Congestion control in a network

Multiplex communications – Data flow congestion prevention or control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C370S230000, C370S235000, C370S292000, C370S363000, C370S389000, C370S395100

Reexamination Certificate

active

07733770

ABSTRACT:
A source node receives related frames of data to be transmitted from the source node to a destination node and places the frames in a queue. The queue is associated with a communication path over which the related frames are to be transmitted to the destination node. An interface that couples the source node to the communication path receives an indication directed to the source node of traffic congestion in the communication path. In response, the source node controls the rate at which the related frames of data are transferred from the queue to a transmit buffer accessible to the interface, in order to relieve the traffic congestion in the communication path.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5379297 (1995-01-01), Glover et al.
patent: 5910955 (1999-06-01), Nishimura et al.
patent: 6091709 (2000-07-01), Harrison et al.
patent: 6134218 (2000-10-01), Holden
patent: 6320859 (2001-11-01), Momirov
patent: 6424624 (2002-07-01), Galand et al.
patent: 6628609 (2003-09-01), Chapman et al.
patent: 6697378 (2004-02-01), Patel
patent: 6721273 (2004-04-01), Lyon
patent: 6741555 (2004-05-01), Li et al.
patent: 6771601 (2004-08-01), Aydemir et al.
patent: 6778546 (2004-08-01), Epps et al.
patent: 7046665 (2006-05-01), Walrand et al.
patent: 7292567 (2007-11-01), Terrell et al.
patent: 7349403 (2008-03-01), Lee et al.
patent: 7369491 (2008-05-01), Beshai et al.
patent: 2002/0141427 (2002-10-01), McAlpine
patent: 2003/0016685 (2003-01-01), Berggreen
patent: 2003/0048750 (2003-03-01), Kobayashi
patent: 2003/0137938 (2003-07-01), Belanger et al.
patent: 2003/0174700 (2003-09-01), Ofek et al.
patent: 2005/0041587 (2005-02-01), Lee
patent: 2005/0108444 (2005-05-01), Flauaus et al.
patent: 2005/0157645 (2005-07-01), Rabie et al.
patent: 2006/0083186 (2006-04-01), Handforth et al.
patent: 2007/0291716 (2007-12-01), Morales Barroso
Grow, “The Structure for Congestion Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 13 pages.
Hedge et al., “IEEE Congestion Management—Presentation for IEEE Congestion Management Study Group”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 16 pages.
Thatcher, “Congestion Mangaement (CM)—Managing the Layer Stack”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 44 pages.
Martin, “A Survey of Standards Efforts on Traffic & Congestion Mangaement in Ethernet Networks”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 14 pages.
“Congestion Management in a Bladed System”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 5 pages.
Lynskey, “Preemption Simulations”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach CA, 10 pages.
Wadekar et al., “Proposal for 802.3 Enhancements for Congestion Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, May 24-25, 2004, Long Beach, CA, 23 pages.
Finn, “VLANs, Classes of Service, and Flows”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 19 pages.
Wadekar et al., “Proposal for CM Enhancements in 802.3”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 14 pages.
Ayandeh et al.,“IEEE 802.3 Flow Control Baseline Requirements”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 11 pages.
Gupta et al., “TCP/IP Modeling for Congestion Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 16 pages.
“Congestion Management 101 . . . or maybe 55½”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 29 pages.
“CMSG Problem Statement: Where We Started and Where We Are”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 8 pages.
“IEEE 802.3 Congestion Management Study Group July Plenary Report”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Jul. 13-15, 2004, Portland, OR, 14 pages.
Daines, “1:1 Oversubscription”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 12 pages.
Booth, “Ethernet Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, 2004, Ottawa, CA, 14 pages.
Wadekar et al.,“Rate Control in Short Range 802.3 Interconnects”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 21 pages.
Thaler, “Congestion Spreading—The Dark Side of Link-Based Congestion Control”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 10 pages.
Barrass et al., “Problem Space for Ethernet Congestion Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 32 pages.
“Joint Objectives list—few thoughts”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 5 pages.
“Problem Space for Ethernet Congestion Management”, Congestion Management Study Group Meeting, Sep. 27-28, 2004, Ottawa CA, 35 pages.
“IEEE 802.1F- 1993”, IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Common Definitions and Procedures for IEEE 802 Management Information, 1993, 39 pages.
“IEEE 802.1G”, 1998 Edition, Part 5: Remote Media Access Control (MAC) Bridging, 221 pages.
“IEEE 802.1H”, 1997 Edition, Part 5: Media Access Control (MAC) Bridging of Ethernet V2.0 in Local Area Networks, 18 pages.
“IEEE 802.1Q”, 203 Edition, Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks, 312 pages.
“IEEE 802.1X-2001, Port-Based Network Access Control”, 2001, 134 pages.
“IEEE 802.3ae-2002, Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications”, Amendment: Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layers, and Management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation, 516 pages.
ASI SIG, “Advanced Switching Core Architecture Specification”, Revision 1.0, Dec. 2003, 366 pages.
Aydemir et al.,“Flow Control in Gbs Ethemet Networks”, IBM, Nov. 11, 1998, 31 pages.
International Search Report for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/035410, mailed on Apr. 12, 2007, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/035410, mailed on Feb. 14, 2006, 11 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/957,895, mailed on Mar. 26, 2008, 12 pages.
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/957,895, mailed on Oct. 15, 2007, 18 pages.
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,897, mailed on Jan. 22, 2009, 26 pages.
Kant, “Introduction to Clusters” http://www.linuxclusters.com/books/clusters/chapter1/ (retrieved from the web on Apr. 26, 2005) 12 pages.
Kant, “Cluster Interconnects” http://www.linuxclusters.com/books/clusters/chapter3/ (retrieved from the web on Nov. 2, 2004) 9 pages.
HP BladeSystem p-Class networking, (retrieved from the web on Oct. 27, 2005) 2 pages http://h18004.wwwl.hp.com/products/bladescomponents/bl-p-interconnect-switch.html.
HP ProLiant BL p-Class Networking Overview, 5982-2202EN, May 2004.
Computerworld, “IBM to resell InfiniBand switch”, (Retrieved from the web on Oct. 27, 2004)2 pg.http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,89037,00.html.
Gravel, Penton Media, Inc., “Novel Interconnect Scheme Enhances Comm Design” http://www.elecdesign.com?Articles/Print.cfm?ArticlelD=8649 (retrieved from the web on Oct. 27, 2004) 8 pages.
Strod, EETIMES, “RapidIO moves up to Fabric” (retrieved from the web on Oct. 27, 2004) http://www.eet.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=26100703 3 pages.
Cummings, EETIMES, “AdvancedTCA helps NPU-based redesigns” 3 pages http://www.eetimes.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleld=18311105 (retrieved from the web on Oct. 27, 2004).
Gravel, Fulcrum Microsystems, “Asynchronous lo

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Congestion control in a network does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Congestion control in a network, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Congestion control in a network will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4238545

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.