Refrigeration – Portable – commodity-containing
Patent
1999-03-04
2000-09-12
Bennett, Henry
Refrigeration
Portable, commodity-containing
624572, 62530, F25O 308
Patent
active
061160423
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to containers. In particular, the present invention discloses containers suitable for transporting temperature sensitive products, such as human blood products.
2. Background Art
The conventional means of shipping blood and blood products involves the use of an insulated box, with the necessary shipping and warning labels, along with some cooling agent. These cooling agents are typically a frozen gel, dry ice, or glistening (wet) ice.
There are, however, several problems with the conventional approach. First, the styrofoam used for insulation does not degrade readily, leading to disposal problems. These problems are so severe that many countries ban the use of styrofoam, thus severely restricting international shipments of biological materials. Second, the cooling agents also present numerous practical problems in field use. Specifically, gel systems are often too expensive for routine use and disposal. As for dry ice, the carbon dioxide gas evolved during shipment is so dangerous to shipping personnel that hazard warnings must be posted and additional fees paid; furthermore, outright bans on dry ice are pending in several areas. Finally, wet ice poses handling problems in packing, as well as leakage and product soaking problems.
Existing shipping systems also suffer from other serious problems. First, many systems do not employ coolants in the proper temperature range. For example, one company ships vaccine packed in dry ice, even through the specification for storage is approximately -15.degree. C. The result of this practice is excessive cooling, resulting in damage to the vaccine.
Another problem often observed with conventional systems is failure to maintain the proper temperature over time, due to inadequate insulation and/or inadequate cooling pack capacity. Again, the end result is product damage.
Yet another problem commonly observed with conventional shipping systems is a strong sensitivity to infrared heat transfer. Specifically, many systems heat rapidly when left in direct sunlight. Part of this susceptibility may be due to the standard industry practice of testing shipping containers only in convective, non-radiative heating systems. While this practice is quite appropriate for shaded or otherwise protected systems, these results do not apply to the common situation of shipping containers left in direct sunlight on loading docks, etc.
An additional problem is that many boxes do not tolerate the condensation that results during conditions of high humidity. Common failures include box collapse due to dissolution of starch seals, as well as excessive swelling of the box walls themselves.
Finally, the vast majority of shipping systems do not provide uniform temperatures within the container. For example, one system that is currently used to transport blood samples for laboratory analysis consists of a set of frozen gel packs placed on a shelf at the top of a standard RSC (Rigid Shipping Container) cardboard box. Instrumented tests of this system, however, showed that only the samples immediately below the cooling packs were ever in the specified temperature range of 0 to 10.degree. C.; furthermore, these samples were in this range for only 8 of the required 24 hour test duration, even at a mild ambient temperature of 22.degree. C. Conversely, samples at the bottom of the box were never in the required temperature range, except for approximately 15 minutes after loading from the storage refrigerator. Less severe, but still significant, uniformity problems were also found for other shipping systems. Several of these systems showed extreme temperature inversions of 10.degree. C. or more, typically the result of the placement of cooling media only at the top of the shipping system. Again, samples at the bottom of the box never receive adequate cooling. Similarly, the common problems of the failure of shipping personnel to obey "This Side Up" instructions also leads to inadequate cooling of some of the load.
The consequence o
REFERENCES:
patent: 881025 (1908-03-01), Parker
patent: 2507929 (1950-05-01), Pennebaker
patent: 2954913 (1960-10-01), Rossman
patent: 3762626 (1973-10-01), Dorsey
patent: 4287265 (1981-09-01), McKnight
patent: 4292817 (1981-10-01), Loucks
patent: 4470264 (1984-09-01), Morris
patent: 4573581 (1986-03-01), Galloway et al.
patent: 4576017 (1986-03-01), Combs et al.
patent: 4721237 (1988-01-01), Leslie
patent: 4730748 (1988-03-01), Bane
patent: 4742916 (1988-05-01), Galea
patent: 4838427 (1989-06-01), Hurley
patent: 4889252 (1989-12-01), Rockom et al.
patent: 4923065 (1990-05-01), Ridgeway
patent: 4955480 (1990-09-01), Sexton
patent: 5071009 (1991-12-01), Ridgeway
patent: 5103651 (1992-04-01), Coelho et al.
patent: 5154309 (1992-10-01), Wischusen, III et al.
patent: 5175041 (1992-12-01), Webb et al.
patent: 5236088 (1993-08-01), Dhority et al.
patent: 5313809 (1994-05-01), Isaacson et al.
patent: 5417082 (1995-05-01), Foster et al.
patent: 5419152 (1995-05-01), Silber
patent: 5435142 (1995-07-01), Silber
patent: 5899088 (1999-05-01), Purdum
Bennett Henry
Jones Melvin
Throwleigh Technologies, LLC
LandOfFree
Container for transportation of temperature sensitive products does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Container for transportation of temperature sensitive products, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Container for transportation of temperature sensitive products will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-85925