Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer-to-computer session/connection establishing
Reexamination Certificate
2007-10-28
2010-10-26
Jean, Frantz B (Department: 2454)
Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput
Computer-to-computer session/connection establishing
Reexamination Certificate
active
07822859
ABSTRACT:
An improved networked computer communications system handles arbitrary streams of data, and transports at varying speeds those streams where intermediate updates can be dropped if they are obsoleted by later arriving data updates, optimizing the utilization of network and node resources. Complex buffering by system server software allows distributed, parallel, or redundant processing, transmission, and storage for performance, reliability, and robustness. Various parameters of the system can be monitored, and the system can be reconfigured automatically based on the observations. Varied techniques reduce the perceived end-to-end latency and take advantage of software and hardware capabilities that assets connected to the system may possess. One conferencing system allows conference participants to share all or a portion of the display seen on their computer screens. The conferees may be at sites removed from each other, or may view a recorded presentation or archived conference at different times. Conference participants are either “presenters” who can modify the display or “attendees” who cannot modify the display. A pointer icon, which can be labeled to identify the conferee, is displayed on the shared image area. Each conferee can modify the position of his or her own pointer, even when not presenting, so that every participant can see what each conferee is pointing to, should a conferee choose to point to an element of the display. These and other features apply to other data streams shared in the conference or in meetings where there is no shared-image data stream.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4110560 (1978-08-01), Leary et al.
patent: 4414621 (1983-11-01), Bown et al.
patent: 5241625 (1993-08-01), Epard et al.
patent: 5455599 (1995-10-01), Cabral et al.
patent: 5485212 (1996-01-01), Frederick
patent: 5506832 (1996-04-01), Arshi et al.
patent: 5530795 (1996-06-01), Wan
patent: 5548324 (1996-08-01), Downs et al.
patent: 5550982 (1996-08-01), Long et al.
patent: 5553083 (1996-09-01), Miller
patent: 5563649 (1996-10-01), Gould et al.
patent: 5600646 (1997-02-01), Polomski
patent: 5617539 (1997-04-01), Ludwig et al.
patent: 5649104 (1997-07-01), Carleton et al.
patent: 5689553 (1997-11-01), Ahuja et al.
patent: 5689641 (1997-11-01), Ludwig et al.
patent: 5706290 (1998-01-01), Shaw et al.
patent: 5727002 (1998-03-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5737448 (1998-04-01), Gardos
patent: 5740371 (1998-04-01), Wallis
patent: 5764235 (1998-06-01), Hunt et al.
patent: 5764731 (1998-06-01), Yablon
patent: 5774668 (1998-06-01), Choquier et al.
patent: 5790818 (1998-08-01), Martin
patent: 5793365 (1998-08-01), Tang et al.
patent: 5793980 (1998-08-01), Glaser et al.
patent: 5802322 (1998-09-01), Niblett
patent: 5822523 (1998-10-01), Rothschild et al.
patent: 5826025 (1998-10-01), Gramlich
patent: 5845265 (1998-12-01), Woolston
patent: 5859979 (1999-01-01), Tung et al.
patent: 5877762 (1999-03-01), Young
patent: 5909543 (1999-06-01), Tanaka et al.
patent: 5926208 (1999-07-01), Noonen et al.
patent: 5956027 (1999-09-01), Krishnamurthy
patent: 5983263 (1999-11-01), Rothrock et al.
patent: 6081829 (2000-06-01), Sidana
patent: 6167432 (2000-12-01), Jiang
patent: 6246758 (2001-06-01), Low et al.
patent: 6249291 (2001-06-01), Popp et al.
patent: 6313863 (2001-11-01), Chida
patent: 6314501 (2001-11-01), Gulick et al.
patent: 6343313 (2002-01-01), Salesky et al.
patent: 6345297 (2002-02-01), Grimm et al.
patent: 6560707 (2003-05-01), Curtis et al.
patent: 6594699 (2003-07-01), Sahai et al.
patent: 6772335 (2004-08-01), Curtis et al.
patent: 7013327 (2006-03-01), Hickman et al.
patent: 2003/0140159 (2003-07-01), Campbell et al.
US 5,715,404, 02/1998, Katseff et al. (withdrawn)
Stahl, S., “Conferencing Breakthrough,” Distributed by CMF Publications, Jun. 26, 1995, http://www.informationweek.com/533/33iucon.htm, last visited Apr. 13, 2005.
“Face Off,” Distributed by BYTE, http://www.byte.com/art/9510/sec7/art3.htm., Oct. 1995.
“Transmission Control Protocol,” Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, 1981, 83 pages.
Eleftheriadis, A. et al., “Meeting Arbitrary QoS Constraints Using Dynamic Rate Shaping of Coded Digital Video,” Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video, 1995, pp. 1-12.
Frederick, R., “Experiences with Real-Time Software Video Compression,” Xerox PARC, 1994, pp. 1-4.
Gajewska, H. et al., “Argo: A System for Distributed Collaboration,” Systems Research Center, Digital Equipment Corporation, 8 pages.
Jeffay, K. et al., “Adaptive, Best-Effort Delivery of Digital Audio and Video Across Packet-Switched Networks,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science, 1993, 12 pages.
Jeffay, K. et al., “Transport and Display Mechanisms for Multimedia Conferencing Across Packet-Switched Networks,” University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science, 1993, 28 pages.
MacEdonia, M. et al., “Mbone Provides Audio and Video Across the Internet,” IEEE Computer, 1994, 12 pages.
McCanne, S. et al., “Receiver-Driven Layered Multicast,” University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1996, 14 pages.
Schulzrinne, H. et al., “RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments, 1989, 66 pages.
Stallings, W., “Data and Computer Communications,” Fourth Edition, Copyright 1985, 1988, 1991, and 1994, 12 pages.
Turletti, T. et al., “Issues with Multicast Video Distribution in Heterogeneous Packet Networks,” Sophia-Antipolis Codex, France, 4 pages.
Wakeman, I., “Packetized Video-Options for Interaction Between the User, the Network and the Codec,” The Computer Journal, vol. 36, No. 1, 1993, pp. 55-67.
Wolf, K. et al., “Multimedia Application Sharing in a Heterogeneous Environment,” ACM Multimedia 95—Electronic Proceedings, 1995, 14 pages.
Wood, K. et al., “Global Teleporting with Java: Towards Ubiquitous Personalized Computing,” The Olivetti & Oracle Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, pp. 1-13.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Claim Construction Order re: U.S. Patent No. 6,343,313; Jul. 28, 2004.
Wikipedia, “Multipoint Control Unit,” Dec. 20, 2005 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipoint—Control—Unit).
Networkworld, “MCU,” Oct. 22, 2001 (http://www.networkworld.com/details/762.html?def).
Techweb, “MCU,” 2003 (http://www.techweb.com/encyclopedia/shared/printArticlePageSrc.jhtml?term=MCU).
Pixion, Inc. v.Citrix Systems, Inc. et al. (N.D. Cal. C-09-03496 (SI)), “Defendant Citrix Systems, Inc.'s and Citrix Online, LLC's Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims for Declaratory Relief” (Nov. 6, 2009).
“Defendants and Counterclaimants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4,” Case No. 3:09-cv-03496-SI,Pixion, Inc. v.Citrix Systems, Inc., United States District Court Northern District of California, Jan. 19, 2010, pp. 1-4.
“Exhibit A, List of Invalidating Prior Art,” Case No. 3:09-cv-03496-SI, “Defendants and Counterclaimants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4,”Pixion, Inc. v.Citrix Systems, Inc., United States District Court Northern District of California, Jan. 19, 2010, pp. 1-22.
“Exhibit B, U.S. Patent No. 7,369,515: Invalidity Contention Based on ORCA Video Conferencing System—Aug. 1995,” Case No. 3:09-cv-03496-SI, “Defendants and Counterclaimants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4,”Pixion, Inc. v.Citrix Systems, Inc., United States District Court Northern District of California, Jan. 19, 2010, pp. 1-14.
“Exhibi
Flower John
Janne Edward Arthur Ho-Ming
Kaul Clint
Madams Peter
Salesky Joseph
Carr & Ferrell LLP
Jean Frantz B
Pixion, Inc.
LandOfFree
Conference server redundancy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Conference server redundancy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Conference server redundancy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4178624