Constant velocity joint

Details Constant velocity joint Constant velocity joint

2003-01-30

2004-02-10

Binda, Greg (Department: 3679)

Rotary shafts, gudgeons, housings, and flexible couplings for ro

Coupling accommodates drive between members having...

Coupling transmits torque via radially spaced ball

C464S906000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06688987

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
The technical field of this invention is constant velocity joints.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A well known constant velocity joint, used in the drive axles of front wheel drive motor vehicles, is the “Rzeppa” joint, described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,046,584, in which a driving member and a driven member transmit torque through a plurality (generally 6) of balls captured in longitudinal grooves in the driving and driven member and a cage. The geometry of the arrangement ensures that the balls are always aligned in a plane which bisects the angle between a pair of planes normal to the driving and driven axes of rotation; and constant velocity rotation of the driven member is thus assured, regardless of the joint angle between driving and driven members. As the joint angle increases, however, some portion of the driven member, usually the output shaft, eventually abuts some portion of the driving member to define a maximum joint angle. A variety of design factors and constraints work together to limit this maximum joint angle, and considerable effort has been expended in attempting to increase it. Such increases in maximum joint angle have generally come at the cost of an increase in joint package size, which is not desirable in the crowded engine compartments of front drive vehicles.
A modification of the original “Rzeppa” design is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,879,960 to Welschof et al. The constant velocity joint of this design is undercut-free: that is, the grooves of the outer joint member have a radial profile at the open end which is parallel to the joint axis so that they are not undercut in the longitudinal direction. The undercut-free design of this reference provides a reasonably high maximum joint angle; but an even higher joint angle is desired.
Commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,899 shows various constant velocity joint groove profiles which increase joint angle through a corresponding increase in the ratio (R
x
) of the ball center radius (BCR) to the inward axial displacement (x) of the ball center relative to BCR, such that R
x
=BCR/x=45 and greater at a joint angle of 46°. It is not always desirable to increase R
x
to the required range of 45 and above in order to achieve the higher joint angles.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The constant velocity joint of this invention provides an increase in maximum joint angle, relative to similarly constructed joints of the prior art, without a corresponding increase in joint package size. Thus, for any desired maximum joint angle, the constant velocity joint of this invention allows a smaller joint package size than a conventional “Rzeppa” joint of the prior art.
The constant velocity joint of this invention has a modified radial groove profile which significantly decreases ball movement radially inward of the ball center radius so that the ball cage may be increased in diameter without a corresponding increase in ball center radius. The radial groove profile provides a required predetermined funnel angle for ball control at the ball centered point of contact but minimal change in distance from the joint center over most of the axially inner side of the grooves in the outer joint member. One embodiment provides an undercut-free dual arc configuration of the ball grooves in which inner and middle arc segments are formed on the ball grooves of the outer joint member having centers of curvature which are axially offset to one side of the joint center and radially offset from one another and which transition into an undercut-free straight section at the open end of the joint. Another embodiment provides an undercut-free groove configuration in which a straight section of the outer joint ball grooves extends from the open end and transitions into a polynomial arc commencing at a transition point axially outward of the ball center plane at zero joint angle and extending inwardly toward an opposite closed end, and wherein the slope of curvature tangent to transition point is between 6 and 10°.
Both embodiments provide high angulation to the constant velocity joint without requiring an increase in package size of the outer joint member. In each case, the ratio R
x
=BCR/x=30 to <45, at 46° joint angle, thus achieving high joint angle with a relatively low R
x
ratio as compared to the joints described in aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 6,186,899.


REFERENCES:
patent: 2046584 (1936-07-01), Rzeppa
patent: 3879960 (1975-04-01), Welschof et al.
patent: 4698047 (1987-10-01), Welschof et al.
patent: 5509856 (1996-04-01), Welschof
patent: 5782696 (1998-07-01), Guimbretiere
patent: 6186899 (2001-02-01), Thomas et al.
patent: 6431988 (2002-08-01), Tone
patent: 0802341 (1997-10-01), None
SAE Universal Joint and Driveshaft Design Manual, AE-7, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, pp. 149 & 399, TJ1079.S62 1979.*
GKN Constant Velocity Product Catalog, GKN Automotive, Inc., Auburn Hills, MI, pp. 3 & 7, 1993.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Constant velocity joint does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Constant velocity joint, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Constant velocity joint will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3304627