than at the outer edges of the print area.
A typical “frown” effect is illustrated by test print pattern A of FIG.
1
. The “frown” results from non-uniform droplets, i.e., droplets that vary in size, emission velocity, emission frequency and/or other characteristics. In addition to the “frown” effect, other non-uniform printing which can occur include a “smile” effect, which exists when there is non-uniformity in printing in a direction orthogonal to the length of the print head. Non-uniform droplet ejection velocity can produce misaligned droplets. Non-uniform droplets may degrade the final image so much that the image becomes unacceptable. Therefore, a need exists to improve droplet uniformity in acoustic ink printing, for the “frown” and “smile” effects, as well as other non-uniformity patterns.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, described are techniques and devices for improving end-to-end, top-to-bottom, and other types of AIP print uniformity.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, there is provided an improved print head having transducers with upper electrodes of differing areas, and a method for producing the transducers.
An acoustic ink printer print head in accordance with the present invention includes an array of transducers reshaped in accordance with area ratios which allow for end-to-end and top-to-bottom uniform printing. An upper electrode layer of the transducer has selected areas removed such that at least some of the transducers have different area ratios than others in the same row and/or column layer.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the upper electrodes having at least some of their area removed are in the form of one of a “donut” and “dot ” configuration.
With attention to another aspect of the present invention, in addition to the normal print head process and assembly, after an initial print test and/or threshold of ejection measurements from end-to-end and/or top-to-bottom of the print head are undertaken and determined, a transducer threshold of ejection end-to-end, top-to-bottom or other profile is captured. A first step of correction in one embodiment uses laser trimming to detune transducers near the center columns, such transducers having been determined to be more efficient than those not as close to the center columns. By the selective laser trimming of a top electrode area, selected ones of the transducer's print efficiency are reduced.
Subsequent print testing, after laser trimming, is used to confirm print uniformity improvement. When the transducer detuning profile is established across representative print heads, the second step is to encode the area and shape changes that are necessary for a first order correction. This information is encoded into an electrode process mask. A third step of correction is further refining the first step after incorporation of the first order correction in the row and/or column electrode mask.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4308547 (1981-12-01), Lovelady et al.
patent: 4460841 (1984-07-01), Smith et al.
patent: 4520374 (1985-05-01), Koto
patent: 4678889 (1987-07-01), Yamanaka
patent: 4697195 (1987-09-01), Quate et al.
patent: 4719480 (1988-01-01), Elrod et al.
patent: 4772774 (1988-09-01), Legeune et al.
patent: 4959674 (1990-09-01), Khri-Yakub et al.
patent: 5028937 (1991-07-01), Khuri-Yakub et al.
patent: 5096850 (1992-03-01), Lippitt, III
patent: 5284794 (1994-02-01), Isobe et al.
patent: 5345361 (1994-09-01), Billotte et al.
patent: 5374590 (1994-12-01), Batorf et al.
patent: 5389956 (1995-02-01), Hadimioglu et al.
patent: 5530465 (1996-06-01), Haseqawa et al.
patent: 5565113 (1996-10-01), Hadimioglu et al.
patent: 5569398 (1996-10-01), Sun et al.
patent: 0 692 383 A2 (1996-01-01), None
patent: 0 835 756 A2 (1998-04-01), None
patent: 61-118261 (1986-05-01), None
patent: 07246703 (1995-09-01), None
Barlow John
Brooke Michael S.
Fay Sharpe Fagan Minnich & McKee LLP
Xerox Corporation
LandOfFree
Controlling AIP print uniformity by adjusting row electrode... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Controlling AIP print uniformity by adjusting row electrode..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controlling AIP print uniformity by adjusting row electrode... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2463518