Surgery – Internal organ support or sling
Reexamination Certificate
2000-02-11
2002-10-08
Shaver, Kevin (Department: 3736)
Surgery
Internal organ support or sling
C128S899000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06461293
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a food intake restriction apparatus and method. More specifically, the invention relates to a food intake restriction apparatus and method for surgical application in the abdomen of a patient for forming an upper pouch and a stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus. The term patient includes an animal or a human being.
Food intake restriction apparatus in the form of a gastric banding device, in which a band encircles a portion of a patient's stomach to restrict the food intake of the patient, have been used in surgery for morbid obesity to form a small gastric pouch above the band and a reduced stoma opening in the stomach. Although such a band is applied around the stomach to obtain an optimal stoma opening during surgery, some prior gastric banding devices are provided with an adjustment means enabling a minor post-operation adjustment of the size of the stoma opening. In all such prior art devices such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,592,339, European Patent No. 0611561 and International Patent Application WO 94/27504, the adjustment means typically comprises an inflatable cavity in the band and an injection port in fluid connection with the inflatable cavity for adding fluid to or withdrawing fluid from the latter. In practice, the band is made of silicone rubber which is a material approved for implantation and the fluid is a liquid such as an isotonic salt solution.
It has also been found that the volume of the gastric pouch above the band increases in size up to ten times after operation. Therefore the pouch volume during surgery needs to be very small, approximately 7 ml. To enable the patient to feed the stomach with sufficient nutrition immediately after an operation considering such a small gastric pouch, the stoma initially needs to be relatively large and later needs to be substantially reduced, as the pouch volume increases. To be able to achieve a significant range of adjustment of the band, the cavity in the band has to be relatively large and is defined by a thin flexible wall, normally made of silicone material. Furthermore, the size of the stoma opening has to be gradually reduced during the first year after surgery as the gastric pouch increases in size. As indicated above, the reduction of the stoma opening using the prior art devices is achieved by adding liquid to the cavity of the band via the injection port to expand the band radially inwardly.
A great disadvantage of repeatedly injecting liquid via the injection port is the increased risk of the patient getting an infection in the body area surrounding the injection port. If such an infection occurs the injection port has to be surgically removed from the patient. Moreover, such an infection might be spread along the tube interconnecting the injection port and the band to the stomach, causing even more serious complications. Thus, the stomach might be infected where it is in contact with the band, which might result in the band migrating through the wall of the stomach. Also, it is uncomfortable for the patient when the necessary, often many, post-operation adjustments of the stoma opening are carried out using an injection needle penetrating the skin of the patient into the injection port.
It may happen that the patient swallows pieces of food too large to pass through the restricted stoma opening. If that occurs the patient has to visit a doctor who can remove the food pieces, if the band design so permits, by withdrawing some liquid from the band to enlarge the stoma opening to allow the food pieces to pass the stoma. Then, the doctor has to add liquid to the band in order to regain the restricted stoma opening. Again, these measures require the use of an injection needle penetrating the skin of the patient, which is uncomfortable for the patient.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the invention is to provide a food intake restriction apparatus for forming a stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus of a patient which permits regular post-operation adjustments that are comfortable for the patient.
Another object of the present invention to provide a new food intake restriction which is easy to adjust and does not require the use of an injection needle for accomplishing post-operation adjustments of the stoma opening.
Accordingly, there is provided a food intake restriction apparatus, comprising an operable restriction device implanted in a patient and engaging the stomach or esophagus to form an upper pouch and a restricted stoma opening in the stomach or esophagus, a source of energy for energizing the restriction device, and a control device operable from outside the patient's body for releasing energy from the source of energy, wherein the released energy is used in connection with the operation of the restriction device.
As a result, the advantage is achieved that the implanted restriction device can be non-invasively operated, when the restriction device has to be adjusted. Furthermore, the apparatus of the invention provides a simple and effective control of the energy supplied to implanted components of the apparatus which ensures an extended and reliable functionality of the apparatus, possibly for the rest of the patient's natural life, and at lest many years.
The restriction device preferably controls the size of the stoma opening. This may allow the patient to temporarily open up the stoma opening to remove food pieces stuck therein.
The control device may also control the restriction device. The control device may comprise an internal control unit, preferably including a microprocessor, implanted in the patient for controlling the restriction device. The control device may further comprise an external control unit outside the patient's body, wherein the internal control unit is programmable by the external control unit, for example for controlling the restriction device over time. Alternatively, the internal control unit may control the restriction device over time in accordance with an activity schedule program, which may be adapted to the patient's needs.
Conveniently, the external control unit may load the internal control unit with data in accordance with a loading mode only authorized for a doctor. For specialized controls of the restriction device, the external control unit may control the internal control unit in accordance with a doctor mode, only authorized for the doctor. For simple controls of the restriction device, the external control unit may control the internal control unit in accordance with a patient mode permitted for the patient. Thus, by using the external control unit in accordance with different modes it is possible to have certain functions of the restriction device controlled by the patient and other more advanced functions controlled by the doctor resulting, which enables a flexible post-operation treatment of the patient.
Generally, the apparatus further comprises an operation device implanted in the patient for operating the restriction device, wherein the control device controls the operation device to operate the restriction device. The control device may directly power the operation device with energy released from the source of energy and/or power other implanted energy consuming components of the apparatus. The term directly is used to mean, on one hand, that the operation device is powered with released energy while the latter is being released by the control device, on the other hand, that the released energy may be somewhat delayed, in the order of seconds, by for instance an energy stabilizer before powering the operation device. The advantage of directly using energy as it is released is that the apparatus can be of a very simple design and the few components involved makes the apparatus extremely reliable.
The restriction device may be non-inflatable, i.e. with no hydraulic fluid involved for the adjustments of the restriction device. This eliminates problems with fluid leaking from the restriction.
The operation device may comprise hydraulic means and at l
Cadugan Joseph A.
Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.
Obtech Medical AG
Shaver Kevin
LandOfFree
Controlled food intake restriction does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Controlled food intake restriction, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controlled food intake restriction will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2995214