Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk...

Details Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk... Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk...

2001-04-23

2002-10-29

Lee, Benny (Department: 2817)

Wave transmission lines and networks

Plural channel systems

Having branched circuits

C333S188000, C029S025350, C310S312000, C310S364000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06472954

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates generally to acoustic resonators and more particularly to controlling the effective coupling coefficient of a film bulk acoustic resonator.
BACKGROUND ART
In many different communications applications, a common signal path is coupled to both an input of a receiver and an output of a transmitter. For example, in a cellular or cordless telephone, an antenna may be coupled to the receiver and the transmitter. In such an arrangement, a duplexer is often used to couple the common signal path to the input and the output. The function of the duplexer is to provide the necessary coupling to and from the common signal path, while preventing the signals generated by the transmitter from being coupled to the input of the receiver.
One type of duplexer is referred to as the half duplexer. A half duplexer uses a switch to connect the common signal path to the receiver or the transmitter on a time division basis. The half duplexer has the desired coupling and attenuation properties, but is unacceptable in many telephony applications, since it does not allow parties of a call to speak and be heard simultaneously.
A type of duplexer that is more acceptable for telephony applications is the full duplexer. A full duplexer operates only if the transmit signal has a frequency that is different than the frequency of the receive signal. The full duplexer incorporates band-pass filters that isolate the transmit signal from the receive signal according to the frequencies.
FIG. 1
illustrates a conventional circuit used in cellular telephones, personal communication system (PCS) devices and other transmit/receive devices. A power amplifier
10
of a transmitter is connected to a transmit port
12
of a full duplexer
14
. The duplexer also includes a receive port
16
that is connected to a low noise amplifier (LNA)
18
of a receiver. In addition to the transmit port and the receive port, the duplexer
14
includes an antenna port
20
, which is connected to an antenna
22
.
The duplexer
14
is a three-port device having the transmit port
12
, the receive port
16
and the antenna port
20
. Internally, the duplexer includes a transmit band-pass filter
24
, a receiver band-pass filter
26
and a phase shifter
28
. The passbands of the two filters
24
and
26
are respectively centered on the frequency range of the transmit signal that is input via the power amplifier
10
and the receive signal to which the receiver is tuned.
The requirements for the band-pass filters
24
and
26
of the duplexer
14
are stringent. The band-pass filters must isolate low intensity receive signals generated at the antenna
22
and directed to the input of the low noise amplifier
18
from the strong transmit signals generated by the power amplifier
10
. In a typical embodiment, the sensitivity of the low noise amplifier may be in the order of −100 dBm, while the power amplifier may provide transmit signals having an intensity of approximately 28 dBm. It is expected that the duplexer
14
must attenuate the transmit signal by approximately
50
dB between the antenna port
20
and the receive port
16
to prevent any residual transmit signal mixed with the receive signal at the receive port from overloading the low noise amplifier.
One type of PCS that is used in a mobile telephone employs code division multiple access (CDMA). The CDMA PCS wireless bands are centered at approximately 1920 MHz and have an especially stringent regulatory requirement for duplexer performance. Some concerns will be identified with reference to
FIG. 2. A
passband
30
is defined by several poles and several zeros. The poles and zeros are equidistantly spaced from a center frequency
32
. For the transmitter passband
30
, the transmitter-to-antenna insertion loss
34
is preferably better than −3 dB over most of the band. The isolation from the transmitter to receiver ports exceeds 50 dB across most of the transmitter band and 46 dB in the receiver band. The crossover between the transmitter and receiver bands occurs around 1920 MHz. The transmitter and receiver bands are approximately 3.0 percent of the carrier frequency, so that extremely sharp filter roll-off
36
and
38
is required. As will be explained more fully below, the lower-frequency poles and zeroes and the roll-off
36
are determined by the characteristics of shunt resonators, while the higher-frequency poles and zeroes and the roll-off
38
are determined by the characteristics of series resonators.
Another challenge for the duplexer is achieving power handling requirements. The power amplifier
10
of
FIG. 1
in the transmitter can deliver 1 Watt of power to the transmit port
12
of the duplexer
14
. The band-pass filter
24
must be capable of handling such power without being destroyed and without its performance being degraded.
The duplexer
14
will be described in greater detail with reference to FIG.
3
. The duplexer includes a transmit film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR) array
40
and a receive FBAR array
42
. The transmit FBAR array is a two-stage ladder circuit having two series FBARs
44
and
46
and two shunt FBARs
50
and
52
. The series FBARs are connected in series between the transmit port
12
and the antenna port
20
, while the shunt FBARs are connected between electrical ground and nodes between the series FBARs. Each full stage of an FBAR array is composed of one series FBAR and one shunt FBAR. In order to handle the high power generated by the power amplifier at the filter input of the transmit filter, power bars are used for each of the series elements
44
and
46
.
The receive FBAR array is a 3½-stage ladder circuit. A half stage is limited to either one series FBAR or one shunt FBAR. In the exemplary array
42
, the half stage is a shunt FBAR
60
. The FBAR array includes three series FBARs
54
,
56
and
58
and four shunt FBARs
60
,
62
,
64
and
66
. The series FBARs are connected in series between the ninety degree phase shifter
28
and the receive port
16
. The shunt FBARs are connected between electrical ground and nodes between the series FBARs.
Circuits suitable for use as the ninety degree phase shifter
28
are known in the art. As examples, the phase shifter may be composed of inductors and capacitors or may be a &lgr;/4 transmission line.
Within the transmit FBAR array
40
, each series FBAR
44
and
46
may have the same resonant frequency (f
r
Tx
), which may be centered at 1880 MHz. Similarly, the shunt FBARs
50
and
52
may have the same resonant frequency, but the resonant frequency of the series FBARs is approximately 1.0 percent to 3.0 percent (typically 1.6 percent) greater than that of the shunt FBARs. As a result, the poles that were described with reference to
FIG. 2
are provided.
The receive FBAR array
42
of the receive band-pass filter
26
may also be composed of series FBARs
54
,
56
and
58
having the same f
r
Rx
and shunt FBARs
60
,
62
,
64
and
66
having the same resonant frequency that is 3.0 percent different than the resonant frequency f
r
Rx
of the series FBARs. Here, f
r
Rz
is centered at 1960 MHz.
Other considerations that affect the shape of the response shown in
FIG. 2
are the figure of merit, which is referred to as Q, and the effective coupling coefficient, which is also referred to as kt
2
. The effective coupling coefficient may be considered as being the ratio of electrical energy to acoustic energy in the operation of a particular FBAR. It has been the goal to maximize both Q and the effective coupling coefficient. As a result of the fabrication process, the effective coupling coefficient can be as high as 8.0 percent. It has been experimentally determined that Q is dependent upon kt
2
and, in some cases, that it is better to decrease kt
2
in order to significantly increase Q. The Q determines the roll-off of the response.
What is needed is a fabrication method and a resulting duplexer which provide a very steep roll-off in the operation of an array of acoustic resonators.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Controlled effective coupling coefficients for film bulk... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2977428