Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Specific identifiable device – circuit – or system – Unwanted signal suppression
Patent
1994-12-02
1997-06-10
Cunningham, Terry
Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices, circuits, and
Specific identifiable device, circuit, or system
Unwanted signal suppression
327317, 327552, 381 71, G10K 1116
Patent
active
056380224
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
This invention relates to a control system for canceling periodic or nearly periodic disturbances. Features of this control system include a delayed inverse filter, a variable delay and, optionally, a comb filter. Unlike previous systems, little or no adaption is required and, since the system is based in the time domain rather than the frequency domain, the computation required does not increase with the number of harmonics to be controlled.
The control system has many applications including the active control of sound and vibration and the selective removal of periodic noise in communications signals.
BACKGROUND
The principle of reducing unwanted disturbance by generating a disturbance with the opposite phase is well documented. The technique is often referred to as active control to distinguish from passive control where the elements of the system are incapable of generating disturbances. Nelson and Elliot, "Active Control of Sound", Academic Press (1992) review some of the work done to date.
The earliest technique in this field was done by P. Lueg who described an actuator and sensor coupled by a simple negative feedback loop in U.S. Pat. No. 2,043,416.
The main shortcoming of this system is that the disturbance can only be reduced over a limited range of low frequencies. This is because of the finite response time of the control system (the time taken for a signal sent to the actuator to cause a response at the sensor). The control loop cannot compensate for the phase shifts associated with this delay, and so only operates at low frequencies where the phase shifts are small. The gain of the feedback loop must be low at other frequencies to maintain the stability of the system. This is achieved by incorporating a low pass filter into the loop--which introduces additional delay.
The range of applicability of active control systems has been extended by the use of more modern adaptive control techniques such as those described by B. Widrow and S. D. Stearns in "Adaptive Signal Processing", Prentice Hall (1985). In U.S. Pat. No. 5,105,377, Ziegler achieves feedback system stability by use of a compensation filter but the digital filter must still try to compensate for the phase characteristics of the system. This is not possible in general, but when the disturbance has a limited frequency bandwidth the digital filter can be adapted to have approximately the right phase characteristic at the frequencies of interest. The filter characteristic therefore depends on the disturbance as well as the system to be controlled and must be changed as the noise changes.
One class of disturbances for which this approach can be successful is periodic disturbances. These are characterized by a fundamental period, a time over which the disturbance repeats itself. Disturbances are not often exactly periodic, but any disturbance where the period changes over a timescale longer than that over which the disturbance itself changes can be included in this class.
Several approaches have been put forth for controlling periodic disturbances including that described by C. Ross in U.S. Pat. No. 4,480,333. The patent describes a feedforward control system in which a tachometer signal is fed through an adaptive digital filter. There is no description of the form of the tachometer signal but it contains no information on the amplitude of the disturbance to be controlled and thus the filter must again be adapted in response to the disturbance. Chaplin et al, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,153,815, describe the method of wave form synthesis, where a model of one cycle of the desired control signal is stored and then sent repetitively to the actuator. Nelson and Elliot, infra, describe the equivalence of these two approaches in the special case where the period remains constant.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,841, Chaplin et al recognize the benefit of splitting the stored waveform into its frequency components. The advantage of this step is that each frequency component can be adapted independently. This can improve the ability of the system to adapt to ra
REFERENCES:
patent: 3132339 (1964-05-01), Boughnou
patent: 3979682 (1976-09-01), Warwick
patent: 4449235 (1984-05-01), Swigert
patent: 4589136 (1986-05-01), Poldy et al.
patent: 4837834 (1989-06-01), Allie
Widrow and Stearns, "Adaptive Signal Processing,", 1985, pp. 294-301.
Castro et al., IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin -- "Time Domain Adjustable Eualizer", Oct./1977, pp. 1705-1706.
Cunningham Terry
Larson Renee Michelle
Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.
LandOfFree
Control system for periodic disturbances does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Control system for periodic disturbances, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Control system for periodic disturbances will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-768060