Chemistry of inorganic compounds – Oxygen or compound thereof – Peroxide
Reexamination Certificate
2001-10-19
2004-06-29
Bos, Steven (Department: 1754)
Chemistry of inorganic compounds
Oxygen or compound thereof
Peroxide
C423S588000, C423S272000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06756028
ABSTRACT:
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The present invention relates to a continuous catalytic hydrogenation process, in which the hydrogenation catalyst suspended in the reaction mixture is recirculated. This process is particularly suitable for the hydrogenation step in the anthraquinone process for the production of hydrogen peroxide.
In known hydrogenation processes the catalyst is generally used as a fixed bed, as a supported or as a suspended catalyst.
In the fixed bed reactor the catalyst is applied to a support. A great disadvantage of this type of reactor is the slow transfer of the gaseous hydrogen into the solution and on to the catalyst surface.
Various ways of bringing the hydrogen into solution more rapidly have been suggested. U.S. Pat. No. 2,837,411 describes the saturation of the solution with hydrogen before hydrogenation in a separate tank. Considerable investment costs and the fact that only a fraction of the hydrogen required in the reaction can be brought into solution make this route unattractive.
Even the pre-mixing of the hydrogen with solution to be hydrogenated by means of a static mixer, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,428,922, leads only to a slight improvement, since the hydrogen bubbles coalesce on contact with the inserts in the reactor.
When using a supported or suspended catalyst, as described in EP-A-111 133, these disadvantages do not occur.
In EP-A-111 133 it is shown that in a continuous co-current catalytic hydrogenation process for the production of hydrogen peroxide by the so-called anthraquinone process, the efficiency of the hydrogenation can be increased if this is carried out in a loop reactor at flow velocities of more than 3 m/s, preferably 4-7 m/s. The flow velocity is selected such that the gas/liquid interface remains as produced at the beginning of the reactor. In this way the hydrogen can react completely along the reaction zone and no separations occur between the gas and the liquid phase.
It is disadvantageous in this process described in EP-A-111 133 that the mixing devices for the substance to be hydrogenated and the hydrogen lead to large pressure drops, particularly when tubular reactors are to be operated at the high circulating flows and circulation rates specified, and therefore a higher input of energy is necessary.
An object of the present invention was therefore to overcome the problems associated with prior known processes and thereby increase the efficiency of a hydrogenation process in which a reaction mixture containing the substance to be hydrogenated, the hydrogenation product, hydrogen and the catalyst suspended in the reaction mixture, is recirculated.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The above and other objects can be achieved in accordance with the present invention by a process where the substance to be hydrogenated, the hydrogenation product, hydrogen and the hydrogenation catalyst suspended in the reaction mixture are recirculated in a reactor. In carrying out the process, part of the hydrogenation product is removed from the reactor and the substance to be hydrogenated and the hydrogen are fed into the reactor in a special way. Namely, it is a feature of the present invention that the substance to be hydrogenated and the hydrogen are mixed before entering the reactor.
As a result, the pressure drop in the hydrogenation reactor is reduced quite substantially, which leads to a reduction in the energy costs. Alternatively, the total circulating quantity can be increased at a constant speed of the circulating pump, which leads to a higher velocity and space-time yield and thus, ultimately, to an increase in capacity.
This result was surprising for the hydrogenation reactor described above, in which the majority of the reaction mixture is recirculated and only a small part is removed from the reactor, and accordingly the quantity of substance to be hydrogenated and of hydrogen being fed into the reactor is small in comparison with the quantity of the reaction mixture being recirculated.
As set forth in EP-A-111 133, the conversion in the type of reactor described above is greatest when the gas/liquid interface produced is maintained along the reaction zone. This is the case when the mixing of gas and liquid phase takes place at flow velocities of at least 3 m/s. Outside the hydrogenation reactor, the flow velocities are clearly lower than 3 m/s. In consequence, it should be expected that no transfer of the dispersion into the reactor should take place, accompanied by a reduced conversion. However, it has now been shown that, even when the gas and liquid phase are premixed upstream of the hydrogenation reactor, the conversion is not reduced.
The process according to the invention for the mixing of substance to be hydrogenated and hydrogen can preferably be carried out in that the gas bubbles produced in the mixing device have a maximum diameter of 2.5 mm, particularly preferably less than 1.5 mm, to allow a rapid transfer into the liquid phase.
Possible mixing devices with which this size of gas bubbles can be achieved are e.g. perforated plates, frits, nozzles or static mixers.
Particularly suitable for the process according to the invention is a venturi nozzle. This known device has a small pressure drop compared with other mixing devices, and is largely maintenance-free. As a function of the energy input and the volume flow, the nominal width of the channel is adjusted so that the maximum gas bubble diameter does not exceed 2.5 mm.
In addition to the bubble size, the stability of the bubbles is also significant. The bubbles should be prevented from coalescing, which would result in inadequate distribution of the hydrogen in the liquid phase.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention is therefore to carry out the hydrogenation in a coalescence-inhibited system. Coalescence-inhibited systems are to be understood as those gas/liquid systems in which the gas bubbles retain their size if no external influence is present. Interface-influencing values of the liquid, such as viscosity and specific surface tension, are responsible for this, together with the nature of the gas.
As described in EP-A-221 931, the working solutions used in the AO process for the production of hydrogen peroxide as the liquid phase fulfil the conditions for a coalescence-inhibited system when the sum quotient of all interfacial surface tensions of the components involved reaches at least 16 mN/m, preferably 17 to 25 mN/m.
In EP-A-221 931, oxygen or an oxygen
itrogen mixture is described as the gas phase. It can also be shown, by a simple test, that working solutions and hydrogen or a hydrogen-containing gas form a coalescence-inhibited system when the above-mentioned condition for the sum quotient of all interfacial surface tensions of the components involved is fulfilled. Thus, it can be ensured by an appropriate choice of the components of the reaction system and their relative quantities that, when hydrogen and working solution are pre-mixed, a coalescence-inhibited system is formed and enters the hydrogenation reactor as such.
In order to achieve a quantitative hydrogenation as far as possible, the gas portion of the premix of hydrogen and substance to be hydrogenated should be over 30 vol. %, preferably over 40 vol. %. The range is particularly preferably between 60 and 80 vol. %.
The maintenance of a coalescence-inhibited system during the course of the reaction is favoured by hydrogenation reactors that are free from inserts which, according to experience, lead to coalescence of the gas bubbles.
Particularly suitable types of reactors, the reaction chamber of which is free from inserts with a gas-splitting function, apart from the distributing device, are in particular stirred vessels, gas-lift reactors, fluidized-bed reactors or loop reactors for hydrogenation by the AO process for the production of hydrogen peroxide.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2837411 (1958-06-01), Jenney
patent: 4428922 (1984-01-01), Hopkins
patent: 4626604 (1986-12-01), Hiles et al.
patent: 5063043 (1991-11-01), Bengtsson
patent: 5071634 (1991
Korl Peter
Maurer Bernhard
Bos Steven
Degussa - AG
Wright, Sr. William G.
LandOfFree
Continuous hydrogenation process does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Continuous hydrogenation process, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Continuous hydrogenation process will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3355746