Electricity: power supply or regulation systems – Output level responsive – Using a three or more terminal semiconductive device as the...
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-05
2003-01-14
Riley, Shawn (Department: 2838)
Electricity: power supply or regulation systems
Output level responsive
Using a three or more terminal semiconductive device as the...
Reexamination Certificate
active
06507177
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a control circuit for the power-controlled operation of a load, comprising a semiconductor switch which is effective in a load circuit and comprising a drive circuit for the semiconductor switch, which generates a control signal, comprising drive pulses following one after the other and separated by interpulse periods, for controlling the said semiconductor switch in a part-load range.
A control circuit of this type is known from the prior art, for example DE 197 02 949 A1.
A control circuit of this type generates a control signal which has drive pulses which follow one another in a defined frequency and are pulse-width-modulated for controlling the load.
Since the switching on and off of the load brought about by the drive pulses leads in a known way to high losses, and in particular increased heat generation, especially in the case of an inductive load with a freewheeling element, i.e., for example, a freewheeling semiconductor component, it is to be regarded as the object of the present invention to improve a control circuit of the generic type in such a way that as little heat as possible is generated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This object is achieved according to the invention in the case of a control circuit of the type described at the beginning by the control signal generating in an upper part-load range a first pulse signal, with first individual pulses following one another with a first pulse frequency, and a second pulse signal, with second individual pulses following one another with a second frequency, in the interpulse periods of the first pulse signal, and by the second frequency being greater than the first frequency by at least a factor of 10.
It is consequently to be regarded as the essence of the present invention on the one hand to drive the load, i.e. for example a motor acting as an inductive load, by the first pulse signal with low frequency in such a way that this pulse signal allows as much power as possible to be supplied to the load with as few switching-on and switching-off operations as possible, but on the other hand likewise to supply power by the second pulse signal with high frequency in the long periods between the individual pulses caused by the low frequency of the first pulse signal, in order to avoid the disadvantages of exclusively operating the load by only the first pulse signal with low frequency, these disadvantages being manifested in particular by the development of mechanical noises or the production of mechanical resonances.
With regard to controlling the power which is to be supplied to the load, a wide variety of possibilities exist here. One possibility would be to alter the frequency of the second pulse signal or, if appropriate, also of the first pulse signal.
Since, however, defined fixed frequencies are preferably used for the pulsed operation of a load to avoid peripheral disturbing influences, it is preferably provided that in the upper part-load range at least one of the first and second pulse signals can be pulse-width-modulated for power control, i.e. that the power supplied to the load can be controlled by means of varying the pulse width while the respective pulse signal has a fixed frequency.
It is particularly favourable in the case of the solution according to the invention if in the upper part-load range both pulse signals can be pulse-width-modulated, so that incremental adjustment of the pulse width of the two pulse signals allows the desired precision of the control to be achieved by setting the pulse width of that pulse signal which has the smaller increments. This is preferably the second pulse signal, it also being possible to use the second pulse signal to reduce an increase in the pulse width of the first pulse signal by a decreasing pulse width of the second pulse signal.
In the case of a control circuit operating in a particularly simple way, it is preferably provided that in the upper part-load range only one of the pulse signals can be pulse-width-modulated.
In this case, particularly precise power control can be carried out by allowing the upper part-load range to be divided into a highest upper part-load range and a normal upper part-load range and by allowing the individual pulses of the first pulse signal to be pulse-width-modulated in the normal upper part-load range and the individual pulses of the second pulse signal to be pulse-width-modulated in the highest upper part-load range.
In particular in the case of an embodiment operating in as simple a way as possible, it is at the same time provided that in the normal upper part-load range, the pulse width of the individual pulses of the second pulse signal is constant, and in the highest upper part-load range, the pulse width of the individual pulses of the first pulse signal is preferably constant.
It would be conceivable, for example, within the scope of the solution according to the invention, also to operate outside the upper part-load range with a control signal which exhibits the first pulse signal and, in the interpulse periods of the same, the second pulse signal.
However, for reasons of control simplicity and adequate precision, it is particularly favourable if, in a part-load range lying below the upper part-load range, the control signal comprises a third pulse signal with a third frequency, which is greater than the first frequency, so that the individual pulses of the third pulse signal follow one another at correspondingly small time intervals.
At the same time, the third frequency should preferably be of the same order of magnitude as the second frequency, so that both the second frequency and the third frequency are significantly above the first frequency, to allow driving of the load to be performed in the lower part-load range with as little noise and resonance as possible.
A solution which is particularly favourable on account of its simplicity provides that the third frequency and the second frequency are approximately of the same magnitude, so that the advantageous control properties of a pulse signal with a relatively high pulse frequency can consequently be utilized both in the lower part-load range and in the upper part-load range.
A particularly favourable solution provides that the third frequency is identical to the second frequency, so that ultimately the same frequency can always be used both for operating the load in the lower part-load range and for operating the load in the upper part-load range, and the second pulse signal is simply added when there is a transition from the lower part-load range to the upper part-load range.
For the power control in the lower part-load range, in this case the third pulse signal can preferably likewise be pulse-width-modulated.
The transition from the lower part-load range into the upper part-load range may in principle lie at any desired values of the part load. A particularly advantageous solution provides that the transition from the lower part-load range into the upper part-load range takes place at part-load values between approximately 20% and approximately 50%, in each case with respect to full load.
A particularly favourable solution provides that the transition from the lower part-load range into the upper part-load range takes place at part-load values of approximately 30% to approximately 40%. With regard to the differences of the second frequency and the third frequency with respect to the first frequency, it is adequate in principle—as already stated—that they are at least a factor of 10. It is particularly favourable, however, if the frequency differences have a factor of the order of magnitude of 30 or more, preferably the order of magnitude of 100 or more.
In principle it would be possible to operate in the part-load range below full driving of the load with further part-load ranges, for example also between the lower part-load range and the upper part-load range. For reasons of simplicity, however, it has been found to be favourable if the upper part-load range follows on directly from the lower part-load range.
Flock Horst
Fortmeier Ignaz
Alcoa Fujikura Gesellschaft mit beschraenkter Haftung
Lipsitz Barry R.
Riley Shawn
LandOfFree
Control circuit for the power controlled operation of a load does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Control circuit for the power controlled operation of a load, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Control circuit for the power controlled operation of a load will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3028091