Continuous audit process control objectives

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Operations research or analysis

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007370, C705S301000, C705S007280

Reexamination Certificate

active

08005709

ABSTRACT:
A system for monitoring a business process including a business process, an indicator for determining a value representing the performance of the business process, and a performance monitor adapted to evaluate the indicator to determine the performance of the business process. The indicator can be associated with workflow-enabled business process or with a control associated with the business process. The performance monitor compares the value of the indicator with a target value. The target value can be inherited from an organizational unit associated with the business process, a control, or set by a user. The performance monitor creates a report summarizing a change in the value of the indicator over a period of time. The performance monitor also initiates an audit process of the business process when the difference between the value of the indicator and the target value exceeds a tolerance range associated with the target value.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5537590 (1996-07-01), Amado
patent: 5611052 (1997-03-01), Dykstra et al.
patent: 5701400 (1997-12-01), Amado
patent: 5726914 (1998-03-01), Janovski et al.
patent: 5737494 (1998-04-01), Guinta et al.
patent: 5754857 (1998-05-01), Gadol
patent: 5930762 (1999-07-01), Masch
patent: 5960404 (1999-09-01), Chaar et al.
patent: 6044354 (2000-03-01), Asplen, Jr.
patent: 6148335 (2000-11-01), Haggard et al.
patent: 6151582 (2000-11-01), Huang et al.
patent: 6154753 (2000-11-01), McFarland
patent: 6272472 (2001-08-01), Danneels et al.
patent: 6311166 (2001-10-01), Nado et al.
patent: 6327656 (2001-12-01), Zabetian
patent: 6336094 (2002-01-01), Ferguson et al.
patent: 6601233 (2003-07-01), Underwood
patent: 6643625 (2003-11-01), Acosta et al.
patent: 6654788 (2003-11-01), Chance et al.
patent: 6714915 (2004-03-01), Barnard et al.
patent: 6727106 (2004-04-01), Ankutse et al.
patent: 6763353 (2004-07-01), Li et al.
patent: 6850643 (2005-02-01), Smith et al.
patent: 6876992 (2005-04-01), Sullivan
patent: 7003477 (2006-02-01), Zarrow
patent: 7006992 (2006-02-01), Packwood
patent: 7069234 (2006-06-01), Cornelius et al.
patent: 7076727 (2006-07-01), Flam et al.
patent: 7113914 (2006-09-01), Spielmann et al.
patent: 7136827 (2006-11-01), Eicher
patent: 7185010 (2007-02-01), Morinville
patent: 7185192 (2007-02-01), Kahn
patent: 7188169 (2007-03-01), Buus et al.
patent: 7216132 (2007-05-01), Flam
patent: 7222329 (2007-05-01), Cole et al.
patent: 7246137 (2007-07-01), Paulus et al.
patent: 7249074 (2007-07-01), Land et al.
patent: 7290275 (2007-10-01), Baudoin et al.
patent: 7373310 (2008-05-01), Homsi
patent: 7412520 (2008-08-01), Sun
patent: 7523053 (2009-04-01), Pudhukottai et al.
patent: 7752070 (2010-07-01), Hatcher et al.
patent: 2001/0047274 (2001-11-01), Borton
patent: 2002/0035495 (2002-03-01), Spira et al.
patent: 2002/0038217 (2002-03-01), Young
patent: 2002/0046051 (2002-04-01), Katzman et al.
patent: 2002/0082891 (2002-06-01), McKay et al.
patent: 2002/0082895 (2002-06-01), Budka et al.
patent: 2002/0095322 (2002-07-01), Zarefoss
patent: 2002/0129221 (2002-09-01), Borgia et al.
patent: 2002/0138307 (2002-09-01), Kramer
patent: 2002/0143595 (2002-10-01), Frank et al.
patent: 2002/0174093 (2002-11-01), Casati et al.
patent: 2002/0184130 (2002-12-01), Blasko
patent: 2002/0188629 (2002-12-01), Burfoot
patent: 2002/0188653 (2002-12-01), Sun
patent: 2002/0194059 (2002-12-01), Blocher et al.
patent: 2002/0194942 (2002-12-01), Jensen et al.
patent: 2002/0198727 (2002-12-01), Ann et al.
patent: 2003/0046130 (2003-03-01), Golightly et al.
patent: 2003/0069821 (2003-04-01), Williams
patent: 2003/0126073 (2003-07-01), Lawrence
patent: 2003/0126181 (2003-07-01), Young
patent: 2003/0126431 (2003-07-01), Beattie et al.
patent: 2003/0149604 (2003-08-01), Casati et al.
patent: 2003/0216991 (2003-11-01), Baker
patent: 2003/0225687 (2003-12-01), Lawrence
patent: 2003/0229525 (2003-12-01), Callahan et al.
patent: 2003/0233571 (2003-12-01), Kraus et al.
patent: 2003/0236725 (2003-12-01), Hickox et al.
patent: 2004/0044617 (2004-03-01), Lu
patent: 2004/0117283 (2004-06-01), Germack
patent: 2004/0122756 (2004-06-01), Creeden et al.
patent: 2004/0128186 (2004-07-01), Breslin et al.
patent: 2004/0162741 (2004-08-01), Flaxer et al.
patent: 2004/0177326 (2004-09-01), Bibko et al.
patent: 2004/0181665 (2004-09-01), Houser
patent: 2004/0216039 (2004-10-01), Lane et al.
patent: 2004/0236740 (2004-11-01), Cho et al.
patent: 2004/0260566 (2004-12-01), King
patent: 2004/0260583 (2004-12-01), King et al.
patent: 2004/0260591 (2004-12-01), King et al.
patent: 2004/0260628 (2004-12-01), Minton et al.
patent: 2004/0260634 (2004-12-01), King et al.
patent: 2005/0197952 (2005-09-01), Shea et al.
patent: 2005/0209899 (2005-09-01), King et al.
patent: 2005/0228685 (2005-10-01), Schuster et al.
patent: 2005/0251464 (2005-11-01), Ames et al.
patent: 2006/0059026 (2006-03-01), King et al.
patent: 2006/0064365 (2006-03-01), Yancey
patent: 2006/0074739 (2006-04-01), King et al.
patent: 2006/0089861 (2006-04-01), King et al.
patent: 2006/0106686 (2006-05-01), King et al.
patent: 2006/0235732 (2006-10-01), Miller et al.
patent: 2006/0241991 (2006-10-01), Pudhukottai et al.
patent: 2007/0022025 (2007-01-01), Litman et al.
patent: 2007/0088636 (2007-04-01), Nault
patent: 2007/0150330 (2007-06-01), McGoveran
patent: 2007/0156495 (2007-07-01), King
patent: WO 2004/088561 (2004-10-01), None
patent: WO 2005/055098 (2005-06-01), None
King, Nigel. The Convergence of Financial and Supply Chain Planning. Management Accounting—London v77n5, pp. 30-34. May 1999. from Dialog file 15: 01826155.
King, Nigel. The convergence of financial and supply chain planning. Management Accounting—London v77n5 p. 30-34 May 1999.
Gray, N. S., “RISK.02, PRAM It or Walk Away,”AACE International Transactions, 4 pages (1998).
Kim et al., “Using Enterprise Reference Models for Automated ISO 9000 Compliance Evaluation,”Proc. 35th Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, 10 pages, (2002).
Kokmen, L., “Web takes matchmaking to online level,” Denver Post, Sep. 21, 1998, p. F.06; 2 pages downloaded from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=27&sid=4&srchmode=1&vinst=PROD&fmt=3&clientId=19649&RQT=309&Vname=PQD.
Leymann et al., “Managing business processes as an information resource,”IBM Systems Journal, 33(2):326-348 (1994).
Higuera et al., “Software Risk Management,” Technical Report, CMU/SEI-96-TR-012, ESC-TR-096-012, by Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Jun. 1996.
“Approva Introduces BizRights 2.0 Software to Facilitate More Secure, Effective Business Controls and Processes,”Business Wire, Apr. 6, 2004, 3 pages, available at http://proquest.umi.com/pdqweb?did=609773321&sid=5&Fmt=3&clientId=19649&RQT=309&VName=PDQ.
Susan S. Lightly, Cynthia Waller Vallario; “Segregation of duties in ERP;” The Internal Auditor Altamonte Springs:; Oct. 2003; vol. 60; Issue 5; p. 27.
US Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,875, dated on Mar. 19, 2009, pp. 17.
US Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,041, dated on Mar. 16, 2009, pp. 14.
US Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/971,973, dated on Mar. 17, 2009, pp. 22.
Microsoft Project 2000 for Windows Product Enhancements Guide, Oct. 1999, 46 pages, Microsoft Corporation.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,055; mailed on Jun. 17, 2009; 15 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,055; mailed on Sep. 9, 2009; 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,417; mailed on Jul. 9, 2009; 32 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,421; mailed on Jul. 9, 2009; 20 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/804,364; mailed on Aug. 18, 2009; 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/926,194; mailed on Aug. 17, 2009; 40 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,055; mailed on Aug. 21, 2007; pp. 11.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,055; mailed on Feb. 26, 2008; pp. 11.
Final Office Action fo

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Continuous audit process control objectives does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Continuous audit process control objectives, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Continuous audit process control objectives will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2752447

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.