Electricity: electrical systems and devices – Control circuits for electromagnetic devices – Systems for magnetizing – demagnetizing – or controlling the...
Reexamination Certificate
2002-01-08
2004-01-06
Dinkins, Anthony (Department: 2831)
Electricity: electrical systems and devices
Control circuits for electromagnetic devices
Systems for magnetizing, demagnetizing, or controlling the...
C361S170000, C361S187000, C361S152000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06674629
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a controller for controlling an actuator for a magnetic valve, and more specifically to a controller for an electromagnetic actuator for driving a valve of an engine mounted on such apparatus as an automobile and a boat.
Valve driving mechanism having an electromagnetic actuator has been known and called a magnetic valve. An electromagnetic actuator typically includes a moving iron or an armature which is placed between a pair of springs with given off-set load so that the armature positions at an intermediate part of a pair of electromagnets. A valve is connected to the armature. When electric power is supplied to the pair of electromagnets alternately, the armature is driven reciprocally in two opposite directions thereby driving the valve. Conventionally, the driving manner is as follows.
1) The magnetic attraction power that one of the electromagnets provides to the armature overcomes rebound power by the pair of springs and attracts the armature to make it seat on a seating position. The armature (valve) is released from the seating position by such a trigger as suspension of power supply to the electromagnet, and starts to displace in a cosine function manner by the force of the pair of springs.
2) At a timing according to the displacement of the armature, an appropriate current is supplied to the other electromagnet to produce magnetic flux which generates attraction force.
3) The magnetic flux rapidly grows as the armature approaches the other electromagnet that is producing the magnetic flux. The work by the attraction power generated by the other electromagnet overcomes the sum of (i) a small work by the residual magnetic flux produced by the one electromagnet which acts on the armature to pull it back and (ii) a mechanical loss which accounts for a large portion of the sum of work. Thus, the armature is attracted and seats on the other electromagnet.
4) At an appropriate timing as the armature seats, a constant current is supplied to the other electromagnet to hold the armature in the seated state.
In maintaining the armature in the seated state, it is desirable to supply the minimum driving current that can hold the armature in the seated state so as to minimize power consumption. However, when a minimum current is used every time the armature is to be held in the seated state, the armature moved to a seating position may from time to time leave the seating position due to secular changes of the electromagnetic actuator and/or variations of the movement. When the armature falls or lifts (collectively referred to as “leave”) from the seating position, such situation needs to be detected immediately and power supply needs to be boosted to pull the armature back to the seating position.
Conventionally, leaving of the armature was detected based on signals from a displacement sensor that detects displacement of the armature. Specifically, leaving (falling or lifting) of the armature is determined by detecting a situation that the sensor output does not indicate seated state of the armature in the period that the armature is in the seated state. In response to determination of leaving of the armature, a large current is supplied to the windings of the electromagnet to activate pullback operation immediately so that the armature may be pulled back to the seating position.
However, the conventional method includes the following problems. The air gap between the armature and the yoke of the electromagnet is very small when the armature is seated. The electromagnetic actuator has a very small magnetic reluctance when the armature is seated. When a constant current is supplied for holding the armature in the seated state, if the armature leaves the seating position by a small distance for some reasons, say less than 10 &mgr;m from the seating position, the attraction force decreases. It is very difficult to detect such a small movement with the displacement sensor. For example, when the armature moves in the range of 7 mm in order to open and close a valve of an automobile engine, the displacement sensor can only detect the movement of the armature which is larger than {fraction (1/100)} of the moving range. That is, the sensor can only detect armature movement larger than 70 &mgr;m due to noise and performance of the sensor. Leaving (falling or lifting) detection at 70 &mgr;m point is too late to ensure pullback operation of the armature.
In addition, when pullback operation is activated at 70 &mgr;m point, a larger current needs to be supplied, thereby increasing power consumption. This requires to increase the capacity of a driver element such as a field effect transistor, raising the cost of the driving circuit. Furthermore, a large current and the air gap produced by the leaving armature cause a large magnetic energy to be accumulated in the air gap. This magnetic energy is converted into kinetic energy of the armature and valve when the armature is attracted again to the seating position. As a result, seating speed of the armature becomes large producing a large collision sound when the armature seats.
As a specific example, a case for repetitively activating an electromagnetic actuator at a high speed as in the case of a valve train of an engine is described referring to FIG.
15
. The left vertical axis shows the magnitude of displacement of the armature (mm) and current (A) supplied to the electromagnet. The right vertical axis shows attraction power (N) and voltage (V) applied to the electromagnet. As shown in the figures, the minimum attraction power (falling limit or leaving limit) that prevents the armature from leaving from the seating position is 485 N.
FIG.
15
(
a
) shows a case in which the armature seats normally and a stable seated state is maintained. At time 0, the armature is released from one electromagnet and starts to move toward the other electromagnet by the operation of a pair of springs. During the period from time Te to Th, a constant voltage 42V is applied to the other electromagnet (over-excitation operation) to make the armature seat on the other electromagnet. After that, since the attraction force is a little larger than the leaving limit, a stable seated state is maintained. After the armature is seated, switching control of voltages 0 and +12V is performed to supply a constant holding current to the electromagnet.
FIG.
15
(
b
) shows a case where a seated armature leaves the seating position. A displacement sensor detects the leaving movement of the armature when the armature reaches 70 &mgr;m point, which is 1% of the lift (movement) range of 7 mm. A pullback operation is immediately initiated. The armature reaches 70 &mgr;m point around time 6.33 ms. For 0.5 ms from time 6.33 ms, over-excitation voltage is applied. The voltage application period is determined according to the leaving extent (70 &mgr;m).
After voltage application finished, a holding current value is renewed to a value which is larger than the preset normal holding current value by a predetermined value (for example, the predetermined value is 10% of the normal holding current value). Switching control of voltages of ±12V is carried out until the current converges into the renewed target holding current value. In the example shown in the figure, the switching control is carried out for 0.7 ms. Thereafter, switching control of voltages of +12V and 0V is performed so that current supplied to the electromagnet maintains the target holding current value.
In the example shown in FIG.
15
(
b
), the armature leaves the seating position about 0.22 mm and is pulled back. The energy needed for the pullback is about 0.12 J. The seating speed (not shown) of the armature at pullback is approximately 0.6 m/s, which generates collision noise. Thus, activating pullback operation responsive to detection of the leaving armature by the displacement sensor causes delay in the pullback operation and requires a large energy for pullback. It produces a large seating speed leading to collision noise.
Thus, there is a need
Abe Kenji
Kouno Yoshitomo
Nakamura Minoru
Ozawa Hidetaka
Dinkins Anthony
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Lahive & Cockfield LLP
LandOfFree
Controller for controlling an electromagnetic actuator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Controller for controlling an electromagnetic actuator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controller for controlling an electromagnetic actuator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3237791