Control for material spreaders

Electricity: motive power systems – Positional servo systems – With particular 'error-detecting' means

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C318S446000, C239S677000, C239S687000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06262553

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to controls for accessories attached or mounted to vehicles and more specifically to a cab mounted control for controlling a high current power source for an electric motor which drives an accessory such as a spreader for sand or salt that is coupled to a vehicle.
2. Description of the Related Art
There are many devices that are coupled with a vehicle that require a separate motor to control and operate the device. For instance, a spreader is often mounted on a vehicle to aid in the deposition of granular material such as salt, seed, fertilizers, chemical agents, sand or the like onto a surface as the vehicle travels over it. The spreader is connected to a material supply bin, which is usually gravity fed. As the material falls through the spreader, its is distributed by an auger or similar driving device. The auger is powered by an electric motor which is controlled by the operator in the cab of the vehicle. The operator can start, stop and control the speed of the spreader by so controlling the motor. The speed of the spreader controls the distribution characteristics of the material being spread.
Traditionally, the electric motor requires a relatively high current power source to adequately drive the spreader. Therefore, the motor control circuitry employed must be able to handle such a high current load. Obviously, any type of circuitry capable of handling such a level of current is appropriate. Generally, the power control circuit is mounted in the cab of the vehicle. The operator then actuates a control which will turn on, turn off and vary the speed of the electric motor by varying the amount of current which ultimately reaches the motor.
While this arrangement provides all of the necessary control the operator may require, it also creates several areas of concern. In order to make such an arrangement functional, relatively heavy gauge wire must be run through the firewall of the vehicle and into the cab. In and of itself, this is a modification which many vehicle owners may be hesitant to make as a correspondingly large hole must be cut. Furthermore, the cab and spreader are usually located on opposite ends of the vehicle. As such, a long length of this heavy gauge wire must be utilized. This adds significantly to the cost of such a system. In order to locate the power control circuitry remotely from the motor and driver device, rather large and very expensive high current handling electrical plugs must be utilized, further increasing the overall cost. These plugs are used to couple the high current wire to a control box that contains the MOSFET and also to couple the wire to a junction with the electric motor. In addition, the length of the wire reduces the efficiency of the system due to the voltage drop-off encountered. Finally, the size of the wire makes it difficult to conceal. As such, the exposed wire is subject to abrasions and inadvertent cutting.
The most significant concern, however, is the relatively large amount of heat that is generated by a MOSFET (or similar component) located within the cab of a vehicle, when handling high current loads. The heat generated by the control circuitry represents a fire hazard and severely limits the design parameters available during installation. Typically, the cab mounted circuitry occupies almost 2 square feet of space. It is difficult to place such a large device within the cab of a vehicle because the heat produced will often adversely affect the surrounding components. A large number of the items within the cab are made of plastic and are thus subject to melt. Wiring proximate the control circuit can also be damaged by the heat and thus short circuit. This causes obvious mechanical/electrical problems and also creates a risk of fire. If the circuitry can be mounted in a location that does not affect components in the cab, it will prevent the operator from being able to fully utilize the cab. That is, anything brought into the cab must be carefully placed to avoid contact with the control circuit.
As such, the heat generated by previous power control circuits is of significant concern. There has been no way to minimize this heat generation as those components which can handle the required current levels must necessarily dissipate this heat in some manner. Presently, such systems must simply be installed within the cab of the vehicle, in a location which hopefully minimizes the exposure of sensitive elements to the high levels of heat generated. The heat is simply allowed to dissipate into the surrounding air. Such installation presumes that the airflow within the cab will be sufficient to prevent the control circuitry from overheating. This is often incorrect, and as a result, the control circuitry may be prone to overheating, thus amplifying the above described concerns. Since the space inside the cabs of vehicles is so limited, the placement of the control is extremely problematic. As a result, vehicle owners must risk serious damage to their vehicles and forego the use of significant amounts of space within the cab in order to simply control an attachment which is mounted on the vehicle.
Therefore, there exists a need to provide an accessory control unit for high current drawing vehicle accessories that is electrically efficient and thermally isolated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention places all the high current switching circuitry within the accessory at or near the electric motor. A low current control line is run from the cab of the vehicle to the switching circuitry, thus giving the operator full control over the electric motor without having the physically intrusive high current wires inside the cab of the vehicle. Since the power is brought directly to the motor, as opposed to a long control line run, the system is more efficient.
Locating the switching circuitry within the accessory prevents the heat generated by the circuitry from posing any hazard within the cab of the vehicle. In addition, the circuitry can be directly connected to the casing of the electric motor. Generally, the casing is an aluminum shell, which acts as a heat sink to the switching circuitry. The circuitry can be placed on the inside of the motor casing to conserve space. Alternatively, the circuitry can be mounted to the outside of the motor casing, or even adjacent to it, thus allowing the present system to be more easily retrofit into existing devices.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a MOSFET is used to control the high current flow to the electric motor. The MOSFET is mounted on the inner wall of the motor casing. A low current control within the cab actuates the MOSFET, which in turn controls the flow of current to the electric motor. In a preferred embodiment, a photovoltaic isolator is used to control the MOSFET. The photovoltaic isolator includes a variable LED and a photovoltaic generator. The intensity of the LED is varied by the cab control. The LED is located proximate to the photovoltaic generator that is coupled to the gate of the MOSFET. As the intensity of the light emitted by the LED increases, the photovoltaic generator increases the voltage at the gate, thus controlling the MOSFET in a known way. Alternatively, the MOSFET may be controlled directly through the actuation of a variable resistor or similar element, which directly controls the voltage generated at the gate.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3677540 (1972-07-01), Weiss
patent: 3679098 (1972-07-01), Weiss
patent: 4105938 (1978-08-01), Mathews, Jr.
patent: 4132941 (1979-01-01), Sousek et al.
patent: 4166581 (1979-09-01), Hetrick
patent: 4461984 (1984-07-01), Whitaker et al.
patent: 4495421 (1985-01-01), Endo et al.
patent: 4668898 (1987-05-01), Harms et al.
patent: 4779031 (1988-10-01), Arends et al.
patent: 4784563 (1988-11-01), Esh et al.
patent: 4786822 (1988-11-01), Steely
patent: 4851969 (1989-07-01), Davenport et al.
patent: 5038088 (1991-08-01), Arends et al.
patent: 5201023 (1993-04-01), Motzko
patent: 5389823 (1995-02-01), Hopkins et al.
patent: 544

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Control for material spreaders does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Control for material spreaders, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Control for material spreaders will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2547217

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.