Controller for a quick disconnect slide assembly

Supports: cabinet structure – With movable components – Horizontally movable

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C312S334440

Reexamination Certificate

active

10996300

ABSTRACT:
A slide assembly includes an inner slide segment, an intermediate slide segment, and an outer slide segment. A bearing assembly is provided between the inner slide segment and the intermediate slide segment. Preferably, a lock arm extends from the outer slide segment and is engageable with an engagement surface of the intermediate slide segment to limit movement of the intermediate slide segment with respect to the outer slide segment. A latch is associated with the intermediate slide segment and comprises a locking portion. The locking portion is selectively engageable with the bearing assembly to limit movement of the bearing assembly.

REFERENCES:
patent: 2277702 (1942-03-01), Kennedy
patent: 3129981 (1964-04-01), Meyer
patent: 3650578 (1972-03-01), Del Vecchio et al.
patent: 3801166 (1974-04-01), York
patent: 3904254 (1975-09-01), Hagen et al.
patent: 4200342 (1980-04-01), Fall
patent: 4560212 (1985-12-01), Papp et al.
patent: 4998828 (1991-03-01), Hobbs
patent: 5472272 (1995-12-01), Hoffman
patent: 5722750 (1998-03-01), Chu
patent: 5757109 (1998-05-01), Parvin
patent: 5851059 (1998-12-01), Cirocco
patent: 5871265 (1999-02-01), Stewart et al.
patent: 6145945 (2000-11-01), Parvin
patent: 6199967 (2001-03-01), Bayles et al.
patent: 6254210 (2001-07-01), Parvin
patent: 6296338 (2001-10-01), Stijns
patent: 2707365 (1978-08-01), None
patent: 22 17 853 (1979-10-01), None
patent: 583978 (1994-02-01), None
Civil Docket for US District Court, Central District of California for Case No. SACV04-1365 DOC (SHx), as of Aug. 10, 2005.
US District Court, Central District of California, Jonathan Mfg. Corp.'s Complaint for Patent Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,820,954, filed Nov. 23, 2004.
US District Court, Central District of California, Central Industrial Supply Co.'s Answer To Complaint, filed Dec. 14, 2004.
US District Court, Central District of California, King Slide Works Co.'s Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, filed Apr. 18, 2005.
US District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Chun-Chiang Wang In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, filed Apr. 18, 2005.
US District Court, Central District of California, Hewlett-Packard Co.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Preliminary Injunction Order, filed Apr. 18, 2005.
US District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Kelly Smith in support of Hewlett-Packard Co.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Preliminary Injunction Order, filed Apr. 18, 2005.
Notebook pages of Craig Lauchner, Engineer for Hewlett-Packard, p. 31-32.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Clark W. Higgins in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of David R. Yost, Jr. in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, Jan. 13, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Jan. 28, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, Feb. 7, 2005.
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, Mar. 21, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Clark W. Higgins in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, Mar. 21, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Order Granting a Preliminary Injunction, Mar. 28, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Expert Report of Scott Meek Submitted by Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation, Apr. 13, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Designation of Scott Meek as a Rebuttal Expert Witness; and Preliminary Rebuttal Expert Report of Scott Meek Submitted by Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation, May 27, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, (Consolidated )(Lead Case) King Slide Works Co., Ltd.'s Non-Infringement Charts for Claims 10-23 of U.S. Patent No. 6,820,954, Aug. 10, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Lowell Anderson re: Defendant Central Industrial Supply Company's Brief on Claim Construction for the 954 Patent and Memorandum for Invalidity under 112, filed by Defendant Central Industrial Supply Company, (twdb,) (Entered: Sep. 23, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Jonathan Manufacturing Corp.'sMarkmanBrief: Sep. 23, 2005.
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Jonathan's Opposition to CIS' Motion for Summary Judgment [111], and Motion for Summary Judgment of infringement of claims [109] filed by plaintiff Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation (twdb,) (Entered: Sep. 28, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of James C. Brooks in support of Jonathan's Motion for Contempt, In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss claims on the QS1 and in opposition to defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [111] filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation (twdb,)(Entered: Sep. 28, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Gaetano G. Galletti in Support of Jonathan's opposition to CIS' Motion for Summary Judgment [109] filed by plaintiff Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation (twdb,) (Entered: Sep. 28, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Opposition to Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation's Markman Brief [113] filed by Defendant Central Industrial Supply Company (twdb,) (Entered: Sep. 28, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claims of U.S. Patents 6,820,954 under 35 USC 112 [111] filed by plaintiff Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation (mu,) (Entered: Sep. 29, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Markman Reply Brief filed by Plaintiff Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation (twdb,) (Entered: Oct. 5, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Reply re Motion for Summary Judgment on the QS1 [109] filed by Defendant Central Industrial Supply Company (twdb,) (Entered: Oct. 5, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Reply re Claim Construction and Invalidity Under 112 in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment [111] filed by Defendant Central Industrial Supply Company (twdb,) (Entered: Oct. 5, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Notice of Motion and Motion to Deem an Admission Binding, or in the alternative, Motion for Order to Add Inequitable Conduct, Replace an Expert, and Disqualify Counsel filed by defendant Central Industrial Supply Company, (twdb,) (Entered: Oct. 25, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Declaration of Lowell Anderson re Motion to Deem Admission Binding, or alternative, Motion for Order to Add Inequitable Conduct, Replace an Expert, and Disqualify Counsel [132] filed by defendant Central Industrial Supply Company (twdb,) (Entered: Oct. 25, 2005).
U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Stipulation and Order with Prejudice of all Claims Between Jonathan Manufacturing Corporation and Central Industrial Supply Company by Judge David O. Carter: (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb,) (Entered: Nov. 3, 2005).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Controller for a quick disconnect slide assembly does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Controller for a quick disconnect slide assembly, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controller for a quick disconnect slide assembly will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3882462

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.